
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448phetamine, or any mixture containing 3,4-methylenedioxyam
phetamine or 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine
as described in Schedule I, in violation of this article commits the felony offense of trafficking in 3,4-methylenedioxyam-
phetamine or 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as follows:
(Code 1981, §16-13-31.1, enacted by Ga. L. 2004, p. 1070, § 1; Ga. L. 2007, p. 47, § 16/SB 103; Ga. L. 2013, p. 222, § 5/HB 349; Ga. L. 2014, p. 432, § 2-9/HB 826; Ga. L. 2014, p. 780, § 2-3/SB 364; Ga. L. 2015, p. 5, § 16/HB 90; Ga. L. 2017, p. 774, § 16/HB 323.)
The 2017 amendment, effective May 9, 2017, part of an Act to revise, modernize, and correct the Code, revised punctuation throughout the introductory paragraph of subsection (a).
- Ga. L. 2013, p. 222, § 21/HB 349, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "This Act shall become effective on July 1, 2013, and shall apply to offenses which occur on or after that date. Any offense occurring before July 1, 2013, shall be governed by the statute in effect at the time of such offense."
Ga. L. 2014, p. 780, § 5-1/SB 364, not codified by the General Assembly, provides, in part, that this Act shall apply to any sentence imposed on or after July 1, 2013.
- For article, "Appeal and Error: Appeal or Certiorari by State in Criminal Cases," see 30 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 17 (2013).
- With regard to a defendant's convictions for possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute, trafficking in 4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, commonly known as ecstasy, trafficking in cocaine, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, there was sufficient evidence to support the defendant's conviction for possession of the contraband, which was found in a backpack, based on the strong odor of marijuana coming from the vehicle in which the defendant was a passenger, the defendant's suspicious and nervous behavior, the defendant's joint living arrangement with two other defendants, the defendant's possession of ammunition for another one of the defendant's weapons, and the fact that the defendant was, at times, within arm's reach of the backpack, which showed an intent and power to exercise joint control over the backpack and the drugs found therein; likewise, there was sufficient evidence to support the trafficking charges based on the amounts of the contraband found; and, there was sufficient evidence to support the firearm possession charge since the defendant was found in possession of a magazine that fit the gun located within arm's reach. However, considering that there were four people in the vehicle, the court found that the state's evidence was insufficient to exclude the reasonable hypothesis that the marijuana was intended for personal use therefore, the conviction for the intent to distribute marijuana was reduced to possession. Vines v. State, 296 Ga. App. 543, 675 S.E.2d 260 (2009).
Sufficient evidence supported the defendant's conviction for trafficking in 3,4 methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, or "ecstasy") as the jury was authorized to find the defendant knew that a codefendant had possession of marijuana and ecstasy, and the evidence showed that the defendant allowed the codefendant to place the drugs in the trunk of the defendant's vehicle and knowingly transported the drugs in the vehicle. Jackson v. State, 314 Ga. App. 272, 724 S.E.2d 9 (2012).
- Trial court did not err under O.C.G.A. §§ 16-1-6(2) and16-1-7(a)(1) by sentencing the defendant separately for trafficking in methamphetamine, in violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-13-31, and trafficking in ecstasy, in violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-13-31.1, when the substance which was found in the defendant's vehicle tested positive for both methamphetamine and ecstasy as there was no evidence that chemical compounds or elements were shared between the drugs. Ahmad v. State, 312 Ga. App. 703, 719 S.E.2d 563 (2011).
- Convictions for violations of O.C.G.A. §§ 40 6 391(2), (4), (6), and 40 5 151 should be reported by the superior court clerk to Department of Driver Services (DDS) and violations of O.C.G.A. §§ 16 13 30(b), 16 13 31, and 16 13 31.1 should be reported to DDS only upon the clerk's determination that the conviction meets the mandate of O.C.G.A. § 40 5 54(a)(2). 2017 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 17-4.
Database error: SQLSTATE[HY000]: General error: 8 attempt to write a readonly database
This Georgia Code resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a personal injury and workers' compensation attorney admitted in Georgia (State Bar of Georgia No. 881027, since 2006) and Florida. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.