CopyCited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 7, 2019
...master that Jefferson had violated Rule 8.1.5 The Review Board
recommends that Jefferson be disbarred from the practice of law.
Notwithstanding the motion for sanctions resulting in her
default, Jefferson now contends that, in light of OCGA §
15-19-32,6
SE2d 499) (1998) (a response in disciplinary proceedings invoking the Fifth
Amendment may result in an adverse inference being drawn by the factfinder).
Thus, the Review Board agreed with the special master that either the
imposition...
...The Review Board agreed with the special
master that Jefferson’s conduct during the course of the proceedings was
dishonest, disrespectful, and disruptive, and found that such conduct could be
considered an aggravating factor in determining the appropriate level of
discipline.
6 OCGA §
15-19-32 (previously Ga....
...8
she may elect to have a superior court jury determine any material
issues of fact before a judgment of disbarment is issued. She has
filed a motion in this Court purporting to invoke such election.
Notwithstanding OCGA §
15-19-32, “[t]he judicial branch of
government has the inherent power to regulate the conduct of
attorneys and supervise the practice of law[.]” Henderson v....