Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §17-12-22, enacted by Ga. L. 2003, p. 191, § 1; Ga. L. 2008, p. 846, § 29/HB 1245; Ga. L. 2010, p. 226, § 2A/HB 889; Ga. L. 2011, p. 91, § 11/HB 238.)
The 2011 amendment, effective July 1, 2011, in subsection (a), in the beginning of the first sentence, inserted "director, with input from the" and inserted a comma, and substituted "director" for "council" in the third and fourth sentences; and deleted ", regulations," following "qualifications" near the end of subsection (c).
- For survey article on criminal law, see 59 Mercer L. Rev. 89 (2007).
- O.C.G.A. § 17-12-22 of the Indigent Defense Act of 2003, O.C.G.A. § 17-12-1 et seq., did not remove a trial court's authority to determine whether a conflict of interest between an indigent criminal defendant and a public defender who was assigned to represent the defendant's interest required withdrawal of the defender as it only removed the appointment of assigned counsel from the trial court's authority; there was no conflict between § 17-12-22 and Ga. Unif. Super. Ct. R. 4.3, as § 17-12-22 was enacted to facilitate the identification of conflicts before a public defender undertook representation, and when a conflict arose or was discovered after representation had commenced, a trial court still had authority to determine the issue of withdrawal. Odum v. State, 283 Ga. App. 291, 641 S.E.2d 279 (2007).
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-03-15
Snippet: office has a conflict of interest. See OCGA § 17-12-22 (b). Such attorneys must meet the requirements
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-02-05
Citation: 642 S.E.2d 28, 281 Ga. 601, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 272, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 132
Snippet: Pindar's Ga. Real Estate Law and Proc. §§ 12-14, 12-17, 12-22, 12-24, 12-33, 12-34 (6th ed.2004). It is axiomatic