Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 16-3-23.1 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 16 CRIMES AND OFFENSES

Section 3. Defenses to Criminal Prosecutions, 16-3-1 through 16-3-40.

ARTICLE 2 JUSTIFICATION AND EXCUSE

16-3-23.1. No duty to retreat prior to use of force in self-defense.

A person who uses threats or force in accordance with Code Section 16-3-21, relating to the use of force in defense of self or others, Code Section 16-3-23, relating to the use of force in defense of a habitation, or Code Section 16-3-24, relating to the use of force in defense of property other than a habitation, has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and use force as provided in said Code sections, including deadly force.

(Code 1981, §16-3-23.1, enacted by Ga. L. 2006, p. 477, § 1/SB 396.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Reversible error in failing to charge jury on lack of duty to retreat.

- Trial court committed reversible error in failing to charge the jury on the lack of a duty to retreat under O.C.G.A. § 16-3-23.1 because self-defense, O.C.G.A. § 16-3-21(a), was the defendant's sole defense, and the issue of retreat was squarely placed in issue by the prosecutor's cross-examination of the defendant, by the defendant's explanation of why the defendant did not drive away from the victim, whom the defendant characterized as the aggressor, and by the prosecutor's closing argument; the evidence of the defendant's guilt was not overwhelming, given that the case turned solely on the credibility of the defendant, the victim, and the other witnesses. Hill v. State, 310 Ga. App. 695, 713 S.E.2d 891 (2011).

Plain error not shown for failing to charge on no duty to retreat.

- Under a plain error analysis in the defendant's trial for murder, the trial court did not err when the court failed to charge the jury that one acting in defense of self has no duty to retreat because the jury charges given in the case fairly informed the jury as to the law of self-defense and the defendant failed to affirmatively show that the failure to charge on the duty to retreat probably affected the outcome of the trial. Shaw v. State, 292 Ga. 871, 742 S.E.2d 707 (2013).

Cited in Webb v. State, 284 Ga. 122, 663 S.E.2d 690 (2008).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

- Construction and application of "make my day" and "stand your ground" statutes, 76 A.L.R.6th 1.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 16-3-23.1

Total Results: 20  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Bates v. State, 313 Ga. 57 (Ga. 2021).

Cited 29 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Dec 14, 2021

Copy

State v. COPELAND (Three Cases), 850 S.E.2d 736 (Ga. 2020).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 2, 2020 | 310 Ga. 345

...When the person claiming immunity uses force intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm, that 10 OCGA § 16-3-24.2 also provides that a person who uses threats or force in defense of habitation under OCGA § 16-3-23, in defense of property other than habitation under OCGA § 16-3-24, or under OCGA § 16-3-23.1 (no duty to retreat) is immune from prosecution....
...with OCGA § 16-3-21 such that they should be granted immunity from prosecution. To qualify for immunity, the deputies were required by OCGA § 16-3-24.2 to show that they “use[d] threats or force in accordance with Code Section 16-3-21, 16-3-23, 16-3-23.1, or 16-3-24[.]” However, our review of the trial court’s immunity order leads us to conclude that, in making its determination, the trial court conflated principles found in OCGA § 16-3-20 (2)15 and (4),16 which are not refe...
Copy

Jackson v. The State (two Cases), 897 S.E.2d 785 (Ga. 2024).

Cited 13 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 6, 2024 | 318 Ga. 393

Copy

Hughes v. State, 861 S.E.2d 94 (Ga. 2021).

Cited 13 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jul 7, 2021 | 312 Ga. 149

...necessary to prevent death or great bodily injury to himself[.]” Id. In defending himself, he “has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his . . . ground and use force as provided in [OCGA § 16-3-21], including deadly force.” OCGA § 16-3-23.1....
...Appellant argues, however, that the trial court’s repeated 21 references to his failure to retreat undermine its denial of his motion for immunity by showing that the court improperly relied on Appellant’s failure to retreat. Although OCGA § 16-3-23.1 “clearly provides that a person who is authorized to use force to defend himself is under no obligation to retreat, regardless of whether retreating may have been a more reasonable option,” Arnold, 302 Ga....
Copy

Redding v. State, 858 S.E.2d 469 (Ga. 2021).

Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | May 17, 2021 | 311 Ga. 757

...homicide where the danger apprehended is not urgent and pressing, or apparently so, at the time of the killing. (Citations and punctuation omitted; emphasis in original.) Carter v. State, 285 Ga. 565, 566 (2) (678 SE2d 909) (2009); see also OCGA §§ 16-3-21, 16-3-23.1; Rammage v....
...video recordings of the incident, which also fail to support a claim that Varner was the aggressor at the time of the shooting. No evidence supports Redding’s claim that Varner was the aggressor, and he therefore was not entitled to a jury instruction under OCGA § 16-3-23.1. This Court further held in Hoffler that even assuming that some evidence existed that Hoffler was not the original aggressor, reversal was not required because his “defense of self-defense was fairly presented to the jury, an...
Copy

Whittaker v. State, 891 S.E.2d 849 (Ga. 2023).

Cited 11 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Aug 21, 2023 | 317 Ga. 127

...punctuation omitted)). Thus, this claim fails. 3. Whittaker contends that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury that he had no duty to retreat before using deadly 13 force in self-defense. See OCGA § 16-3-23.1.5 Because he did not object to the trial court’s failure to give this instruction, he must show that the omission amounted to plain error....
Copy

Reese v. State, 891 S.E.2d 835 (Ga. 2023).

