Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 15-6-82 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 15-6-82 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 15-6-82

TITLE 15 COURTS

Section 6. Superior Courts, 15-6-1 through 15-6-100.

ARTICLE 2 CLERKS OF SUPERIOR COURTS

15-6-82. Governor ordering investigation of clerk of court; suspension of clerk.

  1. Whenever the Governor determines that an investigation of a clerk of superior court of this state should be made as a result of criminal charges, alleged misconduct in office, or alleged incapacity of the clerk of superior court to perform the functions of his or her office, the Governor shall appoint an investigative committee consisting of two clerks of superior court who are members of The Council of Superior Court Clerks of Georgia and the Attorney General to conduct an investigation. Such clerks of superior court may be from any two counties in the state other than the county of the clerk of superior court under investigation. The members of any such committee shall receive no compensation for their services but shall be reimbursed for any expenses incurred in connection with an investigation. The funds necessary to conduct an investigation shall come from the funds appropriated to the executive branch of the state government.
  2. Any member of the committee shall be authorized to administer oaths to any witness before the committee. The committee shall make a report of its investigation to the Governor within 30 days from the date of the appointment of both clerk members by the Governor.
  3. If the committee recommends the suspension of the clerk of superior court, the Governor shall be authorized to suspend the clerk of superior court for a period of up to 60 days. In any case where a clerk of superior court has been suspended for 60 days, the Governor may extend the period of suspension for an additional 30 days. Upon such recommendation, the Governor shall also be authorized to request the district attorney of the county of the clerk's residence to bring a removal petition against the clerk in superior court based upon the evidence reported by the committee. After the filing of such petition, a clerk of superior court is subject to being removed from office by the judge of the court for any sufficient cause, including incapacity or misbehavior in office. The charges must be exhibited to the court in writing, and the facts tried by a jury. The clerk shall be entitled to a copy of the charges three days before trial. In the event that the Governor determines that further investigation should be made, the Governor may then order additional investigation by the committee, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, other law enforcement agencies of this state, or any special committee appointed by the Governor for such purpose. During any period of suspension, the clerk shall continue to hold office; however, the chief deputy clerk shall perform the duties of the clerk of superior court or, in the absence of a chief deputy clerk, an interim clerk shall be appointed as provided in paragraph (1) of subsection (b) of Code Section 15-6-53 to perform the duties of the clerk during the period of suspension.
  4. If the clerk of superior court is indicted for a felony, the provisions of Code Section 45-5-6 shall apply.

(Orig. Code 1863, § 267; Code 1868, § 261; Code 1873, § 272; Code 1882, § 272; Civil Code 1895, § 4366; Civil Code 1910, § 4897; Code 1933, § 24-2724; Ga. L. 2012, p. 173, § 1-19/HB 665.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Proceedings under this section are quasi-criminal and acquittal was final. Cobb v. Smith, 102 Ga. 585, 27 S.E. 763 (1897).

Applicability to sheriff.

- Former Code 1933, §§ 24-2813, 24-2814, 77-110, and 77-111 (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 15-16-10 and42-4-4) and the provisions of former Code 1933, § 24-2724 (see now O.C.G.A. § 15-6-82) apply to the removal of sheriffs from office. Adamson v. Leathers, 60 Ga. App. 382, 3 S.E.2d 871 (1939).

What is sufficient cause for removal of clerk.

- Sufficient cause for removal from office means legal cause, and that which specially relates to and affects the administration of the office, and must be restricted to something of a substantial nature, directly affecting the rights and interests of the public. Adamson v. Leathers, 60 Ga. App. 382, 3 S.E.2d 871 (1939).

What is sufficient cause for removal of sheriff.

- Under former Code 1933, § 24-2724 (see now O.C.G.A. § 15-6-82), sheriffs were subject to be removed from office for "any sufficient cause," and sufficient cause means a cause relating to and affecting the administration of the office and material to the interests of the public. Adamson v. Leathers, 60 Ga. App. 382, 3 S.E.2d 871 (1939).

Mere rudeness will not suffice to remove clerk. Lancaster v. Hill, 136 Ga. 405, 71 S.E. 731, 1912C Ann. Cas. 272 (1911).

Allegations of conduct constituting crime of extortion are sufficient allegations of official misbehavior. Lancaster v. Hill, 136 Ga. 405, 71 S.E. 731, 1912C Ann. Cas. 272 (1911).

Applicability to misconduct in other office.

- Clerk cannot be removed from office for any misconduct of duties as ex officio clerk of city court. Wallace v. State, 34 Ga. App. 281, 129 S.E. 299 (1925).

Particularity of charges.

- If the petition alleges that the acts of misconduct which are grounds for removal are illustrated in detail by a certain auditor's report on file in the office of the clerk of the superior court (who is the defendant), and which is referred to in the petition as an exhibit, the charges are alleged with a degree of particularity sufficient to put the defendant on notice. Wallace v. State, 34 Ga. App. 281, 129 S.E. 299 (1925).

Jurisdiction of appeal.

- Court of appeals has jurisdiction of writ of error (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 5-6-49 and5-6-50) sued out by a clerk when a motion for a new trial was overruled by the trial judge. Wallace v. State, 155 Ga. 414, 117 S.E. 243 (1923).

Cited in Robitzsch v. State, 189 Ga. 637, 7 S.E.2d 387 (1940); Cole v. Holland, 219 Ga. 227, 132 S.E.2d 657 (1963); In re Irvin, 171 Ga. App. 794, 321 S.E.2d 119 (1984).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Misconduct sufficient as grounds for removal under former Code 1933, §§ 24-2724, 24-2813, and 24-2814 (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 15-6-82 and15-16-10) did not also constitute grounds for quo warranto, unless such misconduct resulted in conviction and consequent loss of civil rights. 1954-56 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 116.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 15A Am. Jur. 2d, Clerks of Court, §§ 9, 10.

C.J.S.

- 21 C.J.S., Courts, § 332.

No results found for Georgia Code 15-6-82.