O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-2-1 (2019)

One supreme judicial district

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The entire state shall constitute one supreme judicial district.

History

Orig. Code 1863, § 46; Code 1868, § 44; Code 1873, § 42; Code 1882,

§ 42; Civil Code 1895, § 5493; Civil Code 1910, § 6098; Code 1933, § 24-3701.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2017–2026 · leading case: Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 226 F. Supp. 3d 1359 (N.D. Ga. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 226 F. Supp. 3d 1359 (N.D. Ga. 2017). · cites it 2× “The main substantive issue in both summary judgment motions is whether the Underlying Cases constitute a single or multiple “occurrences” as defined in the Travelers Policies.”
Simms v. State (Ga. 2026). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 15-2-1(4). 6 decided by the jury voidable).”
Simms v. State (Ga. 2026). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 15-2-1(4). 6 decided by the jury voidable).”
— 15-2-1(4) — 2 cases
Simms v. State (Ga. 2026). “” OCGA § 15-2-1(4). 6 decided by the jury voidable).”
Simms v. State (Ga. 2026). “” OCGA § 15-2-1(4). 6 decided by the jury voidable).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.