Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1939, p. 288, § 5; Code 1933, § 79A-707, enacted by Ga. L. 1967, p. 296, § 1; Ga. L. 1996, p. 356, § 7; Ga. L. 2011, p. 308, § 3/HB 457.)
- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1996, "Code Section 16-13-35" was substituted for "Code Sections 16-13-35" (now subsection (a)).
- State failed to prove that an officer's opening of a pill container found in the defendant's pocket was justified based on consent when the defendant only consented to the removal of the pill box from the defendant's pocket, and the box was not immediately identifiable as contraband. The defendant's convictions on controlled substances charges were reversed. McCormack v. State, 325 Ga. App. 183, 751 S.E.2d 904 (2013).
Cited in Thackston v. State, 178 Ga. App. 408, 343 S.E.2d 171 (1986); Black v. State, 194 Ga. App. 660, 391 S.E.2d 432 (1990).
- Construction of provision of Uniform Narcotic Drug Act requiring a physician's prescription as a prerequisite to a pharmacist's sale of narcotics, 10 A.L.R.3d 560.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-07-11
Citation: 712 S.E.2d 850, 289 Ga. 540, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 2178, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 559
Snippet: particular, in construing OCGA §§ 16-13-30(a) and 16-13-75 not to require the defendant to know that the