O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 17-13-37 (2019)

Procedure where accused not arrested within time specified in warrant

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If the accused is not arrested under warrant of the Governor by the expiration of the time specified in the warrant or bond, a judge or magistrate may discharge him or may recommit him for a further period not to exceed 60 days, or a judge or magistrate may again take bail for his appearance and surrender as provided for in Code Section 17-13-36, but within a period not to exceed 60 days after the date of such new bond.

History

Ga. L. 1951, p. 726, § 17.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Purpose. - Purpose of Ga. L. 1951, p. 726, §§ 15-17 (see O.C.G.A. §§ 17-13-35 17-13-37) of the extradition law is to prevent unreasonably lengthy periods of confinement of fugitives pending consummation of extradition proceedings by the demanding state. There is, however, no indication of any legislative intent to restrict the period within which the Governor of another state may issue a rendition warrant to the period within which the court which issues the fugitive warrant may commit the accused or require the accused to give bond. Stynchcombe v. Whitley, 240 Ga. 776, 242 S.E.2d 720 (1978).

Section only limits confinement pending extradition. - Ga. L. 1951, p. 726, §§ 15-17 (see O.C.G.A. §§ 17-13-35 17-13-37) only limit the time during which one arrested as a fugitive may be kept in jail or on bail in lieu thereof, pending the completion of extradition proceedings and the issuance of the Governor’s arrest warrant. Stynchcombe v. Whitley, 240 Ga. 776, 242 S.E.2d 720 (1978). Cited in Bearden v. State, 223 Ga. 381, 155 S.E.2d 5 (1967); Ward v. Jarvis, 240 Ga. 668, 242 S.E.2d 134 (1978); Powell v. Brown, 281 Ga. 609, 641 S.E.2d 519 (2007).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 31A Am. Jur. 2d, Extradition, §§ 51, 57 et seq. C.J.S. - 35 C.J.S. (Rev), Extradition and Detainers, §§ 21, 22, 95.

U.L.A. - Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (U.L.A.) § 17.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2007–2007 · leading case: Powell v. Brown, 641 S.E.2d 519 (Ga. 2007).
Powell v. Brown, 641 S.E.2d 519 (Ga. 2007). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 17-13-37. The statutory process set out above contemplates a basic sequence in which a request is made to the governor, the governor approves the request and issues a warrant, and the accused is arrested on that warrant (or is arrested pursuant to OCGA § 17-13-34) and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.