Misdemeanor prosecutions.

- O.C.G.A. § 17-11-1 applies to misdemeanor prosecutions. Gibson v. State, 187 Ga. App. 769, 371 S.E.2d 413, cert. denied, 187 Ga. App. 907, 371 S.E.2d 413 (1988).

"Trial" defined.

- "Trial" means such trial in the court having original trial jurisdiction of the case as is the basis of the entry of judgment finally disposing of the action in such court and does not apply to proceedings in an appellate court. Wynne v. Stonecypher, 146 Ga. 5, 90 S.E. 284 (1916).

Judge has no discretion in the matter of taxing costs.

- While the word "may" ordinarily denotes permission and not command, the use of that word in the second sentence of this section cannot be construed to mean that the trial judge is vested with discretion in the matter of taxing the costs against the convicted defendant. There is no provision of law for the payment of the fees of the officers of the court when the judge in the judge's discretion fails to tax the costs against the convicted defendant, and it cannot be assumed that it was ever intended that the compensation of these officers should rest in the discretion of the judge. Pound v. Faulkner, 193 Ga. 413, 18 S.E.2d 749 (1942).

Judge's duty to enter judgment for costs.

- Since the law allows the judge no discretion as to entering judgment for costs against the convicted defendant, but imposes the burden of paying costs as an incident to conviction, the verdict of guilty against the defendant imposes upon the judge the duty of entering judgment against the defendant for the costs. Pound v. Faulkner, 193 Ga. 413, 18 S.E.2d 749 (1942).

Amendment of judgment to provide for costs.

- If a defendant is convicted, but the judge fails to enter a judgment for costs, it is proper for the judge to enter a nunc pro tunc order amending the former judgment to provide for the payment of costs after the expiration of the term at which the judgment was entered, and even after an execution for the costs has issued. Pound v. Faulkner, 193 Ga. 413, 18 S.E.2d 749 (1942).

Judgment for other costs illegal.

- It is illegal for a magistrate to give judgment against the prisoner for costs other than those of the prisoner's own witnesses or the prisoner's commitment. Hayden v. State, 40 Ga. 476 (1869).

Costs of bailiffs and jurors are not taxable to criminal defendants. Walden v. State, 258 Ga. 503, 371 S.E.2d 852 (1988); Smith v. State, 262 Ga. 67, 414 S.E.2d 653 (1992).

Fees paid for special grand jurors, traverse jurors, and bailiffs could not properly be included in the sum which the defendant was ordered to pay the defendant's victim as restitution. Martin v. State, 189 Ga. App. 483, 376 S.E.2d 888 (1988).

Assessment of court costs.

- Sum which convicted defendant was ordered to pay represented court costs, rather than fine, which trial court is allowed to assess. Carpenter v. State, 167 Ga. App. 634, 307 S.E.2d 19 (1983), aff'd, 252 Ga. 79, 310 S.E.2d 912 (1984).

Costs in cases which have been nol prossed.

- No officer has the right to demand or receive of one accused of crime costs on a criminal case which has been nol prossed. Hunter v. State, 104 Ga. App. 576, 122 S.E.2d 172 (1961).

If acquitted on subsequent trial no longer liable for costs.

- If one accused of crime is convicted but, upon a subsequent trial granted, is thereafter acquitted, the defendant is no longer liable for the costs. Land v. Jolley, 175 Ga. 788, 166 S.E. 217 (1932).

Amount paid by defendant who is eventually acquitted is without consideration.

- Due bill given by the defendant to the clerk in settlement of a bill for costs before there had been any conviction of the accused, who was eventually acquitted, was without legal consideration. Wells v. Potter, 120 Ga. 889, 48 S.E. 354 (1904).

Costs to which district attorney entitled if defendant escapes.

- If a prisoner escapes before trial, the solicitor general (now district attorney) is only entitled to the costs which have accrued up to the time of such escape. Robinson v. Smith, 57 Ga. 332 (1876).

Witness costs.

- Payment of hotel and airline ticket costs for witnesses come within the meaning of "all costs accruing in the . . . trial courts." Smith v. State, 236 Ga. App. 548, 512 S.E.2d 19 (1999).

There is no specific statutory authorization for assessing a criminal defendant for the lodging and airfare costs of witnesses for the state. Smith v. State, 272 Ga. 83, 526 S.E.2d 59 (2000).

Procedure for objecting to amounts claimed by witnesses.

- If the clerk issues an execution for the costs due witnesses, and the defendant meets the execution with an affidavit of illegality on the ground that the witnesses have claimed and procured the execution to issue for more fees than the witnesses are entitled to receive, it is incumbent upon the defendant to pay amounts appearing to be due in order to authorize the levying officer to stay further proceedings. State v. Everett, 93 Ga. 575, 20 S.E. 73 (1894).

Costs may not be demanded before providing transcript for appeal, if trial not had.

- If the accused excepts to the overruling of a demurrer (now motion to dismiss) to the indictment, and brings the case to the Supreme Court before there has been any trial on the merits, the clerk of the court in which the case is pending has no right to demand, as a condition precedent to sending up a transcript of the record, the payment of accrued costs. Wells v. Potter, 120 Ga. 889, 48 S.E. 354 (1904).

