Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Code 1933, § 27-3013, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 1382, § 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 17; Ga. L. 1985, p. 231, § 1; Ga. L. 2005, p. 88, § 5/HB 172.)
- Ga. L. 2005, p. 88, § 1/HB 172, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act shall be known and may be cited as the 'Crime Victims Restitution Act of 2005.'"
- Victim who is the subject of an order of restitution has a cause of action in the victim's own right for enforcement of the order. Therefore, an order of restitution is a debt within the ambit of 11 U.S.C. § 1328. Newton v. Fred Haley Poultry Farm, 15 Bankr. 708 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1981).
Before O.C.G.A. § 17-14-13 becomes operative, there must be a restitution order which is a condition of any relief ordered and the relief must have been accepted by the offender or inmate. Conklin v. Zant, 202 Ga. App. 214, 413 S.E.2d 536 (1991).
Cited in Cargill v. Zant, 207 Ga. App. 393, 427 S.E.2d 809 (1993); Patterson v. State, 289 Ga. App. 663, 658 S.E.2d 210 (2008); Patterson v. State, 289 Ga. App. 663, 658 S.E.2d 210 (2008).
- Valid orders of the court are enforceable under the general contempt authority, but restitution orders may only be entered upon a criminal conviction. 1987 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U87-8.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1992-02-13
Citation: 413 S.E.2d 439, 261 Ga. 859, 42 Fulton County D. Rep. 21, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 156
Snippet: Ct. 2064, 2070, 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1983); OCGA §§ 17-14-13(c), 17-10-1(a). Thus, as the dissenting judges