O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 17-4-42 (2019)

Issuance of special warrants for arrest; treatment of special warrants as general arrest warrants

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No judicial officer except a judge of the superior court shall issue a special warrant for arrest returnable only before himself; nor shall any superior court judge issue such warrant outside of his own judicial circuit. If issued outside the judicial circuit, the warrant shall be treated as a general arrest warrant.

History

Orig. Code 1863, § 4598; Code 1868, § 4620; Code 1873, § 4717; Code 1882, § 4717; Penal Code 1895,

§ 886; Penal Code 1910, § 907; Code 1933, § 27-106.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Justice of the peace cannot issue a special warrant. Ormond v. Ball, 120 Ga. 916, 48 S.E. 383 (1904).

Cited in Rhodes v. Pearce, 189 Ga. 623, 7 S.E.2d 251 (1940).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Justice of peace cannot order commitment hearing when arresting officer sets bond. - Since a justice of the peace cannot issue a special warrant for arrest returnable only to the justice, it

follows that the justice cannot order a commitment hearing when the arresting officer has purported to personally set the bond. 1970 Op. Att’y Gen. No. U70-152.

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 5 Am. Jur. 2d, Arrest, §§ 8 et seq., 10 et seq., 20 et seq., 23 et seq.

C.J.S. - 22 C.J.S., Criminal Procedure and Rights of the Accused, § 185 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Robinson v. Durden (M.D. Ga. 2025).
Robinson v. Durden (M.D. Ga. 2025). · cites it 4× “ECF 26 at 11 (citing O.C.G.A. § 17-4-42).5 The Court agrees that Durden has not established he was acting within his discretionary authority.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.