Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Code 1933, § 79A-811.2, enacted by Ga. L. 1981, p. 180, § 1; Ga. L. 1985, p. 149, § 16; Ga. L. 2015, p. 693, § 2-20/HB 233.)
- Ga. L. 2015, p. 693, § 4-1/HB 233, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act shall become effective on July 1, 2015, and shall apply to seizures of property for forfeiture that occur on or after that date. Any such seizure that occurs before July 1, 2015, shall be governed by the statute in effect at the time of such seizure."
- For article on the 2015 amendment of this Code section, see 32 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 1 (2015). For note on the Model Drug Paraphernalia Act and the Head Shop Industry, see 16 Ga. L. Rev. 137 (1981).
- Despite the almost identical caption and punishment provisions, the enactment of O.C.G.A. § 16-13-32.1 was intended to be in addition to, rather than a substitute for, the existing statute (O.C.G.A. § 16-13-32); thus, § 16-13-32.1 did not repeal § 16-13-32 by implication. State v. Gill, 173 Ga. App. 848, 328 S.E.2d 561 (1985).
State has power and authority to enact properly drawn drug paraphernalia law pursuant to the state's police power. Windfaire, Inc. v. Busbee, 523 F. Supp. 868 (N.D. Ga. 1981).
- Person violates O.C.G.A. § 16-13-32.1 only if the person personally intends object to be used for purpose prohibited by section. Windfaire, Inc. v. Busbee, 523 F. Supp. 868 (N.D. Ga. 1981).
Evidence was sufficient for a jury to find defendant guilty of ingesting methamphetamine as defendant leased a house in which a widespread methamphetamine manufacturing operation took place, which created a strong chemical smell immediately apparent upon entering the house, and defendant tested positive for methamphetamine in defendant's system, circumstantially linking the defendant to the manufacturing process and undermining the claim that the defendant was unaware of the activity. Kirby v. State, 275 Ga. App. 216, 620 S.E.2d 459 (2005).
O.C.G.A. § 16-13-32.1 is not a bill of attainder nor does the statute deny "head shops" equal protection of the law. Windfaire, Inc. v. Busbee, 523 F. Supp. 868 (N.D. Ga. 1981).
- O.C.G.A. § 16-13-32.1 is not unconstitutional on theory that the statute may be enforced only against "head shops." The statute applies to anyone who sells or advertises for sale objects which are drug-related. Windfaire, Inc. v. Busbee, 523 F. Supp. 868 (N.D. Ga. 1981).
O.C.G.A. § 16-13-32.1 does not violate U.S. Const., Art. I, Sec. VIII, Cl. III (Commerce Clause), as the statute serves a legitimate public interest, and the statute's impact on interstate commerce is minimal inasmuch as the statute affects only objects connected with unlawful intent. Burden of new law on interstate commerce is not excessive. Windfaire, Inc. v. Busbee, 523 F. Supp. 868 (N.D. Ga. 1981).
Advertisement provision of O.C.G.A. § 16-13-32.1 is not unconstitutional under U.S. Const., amend. 1, as it does not prohibit speech which describes or glorifies the drug culture. Windfaire, Inc. v. Busbee, 523 F. Supp. 868 (N.D. Ga. 1981).
Void for vagueness test is satisfied as to "sale" and "advertisement" provisions set forth in O.C.G.A. § 16-13-32.1. Windfaire, Inc. v. Busbee, 523 F. Supp. 868 (N.D. Ga. 1981).
Constitutionality of O.C.G.A. § 16-13-32.1(e), see Windfaire, Inc. v. Busbee, 523 F. Supp. 868 (N.D. Ga. 1981).
- 28 C.J.S., Drugs and Narcotics, § 263 et seq.
- Construction and application of state drug paraphernalia acts, 23 A.L.R.6th 307.
No results found for Georgia Code 16-13-32.1.