Editor's notes.

- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Code 1933, § 26-6502, as it read prior to revision of the title by Ga. L. 1968, p. 1249, are included in the annotations for this Code section.

Possession of gambling devices and equipment and operating a gambling place are separate offenses.

- Although arising from the same transaction, offenses of possession of gambling devices and equipment, and commercial gambling by operating a gambling place, are separate and distinct. Baxter v. State, 134 Ga. App. 286, 214 S.E.2d 578, cert. denied, 423 U.S. 895, 96 S. Ct. 194, 46 L. Ed. 2d 127 (1975).

Slot machine as gambling device.

- An apparatus, known as a "slot machine," by which a person depositing money therein may, by chance, get directly or indirectly money or articles of value worth either more or less than the money deposited, falls within the purview of former Code 1933, § 26-6502, and cannot be treated as one kept only for amusement. Elder v. Camp, 193 Ga. 320, 18 S.E.2d 622 (1942) (decided under former Code 1933, § 26-6502).

Showing possession of gambling device without also showing actual operation.

- Mere keeping of device for hazarding of money being prohibited by law, and a device so kept being contraband, it is unnecessary in showing illegality of the device, to allege and prove a further violation of law by its actual operation. Elder v. Camp, 193 Ga. 320, 18 S.E.2d 622 (1942) (decided under former Code 1933, § 26-6502).

Mere keeping of a device for hazarding of money being prohibited by law, and a device so kept being contraband, it is unnecessary, in showing illegality of the device, to allege and prove a further violation of law by its actual operation. Miller v. State, 94 Ga. App. 259, 94 S.E.2d 120 (1956) (decided under former Code 1933, § 26-6502).

Search warrant was based on probable cause because Clayton County investigators purchased an illegal video poker machine from a subject in Clayton County, who said that the machine was obtained from a particular address in DeKalb County, and both DeKalb and Clayton investigators observed "several other illegal video poker machines" at that address; while the investigators could not tell from looking at the machines whether the machines were legal or not, the test was only whether the evidence established a fair probability that contraband would be found. Jones v. State, 276 Ga. App. 810, 625 S.E.2d 4 (2005).

Owner of seized gambling articles cannot bring action in trover.

- When a sheriff finds articles kept for the purpose of gambling, an action of trover by the owner against the sheriff for their recovery will not lie, since courts are created for the upholding of law and of morals, and will decline to allow their processes to be used to further maintenance of crimes and public evils, by assisting or protecting such an owner in recovering the implements of crime or illegal paraphernalia. Elder v. Camp, 193 Ga. 320, 18 S.E.2d 622 (1942) (decided under former Code 1933, § 26-6502).

Cited in Osbourne v. State, 128 Ga. App. 81, 195 S.E.2d 662 (1973); United States v. Hawes, 529 F.2d 472 (5th Cir. 1976); Total Vending Serv., Inc. v. Gwinnett County, 153 Ga. App. 109, 264 S.E.2d 574 (1980).

Editor's notes.

- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, opinions under former Code 1933, § 26-6502 are included in the annotations for this Code section.

Gambling in vessel beyond state's three-mile limit.

- The 1992 amendments to the Johnson Act (15 U.S.C. § 1175) have preempted O.C.G.A. § 16-12-24's prohibition on the possession of gambling devices as applied to foreign or U.S. registered vessels where all gambling activities take place beyond the state's three-mile territorial limits, where the gambling devices remain on board when the vessel is in a Georgia port. 1992 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U92-20.

Electronic slot machines are gambling devices per se; they are contraband; they can be seized and destroyed as contraband; possession of such devices is a crime; no demonstration of operation of any such device is necessary antecedent to its seizure, nor is any demonstration necessary to establish basis of criminal prosecution for possession of said device. 1971 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 71-167.

Electronic games that are entirely games of chance are gambling devices per se. Electronic games which are not games of skill, and which are worthless except as games of chance, are gambling devices per se, and ownership, manufacture, transfer commercially, or possession of such devices within this state is prohibited. 1970 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U70-202.

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 38 Am. Jur. 2d, Gambling, § 64 et seq.

C.J.S.

- 38 C.J.S., Gaming, §§ 155, 156.

ALR.

- Coin-operated or slot machines as lottery, 101 A.L.R. 1126.

Possession of gambling device as offense not requiring showing that device was used for gambling or kept for gambling purposes, 162 A.L.R. 1188.

Punchboard as a lottery, 163 A.L.R. 1279.

Paraphernalia or appliances used for recording gambling transactions or receiving or furnishing gambling information as gaming "devices" within criminal statute or ordinance, 1 A.L.R.3d 726.

Validity of criminal legislation making possession of gambling or lottery devices or paraphernalia presumptive or prima facie evidence of other incriminating facts, 17 A.L.R.3d 491.

Construction and application of state or municipal enactments relating to policy or numbers games, 70 A.L.R.3d 897.