O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-18-66 (2019)

Duties; authority

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The duties of the solicitors-general within their respective counties are: (1) To attend each session of the state court when criminal cases are to be heard unless excused by the judge thereof and to remain until the business of the state is disposed of;

(2) To administer the oaths required by law to the bailiffs or other officers of the court and otherwise to aid the presiding judge in organizing the court as may be necessary; (3) To file accusations on such criminal cases deemed prosecutable and, subject to paragraph (10) of subsection (b) of this Code section, to prosecute all accused offenses; (4) To attend before the appellate courts when any criminal case in which the solicitor-general represents the state is heard, to argue the same, and to perform any other duty therein which the interest of the state may require; and (5) To perform such other duties as are or may be required by law or which necessarily appertain to their office.

(b) The authority of the solicitors-general shall include but is not limited to the following: (1) To review and, if necessary, investigate all criminal cases which may be prosecuted in state court;

(2) When authorized by law, to represent the interests of the state in all courts of inquiry within the county in any matter wherein misdemeanor offenses are heard;

(3) When authorized by the local governing authority, to be the prosecuting attorney of any municipal court, recorder’s court, or probate court; (4) To prosecute civil actions to enforce any civil penalty set forth in Code Section 40-6-163 and when authorized by law to prosecute or defend any civil action in the state court in the prosecution or defense of which the state is interested, unless otherwise specially provided for; (5) To reduce to judgment any fine, forfeiture, or restitution imposed by the state court as part of a sentence in a criminal case or forfeiture of a recognizance which is not paid in accordance with the order of the court. The solicitor-general may institute such civil or criminal action in the courts of this state or of the United States or any of the several states, to enforce said judgment against the property of the defendant; (6) To prosecute on behalf of the state any criminal action which is removed from the state court to a United States district court pursuant to Chapter 89 of Title 28 of the United States Code. The expenses incurred by the solicitor-general as actual costs in the prosecution of any such case shall be paid by the county; (7) To represent the state or any officer or agent of the county in a superior court in any habeas corpus action arising out of any criminal proceeding in the state court, except in those cases in which the commissioner of public safety is named as a party;

(8) At the request of any district attorney or solicitor-general, to prosecute or assist in the prosecution of any criminal or civil action and when acting in such capacity a solicitor-general shall have the same authority and power as the requesting prosecutor; (9) To request and utilize the assistance of any solicitor-general, assistant solicitor-general, district attorney, assistant district attorney, or other attorney employed by an agency of this state or its political subdivisions or authorities in the prosecution of any criminal or civil action; (10) To enter a nolle prosequi on any accusation, citation, or summons filed and pending or on any indictment pending in the state court as provided by law. No accusation, citation, or summons shall be considered filed unless such filing has been done with the consent, direction, or approval of the solicitor-general. Further, no notice of arraignment shall be given prior to such filing without the solicitor-general’s consent, direction, or approval. Prior to the filing of an accusation, citation, or summons, the solicitor-general shall have the same authority and discretion as district attorneys over criminal cases within their jurisdiction; (11) To request the magistrate to schedule within a reasonable time a preliminary probable cause hearing in any pending misdemeanor case prior to the filing of an accusation and to represent the interests of the state at such hearing; and (12) To exercise such authority as may be permitted by law or which necessarily appertains to their office.

(c) The provisions of this Code section shall not be deemed to restrict, limit, or diminish any authority or power granted to a solicitor-general by local Act.

History

(Code 1981, § 15-18-66, enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 748, § 2; Ga. L. 2012, p. 53, § 2/SB 352; Ga. L. 2012, p. 775, § 15/HB 942.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Nolle prosequi. - Second sentence of O.C.G.A. § 15-18-66(b)(10) modifies the first sentence of the subsection to mean that solicitors are authorized to enter nolle prosequis on those accusations that have been filed with the trial courts at their direction; thus, the trial court erred

in relying upon the subsection to rule that uniform traffic citations were not officially filed for purposes of the accused’s right to file a speedy trial demand. Hayek v. State, 269 Ga. 728, 506 S.E.2d 372 (1998). Solicitor general is representative of the state. - Petitioner had at least

