O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-7-60 (2019)

Local laws

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter is not intended to repeal any local law creating a state court; and, to the extent any such local law does not conflict with the provisions of this chapter, such local law shall remain in full force and effect.

History

Code 1981, § 15-7-60, enacted by Ga. L. 1983, p. 1419, § 2.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Speedy trial provisions. - As O.C.G.A. § 15-7-43(b), enacted in 1983, incorporates the speedy trial provisions of O.C.G.A. § 17-7-170 by reference, those provisions supersede a 1981 local law provision entitling a defendant in a state court to discharge and acquittal if no trial is had at the term when the demand is made or within the next two succeeding

regular terms thereafter. Majia v. State, 174 Ga. App. 432, 330 S.E.2d 171, aff ’d, 254 Ga. 660, 333 S.E.2d 834 (1985); Parks v. State, 239 Ga. App. 333, 521 S.E.2d 370 (1999). Cited in Holland v. State, 151 Ga. App. 189, S.E.2d (1979); Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. Friedman, 156 Ga. App. 880, 275 S.E.2d 817 (1981).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1999–2007 · leading case: Parks v. State, 521 S.E.2d 370 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999).
Parks v. State, 521 S.E.2d 370 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 15-7-3; see also OCGA § 15-7-60. Further, “[t]he general laws and rules of practice, pleading, procedure, and evidence which are applicable to the superior courts of this state” also govern the state courts.”
Green v. State, 655 S.E.2d 615 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to OCGA§ 15-7-60, local laws creating state courts that are not in conflict with Chapter 7 of Title 15, which governs the state courts of counties, shall remain in full force and effect.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.