Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than ten nor more than 20 years.
shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years nor more than ten years or by a fine of not less than $10,000.00 nor more than $25,000.00, or both.
(Code 1981, §16-10-32, enacted by Ga. L. 1998, p. 270, § 4.)
- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1998, a comma was deleted following "kill another person" in the introductory paragraph of subsection (a).
- For review of 1998 legislation relating to crimes and offenses, see 15 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 80 (1998).
- Probate judge who, among other conduct, requested that two probation officers who had testified against the probate judge at the Judicial Qualifications Commission be removed from the judge's court violated O.C.G.A. § 16-10-32 and was removed from office and barred from seeking judicial office again. Inquiry Concerning Fowler, 287 Ga. 467, 696 S.E.2d 644 (2010).
- Georgia Court of Appeals concludes that actually exercising one's right to file a lawsuit, conspiring with others to file a lawsuit, in and of itself, does not constitute a threat as required to support the crimes under O.C.G.A. §§ 16-10-93(a),16-10-93(b)(1)(A),16-10-32(b)(1), or16-10-32(b)(4). Brown v. State, 322 Ga. App. 446, 745 S.E.2d 699 (2013).
- During an intake interview at a mental health evaluation facility, a defendant's threats regarding the defendant's sentencing judge were made for the purpose of diagnosis and treatment of mental health issues, not with the purpose of terrorizing the judge or intimidating the judge from attending legal proceedings as required for finding terroristic threats in violation of O.C.G.A. §§ 16-10-32(b) and16-11-37(a). Koldewey v. State, 310 Ga. App. 788, 714 S.E.2d 371 (2011), cert. denied, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 239 (Ga. 2012).
- There was sufficient evidence to support defendant's conviction of threatening a witness in an official proceeding with regard to defendant unlawfully causing economic harm to the witness's family member by damaging the witness's spouse's car by setting the car on fire, and defendant's argument that the evidence did not show that the spouse suffered any economic harm since money was still owed on the car, the car had been broken down for about a year, and the spouse received an insurance check, did not contradict the jury's finding of economic harm. Further, the spouse's testimony authorized the jury to find that, as a result of the fire, the spouse suffered an uninsured loss of valuable personal property that was in the car, which was sufficient to show that the fire to the car had caused economic harm. Shelnutt v. State, 289 Ga. App. 528, 657 S.E.2d 611 (2008), cert. denied, No. S08C0977, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 518 (Ga. 2008).
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-11-23
Citation: 298 Ga. 221, 780 S.E.2d 311
Snippet: failed to produce evidence of violations of OCGA § 16-10-32(b)(1) which concerns physical or economic threats
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-06-28
Citation: 696 S.E.2d 644, 287 Ga. 467, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2072, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 480
Snippet: against him in the future," in violation of OCGA § 16-10-32(b)(1) (felony to threaten economic harm with the