Syfert Injury Law Firm
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448For the purpose of proving the existence of a criminal street gang and criminal gang activity, the commission, adjudication, or conviction of any offense enumerated in paragraph (1) of Code Section 16-15-3 by any member or associate of a criminal street gang shall be admissible in any trial or proceeding. Evidence offered under this Code section shall not be subject to the restrictions in paragraph (22) of Code Section 24-8-803.
(Code 1981, §16-15-9, enacted by Ga. L. 2006, p. 519, § 3/HB 1302; Ga. L. 2010, p. 230, § 5/HB 1015; Ga. L. 2016, p. 811, § 5/HB 874.)
The 2016 amendment, effective May 3, 2016, in the first sentence, substituted "For the purpose of proving the existence of a criminal street gang and criminal gang activity, the commission, adjudication, or conviction" for "The commission", deleted "for the purpose of proving the existence of the criminal street gang and criminal gang activity" following "proceeding" at the end, and added the second sentence.
- Ga. L. 2006, p. 519, § 7/HB 1302, not codified by the General Assembly, provided that this section shall be effective July 1, 2006, and shall be applicable to all crimes committed on or after such date, and also provided that: "Any offense committed before July 1, 2006, shall be punishable as provided by the statute in effect at the time the offense was committed."
- For annual survey on criminal law, see 68 Mercer L. Rev. 93 (2016).
O.C.G.A. § 16-15-9 was declared unconstitutional on the statute's face under the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause to the extent that the statute authorized the admission of the convictions of non-testifying non-parties as evidence of a criminal street gang; the exclusion of other alleged gang members' convictions in the defendant's trial was upheld. State v. Jefferson, 302 Ga. 435, 807 S.E.2d 387 (2017).
- Trial court did not err by admitting into evidence the defendant's prior conviction for criminal street gang activity as the jury was instructed that the evidence could only be considered for the determination of whether the defendant was currently guilty of criminal gang activity, and not the remaining counts of the indictment. Brown v. State, 300 Ga. 446, 796 S.E.2d 283 (2017).
Trial court did not err in admitting evidence that several months prior to the incident in the current case, the defendant was in possession of one or two guns because the evidence of the incident was relevant to show that while a member of a gang the defendant committed a criminal offense involving possession of a weapon as the defendant was a convicted felon at the time of the prior incident. Lang v. State, 344 Ga. App. 623, 812 S.E.2d 16 (2018).
- Sufficient evidence, including expert testimony, supported the appellants' convictions because the evidence established that the appellants were associated with a criminal street gang and that the armed robbery and aggravated assault the appellants engaged in constituted criminal street gang activity and were intended to further the interests of the gang. Lupoe v. State, 300 Ga. 233, 794 S.E.2d 67 (2016).
Database error: SQLSTATE[HY000]: General error: 8 attempt to write a readonly database
This Georgia Code resource is curated by Georgia Bar member Graham W. Syfert, a personal injury and workers' compensation attorney admitted in Georgia (State Bar of Georgia No. 881027, since 2006) and Florida. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.