O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 17-6-51 (2019)

Suggesting employment of attorneys during negotiations regarding signing of bond or any time subsequent thereto

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Professional bondsmen, their agents, or representatives shall not suggest or advise the employment of or name for employment any attorney or attorneys to represent a defendant, during the negotiations for the bondsmen to sign the bond or subsequent thereto.

History

Ga. L. 1921, p. 243, § 2; Code 1933, § 27-503.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Jackson v. State, 140 Ga. App. 288, 231 S.E.2d 805 (1976); State v. Jack-

son, 188 Ga. App. 259, 372 S.E.2d 823 (1988).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 8A Am. Jur. 2d, Bail and Recognizance, § 8. C.J.S. - 8 C.J.S., Bail; Release and Detention Pending Proceedings, §§ 2 et seq., 170.

ALR. - Validity, construction, and application of statutes regulating bail bond business, 13 A.L.R.3d 618.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1988–1988 · leading case: State v. Jackson, 372 S.E.2d 823 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988).
State v. Jackson, 372 S.E.2d 823 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “The appellee, a bail bondsman, was charged by accusation with (1) suggesting to an arrestee the employment of a particular attorney, in violation of OCGA § 17-6-51; (2) soliciting business at the jail, in violation of OCGA § 17-6-52; and (3) giving advice to an arrestee with…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.