Cited 10 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Aug 21, 2023 | 317 Ga. 189

Copy

Gude v. State, 874 S.E.2d 84 (Ga. 2022).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 1, 2022 | 313 Ga. 859

...or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony. Finally, [a] person who uses threats or force in accordance with Code Section 16-3-21 . . . has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his . . . ground and use force as provided in said Code section[ ], including deadly force. OCGA § 16-3-23.1. With regard to the timing of Gude’s motion, as we have previously discussed, [a]lthough nothing in the language of OCGA § 16-3-24.2 requires an immunity motion to be filed pretrial, such motions are general...
Copy

Priester v. State, 317 Ga. 477 (Ga. 2023).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 11, 2023

... instructed the jury on justification, self-defense, “stand your ground,” and defense of habitation. See OCGA § 16-3-21 (a) (“A person is justified in . . . using force against another when . . . necessary to defend himself or herself or a third person. . . .”);14 OCGA § 16-3-23.1 (providing that a person who used force “in defense of self or others” or “in defense of a habitation ....
...death or great bodily harm only if he or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent death or great bodily injury to himself or herself or a third person or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony. 15 OCGA § 16-3-23.1 says in full: A person who uses threats or force in accordance with Code Section 16-3-21, relating to the use of force in defense of self or others, Code Section 16-3-23, relating to the use of force in defense...
...the defense team did not feel “comfort” in Priester testifying. Priester has not shown that this was unreasonable trial strategy, 19 OCGA § 16-3-24.2 says: “A person who uses threats or force in accordance with Code Section 16-3-21, 16-3-23, 16-3-23.1, or 16-3-24 shall be immune from criminal prosecution therefor unless in the use of deadly force, such person utilizes a weapon the carrying or possession of which is unlawful by such person under Part 2 of Article 4 of Chapter 11 of this t...
Copy

Nesbit v. State, 321 Ga. 240 (Ga. 2025).

Cited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 4, 2025

Copy

Reddick v. State, 911 S.E.2d 638 (Ga. 2025).

Cited 5 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jan 28, 2025 | 321 Ga. 73

...failed to consider and rule on his claim that he was acting in defense of habitation. The record does not support this claim of error. 4 OCGA § 16-3-24.2 provides: A person who uses threats or force in accordance with Code Section 16-3-20, 16-3-21, 16-3-23, 16-3-23.1, 16-3-24, or 17-4-20 shall be immune from criminal prosecution therefor unless in the use of deadly force, such person utilizes a weapon the carrying or possession of which is unlawful by such person under Part 2 of Arti...
Copy

Beard v. State, 317 Ga. 842 (Ga. 2023).

Cited 5 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Dec 19, 2023

...To authorize a jury instruction, there must be at least “slight evidence” supporting the instruction. Munn v. State, 313 Ga. 716, 722 (873 SE2d 166) (2022). Appellant asserts that the trial court obviously erred in failing to instruct the jury on OCGA § 16-3-23.1, which says: A person who uses threats or force in accordance with Code Section 16-3-21, relating to the use of force in defense of self or others, Code Section 16-3-23, relating to the use of force in d...
Copy

Russell v. State, 905 S.E.2d 578 (Ga. 2024).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Aug 13, 2024 | 319 Ga. 556

...deficient performance, the result of the case would have been different. See 3 At the time of the crime, OCGA § 16-3-24.2 stated: A person who uses threats or force in accordance with Code Section 16-3-21, 16-3-23, 16-3-23.1, or 16-3-24 shall be immune from criminal prosecution therefor unless in the use of deadly force, such person utilizes a weapon the carrying or possession of which is unlawful by such person under Part 2 of Article 4 of Chapter 11 of this title. See also Ga....
Copy

Gold v. State, 902 S.E.2d 593 (Ga. 2024).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | May 29, 2024 | 319 Ga. 149

...force he or she reasonably believes to be necessary.” See Georgia Suggested Pattern Jury Instructions, Vol. II: Criminal Cases §§ 3.10.10; 3.10.13. These charges were a correct statement of the law, see OCGA §§ 16-3-20 (1); 16-3-21 (a); 16-3-23.1, and, given the evidence presented, the trial court did not err in also giving the suggested pattern jury instruction on excessive force as part of its broader instructions on self-defense....
Copy

Rana v. State, 907 S.E.2d 674 (Ga. 2024).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 15, 2024 | 320 Ga. 66

Copy

Craft v. State, 321 Ga. 638 (Ga. 2025).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | May 28, 2025

Copy

Harris v. State, 886 S.E.2d 790 (Ga. 2023).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Apr 18, 2023 | 316 Ga. 141

...6 Harris led officers to several different areas where he claimed that he threw the gun, but they were unable to locate it. 7 OCGA § 16-3-24.2 provides: A person who uses threats or force in accordance with Code Section 16-3-21, 16-3-23, 16-3-23.1, or 16-3-24 shall be immune from criminal prosecution therefor unless in the use of deadly force, such person utilizes a weapon the carrying or possession of which is unlawful by such person under Part 2 of Article 4 of...
Copy

State v. Hylton, 914 S.E.2d 295 (Ga. 2025).

Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 18, 2025 | 321 Ga. 292

...a trial court’s order granting or denying immunity to include explicit factual findings or conclusions of law. See OCGA § 16-3-24.2 (providing that “[a] person who uses threats or force in accordance with Code Section 16-3-20, 16-3-21, 16-3-23, 16-3-23.1, 16-3-24, or 17-4-20 shall be immune from criminal prosecution therefor unless in the use of deadly force, such person utilizes a weapon the carrying or possession of which is unlawful by such person under Part 2 of Article 4 of Chapter 11 of this title”)....

Nesbit v. State (Ga. 2025).

Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 4, 2025 | 321 Ga. 292

Bates v. State (Ga. 2021).

Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Dec 14, 2021 | 321 Ga. 292