Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §16-13-30.3, enacted by Ga. L. 2003, p. 177, § 3; Ga. L. 2005, p. 194, § 1/HB 216; Ga. L. 2006, p. 72, § 16/SB 465; Ga. L. 2007, p. 47, § 16/SB 103; Ga. L. 2016, p. 273, § 1/HB 362.)
The 2016 amendment, effective July 1, 2016, rewrote this Code section.
- Listed chemical wholesale distributor, Official Compilation of the Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia, Georgia State Board of Pharmacy, Ch. 480-7A.
- For article on the 2016 amendment of this Code section, see 33 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 97 (2016).
- O.C.G.A. § 16-13-30.3(b)(1) was constitutional as it created classifications between those possessing 300 or less individual units of the substances listed, and those possessing more than 300 units; the classifications had a rational basis in combating the illicit drug trade as the Georgia legislature determined that possession of 300 or less individual units served a legitimate health concern, while possession of more than 300 individual units did not. Rochefort v. State, 279 Ga. 738, 620 S.E.2d 803 (2005).
O.C.G.A. § 16-13-30.3(b)(1) was not unconstitutionally vague as "ephedrine," "pseudoephedrine," and "phenylpro- panolamine" were so similar to one another that each was considered a functional equivalent of the others. Rochefort v. State, 279 Ga. 738, 620 S.E.2d 803 (2005).
- Evidence supported defendant's conviction for possession of more than 300 tablets of ephedrine as: (1) the equal access rule did not apply as defendant made inculpatory admissions that authorized a finding that defendant possessed the substances; (2) the random testing of two of the 2,329 tablets supported the conviction as an expert examined the remainder of the tablets, stated that they had the same logo and appearance, and opined that all of the tablets contained pseudoephedrine; and (3) there was not a fatal variance, even though the accusation charged defendant with possession of more than 300 tablets of ephedrine, but the proof showed that the tablets contained pseudoephedrine, as for purposes of O.C.G.A. § 16-13-30.3, "ephedrine" and "pseudoephedrine" were synonymous. Rochefort v. State, 279 Ga. 738, 620 S.E.2d 803 (2005).
Convictions of manufacture, distribution, and possession of methamphetamine with the intent to distribute under O.C.G.A. § 16-13-30(b), possession of ephedrine/pseudoephedrine under O.C.G.A. § 16-13-30.3(b)(1), and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-106(b)(4) were supported by the evidence. A panel van belonging to the defendant had been modified as a methamphetamine lab, was located on the defendant's property, and was powered by an electrical cord running from the defendant's trailer; everything necessary to support the production of methamphetamine was present in the vicinity of the vehicle; the defendant's name and that of the defendant's spouse had been scrawled on an interior panel of the vehicle; the defendant offered to provide any methamphetamine that a house guest wanted; uncured methamphetamine and enough ephedrine was present at the scene to make 30 to 33 grams of methamphetamine; and the defendant admitted to giving methamphetamine to others and to owning the sawed-off shotgun recovered from the panel van. Boone v. State, 293 Ga. App. 654, 667 S.E.2d 880 (2008).
- Crimes set forth in O.C.G.A. §§ 16-13-30.3(b)(2) and16-13-32.2, with regard to possessing objects or materials of any kind for the purpose of manufacturing or preparing a controlled substance, are lesser included offenses of the crime of trafficking by manufacture of methamphetamine under O.C.G.A. § 16-13-31(f). Franks v. State, 325 Ga. App. 488, 758 S.E.2d 604 (2013).
Because the possession of pseudoephedrine and possession of a drug-related object required proof of elements not required for the crime of trafficking, those crimes were not lesser included offenses of the crime of trafficking in methamphetamine as indicted, and the trial court did not err in denying the second defendant's requested charges on lesser included offenses. Long v. State, 325 Ga. App. 488, 758 S.E.2d 604 (2013).
- Defendant's conviction for attempted trafficking by manufacturing methamphetamine was reversed because the evidence was not overwhelming as to the charge of trafficking, thus, it could not be said that it was harmless error for the trial court to refuse to instruct the jury on the lesser included offenses requested by the defendant. Franks v. State, 325 Ga. App. 488, 758 S.E.2d 604 (2013).
Cited in Smith v. State, 289 Ga. App. 236, 656 S.E.2d 574 (2008).
- O.C.G.A. § 16-13-30.3 is an offense for which those charged with a violation are to be fingerprinted. 2006 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 2006-2.
Total Results: 3
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-03-17
Citation: 294 Ga. 818, 756 S.E.2d 529, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 536, 2014 WL 998736, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 224
Snippet: individual may procure. See, e.g.,21USC§ 830(d);OCGA § 16-13-30.3 (b) (1), (2). 17 In particular
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2005-10-11
Citation: 620 S.E.2d 803, 279 Ga. 738, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 3146, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 665
Snippet: challenge to the constitutionality of OCGA § 16-13-30.3(b)(1). The trial court denied the motion, and
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1995-02-13
Citation: 264 Ga. 892, 453 S.E.2d 18, 1995 Ga. LEXIS 62
Snippet: regard to the operation of a motor vehicle, OCGA § 16-13-30.3 We find no merit in this enumeration of error