O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 16-8-19 (2019)

Conversion of leased personal property

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Reserved. Repealed by Ga. L. 1988, p. 763, § 2, effective July 1, 1988.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - This Code section was based on Ga. L. 1968, p. 1048, § 1; Ga. L. 1969, p. 857, § 9. For present

comparable provisions, see Code Section 16-8-4(a).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1986–2006 · leading case: State v. Russell, 350 S.E.2d 430 (Ga. 1986).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Russell, 350 S.E.2d 430 (Ga. 1986). · cites it 34× “The state contends that the trial court erred in holding that the statute creates a mandatory presumption of intent.”

Laster v. Star Rental, Inc., 378 S.E.2d 320 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 22× “(Star) seeking damages arising from the issuance of a warrant for her arrest for violation of OCGA § 16-8-19 pursuant to an affidavit from Star’s employee, Anthony Tucker.”

Sherrod v. State, 627 S.E.2d 36 (Ga. 2006). · cites it 2× “” Although the wording of the current statute is slightly different, it has the same improper effect as the statute addressed in Russell; it mandates the finding of all the elements of the crime when the State proves only certain basic facts.”

Laster v. Star Rental, Inc., 353 S.E.2d 37 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “One of the counts alleged that appellant had been maliciously prosecuted for the criminal conversion of leased property, a violation of OCGA § 16-8-19. Discovery in the instant case established that, on the day set for her preliminary hearing on the criminal charge, appellant,…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.