If no supersedeas is obtained, the clerk of the trial court is entitled to have judgment awarded against the defendant for the costs accruing in connection with the defendant's prosecution of a writ of error (see O.C.G.A. §§ 5-6-49,5-6-50) to the Court of Appeals, while the defendant's case is pending in that court. Wynne v. Stonecypher, 146 Ga. 5, 90 S.E. 284 (1916).

Costs are not recoverable in proceeding to recover forfeited recognizance.

- Costs of the criminal case out of which a recognizance arises are not recoverable in a proceeding by scire facias to enforce the recognizance as forfeited. When such costs have been taxed in the judgment rendered in the scire facias proceeding a motion to retax, so as to exclude from that judgment these nontaxable costs, should be granted. Cade v. Gordon, 88 Ga. 461, 14 S.E. 706 (1892).

Imprisonment for failure to pay costs.

- One adjudged guilty of a misdemeanor and sentenced to pay the costs of the prosecution, and in default of the payment thereof to be confined in the chain gang for a stated term, cannot be held in custody or compelled to labor on the chain gang for fees due officers of court for services which the officers were required by law to render in proceedings instituted by that person, subsequently to the person's conviction and sentence, to review and reverse such judgment and sentence, though liable under the judgment for such fees as costs. Alexander v. Walton, 151 Ga. 645, 107 S.E. 862 (1921).

Extent and priority of lien generally.

- All the property of a person arrested and convicted upon a criminal charge, or who may escape from jail, or from any officer, owned by the person at the time of the arrest, is bound for the costs of prosecution, by statutory lien, which attaches also upon the proceeds of the property, when identified. This lien overrides a title to property made by the person, upon the sale for professional services, after the person's arrest and before conviction. Morgan v. Collier, 13 Ga. 493 (1853).

Costs are collectible by levy of fi. fa.

- Costs in a criminal prosecution are collectible of the defendant by the levy of a fi. fa. at the termination of a prosecution, if it finally results in the conviction of the defendant. Land v. Jolley, 175 Ga. 788, 166 S.E. 217 (1932).

Judge has the power to order the clerk to issue an execution against the property of the defendant to enforce the collection of the fine and costs. McMeekin v. State, 48 Ga. 335 (1873).

Lien for costs puts purchasers on notice.

- If the vendor of an interest in real property is in prison, the vendee is put on notice of the lien for costs, or notice of a fact which, if diligently investigated, would have disclosed the lien. Pound v. Faulkner, 193 Ga. 413, 18 S.E.2d 749 (1942).

Cost of paternity blood test in child abandonment case.

- When the state requests pretrial paternity blood testing for a defendant charged with child abandonment, the state must initially pay the cost. A verdict incorporating a finding of parentage would authorize the court to tax the cost of the blood test against the defendant, or under certain circumstances against the prosecutor/prosecutrix or complainant. State v. Slavny, 195 Ga. App. 818, 395 S.E.2d 56 (1990).

Cited in Lumpkin County v. Davis, 185 Ga. 393, 195 S.E. 169 (1938); Holloway v. State, 178 Ga. App. 141, 342 S.E.2d 363 (1986); Alliston v. State, 183 Ga. App. 462, 359 S.E.2d 220 (1987).

Court of inquiry is not trial.

- This section meant that the costs allowed an officer cannot be collected from a defendant until after the defendant's conviction on trial, and the court of inquiry was not the trial. 1950-51 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 265.

Costs of feeding prisoner while prisoner is imprisoned awaiting trial are part of court costs collectible from defendant. 1962 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 121.

Application fee for warrant.

- Fee for application for an arrest or search warrant under O.C.G.A. § 15-10-82 is not part of the costs. 1988 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U88-24.

Fee for issuance of criminal warrant.

- Affiant (prosecutor) may not be required to pay the fee for the issuance of a criminal warrant at the time of such issuance. A clear intent is shown to determine the responsibility for such payment at a subsequent time, rather than at the time of the issuance of the criminal warrant. 1969 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 69-364.

Claim of county for fees of county officers.

- In cases which are never signed by the defendant or a judge, which are not nol prossed and which are transmitted to the clerk's office prior to the return of the indictment against the officer, the county does not have a claim for any portion of the money received in the clerk's office from an officer of the court based on chargeable fees of the county's officers. 1974 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U74-90.

ALR.

- Validity of employment to obtain evidence, 16 A.L.R. 1433.

Validity of contract to testify, 41 A.L.R. 1322; 45 A.L.R. 1423.

Power of court which appoints or employs expert witnesses to tax their fees as costs, 39 A.L.R.2d 1376.

Right of witness detained in custody for future appearance to fees for such detention, 50 A.L.R.2d 1439.

Appealability of order or judgment awarding or denying costs but making no other adjudication, 54 A.L.R.2d 927.

Items of cost of prosecution for which defendant may be held, 65 A.L.R.2d 854.

Indigency of offender as affecting validity of imprisonment as alternative to payment of fine, 31 A.L.R.3d 926.

Storage or similar caretaking charges as taxable costs in proceeding to forfeit personal property, 60 A.L.R.3d 813.