O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 17-6-5 (2019)

Acceptance of cash bonds for certain offenses; authorization

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any sheriff, deputy sheriff, county peace officer, or other county officer charged with the duty of enforcing the laws of this state relating to:

(1) Traffic or the operation or licensing of motor vehicles or operators;

(2) The width, height, or length of vehicles and loads;

(3) Motor common carriers and motor contract carriers;

(4) Commercial vehicle or driver safety;

(5) Hazardous materials transportation;

(6) Motor carrier insurance or registration;

(7) Road taxes on motor carriers as provided in Article 2 of Chapter 9 of Title 48;

(8) Game and fish;

(9) Boating; or

(10) Litter control who makes an arrest outside the corporate limits of any municipality of this state for a violation of said laws and who is authorized, as provided herein by a court of record having jurisdiction over such offenses, to accept cash bonds may accept a cash bond from the person arrested in lieu of a statutory bond or recognizance. No such officer shall accept a cash bond unless he or she is authorized to receive cash bonds in such cases by an order of the court having jurisdiction over such offenses and unless such order has been entered on the minutes of the court. Any such order may be granted, revoked, or modified by the court at any time.

History

Ga. L. 1953, Jan.-Feb. Sess., p. 331, § 1; Ga. L. 1962, p. 530, § 1; Ga. L. 1975, p. 845, § 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 1136, §§ 1, 4; Ga. L. 2011, p. 479, § 2/HB 112.

Annotations

Cross references. - Acceptance of

cash bonds from persons cited for traffic offenses under jurisdiction of traffic violations bureau of court, § 40-13-55 et seq.

Law reviews. - For comment on Land v. State, 103 Ga. App. 496, 119 S.E.2d 809 (1961), see 14 Mercer L. Rev. 452 (1963).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cash bond authorized for drunk driving arrestee. - If a person was arrested by a state patrol officer inside a municipality for driving under the influence, a deputy sheriff, even without authorization from the court, could accept a cash bond; the trial court, as a result, had

the authority to order the cash bond forfeited. Wilson v. State, 167 Ga. App. 421, 306 S.E.2d 704 (1983). Cited in Land v. State, 103 Ga. App. 496, 119 S.E.2d 809 (1961); Perry v. State, 118 Ga. App. 22, 162 S.E.2d 466 (1968).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Construction with O.C.G.A. § 17-6-2 as to misdemeanors generally. - While it was true that Ga. L. 1953, Jan.-Feb. Sess., p. 331, § 1 (see O.C.G.A. § 17-6-5) authorized the taking of cash

bonds under certain circumstances, it was quite obvious that this provision was in addition to and not in place of former Code 1933, § 27-902 (see O.C.G.A. § 17-6-2). 1957 Op. Att’y Gen. p. 65.

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Propriety of applying cash bail to payment of fine, 42 A.L.R.5th 547.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1983–2004 · leading case: Wilson v. State, 306 S.E.2d 704 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).
Wilson v. State, 306 S.E.2d 704 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 4× “The state argues that the deputy sheriff had no authorization from the court to accept cash bonds, as required by OCGA § 17-6-5 (Code Ann. § 27-508) and, thus, the trial court had no authority to order appellant’s cash bond forfeited.”
Jeter v. State, 603 S.E.2d 783 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “gives a cash bond for his appearance as provided in Code Section 17-6-5 and fails to appear on the date, time, and place specified in the citation or summons without legal excuse, the court may order said cash bond forfeited without *267 the necessity of complying with the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.