Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §15-18-66, enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 748, § 2; Ga. L. 2012, p. 53, § 2/SB 352; Ga. L. 2012, p. 775, § 15/HB 942.)
- Chapter 89, Title 28 of the United States Code, referred to in this Code section, governs district courts and the removal of cases from state courts, and is codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1441 et seq.
- Second sentence of O.C.G.A. § 15-18-66(b)(10) modifies the first sentence of the subsection to mean that solicitors are authorized to enter nolle prosequis on those accusations that have been filed with the trial courts at their direction; thus, the trial court erred in relying upon the subsection to rule that uniform traffic citations were not officially filed for purposes of the accused's right to file a speedy trial demand. Hayek v. State, 269 Ga. 728, 506 S.E.2d 372 (1998).
- Petitioner had at least one basis for claiming that an application for writ of habeas corpus was properly served as the petitioner served the petition on the solicitor general of the county where the misdemeanor conviction was entered and the solicitor general of the state court was the proper representative of the state in an action attacking such a conviction by means of an application for writ of habeas corpus; thus, the trial court did not err in declining to dismiss the petition for insufficiency of service. State v. Jaramillo, 279 Ga. 691, 620 S.E.2d 798 (2005).
Cited in State v. Rish, 222 Ga. App. 729, 476 S.E.2d 50 (1996); Shire v. State, 225 Ga. App. 306, 483 S.E.2d 694 (1997); Meservey v. State, 230 Ga. App. 382, 496 S.E.2d 518 (1998); State v. Johnson, 257 Ga. App. 162, 570 S.E.2d 627 (2002).
Total Results: 3
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2005-10-03
Citation: 620 S.E.2d 798, 279 Ga. 691, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 640
Snippet: means of a petition for habeas corpus. OCGA § 15-18-66(b)(7) (the solicitor-general of a state court
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2002-11-12
Citation: 572 S.E.2d 553, 275 Ga. 696
Snippet: represent himself in the Worton litigation. See OCGA § 15-18-66; Stephenson v. Bd. of Commissioners of Cobb County
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1998-09-14
Citation: 506 S.E.2d 372, 269 Ga. 728
Snippet: trial court's ruling was authorized by OCGA § 15-18-66(b)(10)'s provision that solicitors are authorized