O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 16-5-73 (2019)

Prohibition against presence of children during manufacture of methamphetamine; punishment

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) As used in this Code section, the term: (1) ‘‘Chemical substance’’ means anhydrous ammonia, as defined in Code Section 16-11-111; ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine, as those terms are defined in Code Section 16-13-30.3; or any other chemical used in the manufacture of methamphetamine. (2) ‘‘Child’’ means any individual who is under the age of 18 years. (3) ‘‘Intent to manufacture’’ means but is not limited to the intent to manufacture methamphetamine, which may be demonstrated by a chemical substance’s usage, quantity, or manner or method of storage, including but not limited to storing it in proximity to another

chemical substance or equipment used to manufacture methamphetamine. (4) ‘‘Methamphetamine’’ means methamphetamine, amphetamine, or any mixture containing either methamphetamine or amphetamine, as described in Code Section 16-13-26. (5) ‘‘Serious injury’’ means an injury involving a broken bone, the loss of a member of the body, the loss of use of a member of the body, the substantial disfigurement of the body or of a member of the body, or an injury which is life threatening. (b)(1) Any person who intentionally causes or permits a child to be present where any person is manufacturing methamphetamine or possessing a chemical substance with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two nor more than 15 years. (2) Any person who violates paragraph (1) of this subsection wherein a child receives serious injury as a result of such violation shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five nor more than 20 years.

History

Code 1981, § 16-5-73, enacted by Ga. L. 2004, p. 57, § 4; Ga. L. 2005, p. 60, § 16/HB 95.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - Ga. L. 2004, p. 57, § 6, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the amendment by that Act

shall apply to all crimes which occur on or after July 1, 2004. Law reviews. - For article on 2004 enactment of this Code section, see 21 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 45 (2004).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Confession properly admitted. - Trial court did not err in finding that the defendant freely and voluntarily made a statement to police admitting that the defendant knew methamphetamine was being manufactured in the garage a few feet from the defendant’s three-month-old child because the defendant was advised of the Miranda rights, waived the right to counsel, and agreed to speak with the investigator and during that conversation made the admission. Blackwell v. State, 337 Ga. App. 173, 786 S.E.2d 552 (2016). Evidence sufficient to support conviction. - Evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant of manufacturing methamphetamine in the presence of a child because the defendant’s daughter was six years old at the time the residence

was searched and evidence of the methamphetamine lab was found; items used for the manufacture of methamphetamine and methamphetamine were found in the residence; and, although the daughter apparently lived with the grandparents, the daughter visited the residence as many as three times per week and maintained a bedroom there. Cummings v. State, 345 Ga. App. 702, 814 S.E.2d 806 (2018), cert. denied, 2018 Ga. LEXIS 728 (Ga. 2018). Reversal warranted. - While there was sufficient evidence that the defendant permitted the child to be present where methamphetamine was being manufactured by the defendant’s mother, the defendant was entitled to reversal of that conviction, because defense counsel was ineffective in failing to object when the

state presented evidence of the defendant’s alleged participation in a pill ring as a similar transaction. Hutchins v.

State, 326 Ga. App. 250, 756 S.E.2d 347 (2014).

ARTICLE 6 FETICIDE

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 2011–2018 · leading case: Hutchins v. State, 756 S.E.2d 347 (Ga. Ct. App. 2014).
Hutchins v. State, 756 S.E.2d 347 (Ga. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 8× “5 (a) (2), pertaining to the use or conveyance of certain substances used in the manufacture of controlled substances; 1 and OCGA § 16-5-73 (b) (1), pertaining to the presence of children during the manufacture of methamphetamine.”
Hall v. State, 709 S.E.2d 910 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 6× “Hall was charged with one count of trafficking in methamphetamine by manufacturing less than 200 grams of the drug (OCGA § 16-13-31 (f) (1)), three counts of permitting a child to be present during the manufacture of methamphetamine (OCGA § 16-5-73 (b)), one count of possession…”
The State v. Barrow, 772 S.E.2d 802 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “, concur. 1 The State nolle prossed one count of methamphetamine trafficking (OCGA § 16-13-31 (f) (1)) and one count of manufacturing methamphetamine in the presence of a child (OCGA § 16-5-73).”
Cummings v. State, 814 S.E.2d 806 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 10× “OCGA § 16-5-73 (b) (1) provides that any person who intentionally causes or permits a child to be present where any person is manufacturing methamphetamine or possessing a chemical substance with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine shall be guilty of a felony and, upon…”
Blackwell v. State, 786 S.E.2d 552 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 16-5-73 (b) (1) (“Any person who intentionally causes or permits a child to be present where any person is manufacturing methamphetamine.”
Amanda Michelle Cummings v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 10× “3 OCGA § 16-5-73. 4 OCGA § 16-13-2 (b). 5 of the charges against her.”
Amanda Hutchins v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 8× “5 (a) (2), pertaining to the use or conveyance of certain substances used in the manufacture of controlled substances;1 and OCGA § 16-5-73 (b) (1), pertaining to the presence of children during the manufacture of methamphetamine.”
Ryan Blackwell v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “” Before admitting a confession, the trial court must consider the totality of the circumstances and assess whether the defendant made the statement 2 See OCGA § 16-5-73 (b) (1) (“Any person who intentionally causes or permits a child to be present where any person is…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.