one basis for claiming that an application for writ of habeas corpus was properly served as the petitioner served the petition on the solicitor general of the county where the misdemeanor conviction was entered and the solicitor general of the state court was the proper representative of the state in an action attacking such a conviction by means of an application for writ of habeas corpus; thus, the trial court

did not err in declining to dismiss the petition for insufficiency of service. State v. Jaramillo, 279 Ga. 691, 620 S.E.2d 798 (2005). Cited in State v. Rish, 222 Ga. App. 729, 476 S.E.2d 50 (1996); Shire v. State, 225 Ga. App. 306, 483 S.E.2d 694 (1997); Meservey v. State, 230 Ga. App. 382, 496 S.E.2d 518 (1998); State v. Johnson, 257 Ga. App. 162, 570 S.E.2d 627 (2002).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2025 · leading case: Hayek v. State, 506 S.E.2d 372 (Ga. 1998).
Hayek v. State, 506 S.E.2d 372 (Ga. 1998). · cites it 8× “The State contends that the trial court’s ruling was authorized by OCGA § 15-18-66 (b) (10)’s provision that solicitors are authorized to “enter a nolle prosequi on any accusation, citation, or summons filed and pending .”
State v. Rish, 476 S.E.2d 50 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 6× “While not binding in this case, we note that the Georgia General Assembly recently enacted OCGA § 15-18-66, which provides in part: “No accusation, citation, or summons shall be considered filed unless such filing has been done with the consent, direction, or approval of the…”
Shire v. State, 483 S.E.2d 694 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 4× ““While not binding in this case, we note that the Georgia General Assembly recently enacted OCGA § 15-18-66, which provides in part: ‘No accusation, citation, or summons shall be considered filed unless such filing has been done with the consent, direction, or approval of the…”
Poole v. State, 494 S.E.2d 251 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “Such conduct not only constitutes a dereliction of the solicitor’s duties under OCGA § 15-18-66 (a) (4), but may also subject him or her to contempt of this Court under Court of Appeals Rule 26 (b).”
State v. Jaramillo, 620 S.E.2d 798 (Ga. 2005). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 15-18-66 (b) (7) (the solicitor-general of a state court is authorized “[t]o represent the state or any officer or agent of the county in a superior court in any habeas corpus action arising out of any criminal proceeding in the state court, except in those cases in which…”
Gwinnett Cnty. v. Blaney, 572 S.E.2d 553 (Ga. 2002). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 15-18-66; Stephenson v. Bd. of Commissioners of Cobb County, supra at 400 (3).”
Meservey v. State, 496 S.E.2d 518 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “3 OCGA § 15-18-66 (b) (10) provides: “No accusation, citation, or summons shall be considered filed unless such filing has been done with the consent, direction, or approval of the solicitor-general.”
Blackwell v. State, 502 S.E.2d 774 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 15-18-66 (b) (10). Decided June 16, 1998.”
Lewis v. Ritz Carlton Hotel Co., LLC, 712 S.E.2d 91 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 15-18-66 (b) (10) (solicitors-general have authority “[t]o enter a nolle prosequi on any accusation, citation, or summons filed and pending”).”
Millan v. State, 497 S.E.2d 664 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “1 Although OCGA § 15-18-66 (b) (10) was not in effect when the UTCs were filed in this case, it expresses the current legislative intention that: “No accusation, citation, or summons shall be considered filed unless such filing has been done with the consent, direction, or…”
State v. Johnson, 570 S.E.2d 627 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 15-18-66 (b) (10). See Buice v. State, 272 Ga.”
Hank Carver Spackman v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 4× “We explained in Shire v. State, supra, that [t]here are many benefits to the solicitor, as the state prosecutor, determining whether a prosecution should proceed and when within the law it should do so.”
— 15-18-66(a)(4) — 1 case
Poole v. State, 494 S.E.2d 251 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). “Such conduct not only constitutes a dereliction of the solicitor’s duties under OCGA § 15-18-66 (a) (4), but may also subject him or her to contempt of this Court under Court of Appeals Rule 26 (b).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.