O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 18-2-20 (2019)

Rights of creditors to be favored by courts

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The rights of creditors shall be favored by the courts; and every remedy and facility shall be afforded them to detect, defeat, and annul any effort to defraud them of their just rights.

History

Orig. Code 1863, § 1947; Code 1868, § 1935; Code 1873, § 1945; Code 1882,

§ 1945; Civil Code 1895, § 2687; Civil Code 1910, § 3216; Code 1933, § 28-102.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS ANALYSIS GENERAL CONSIDERATION ACTIONS General Consideration Rights to set aside fraudulent transfers. - Former Code 1933, §§ 28101, 28-102, 28-201 and 28-202 (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 18-2-1, 18-2-20 and 18-2-70) provided the creditors with the right to set aside fraudulent transfers, and this rem-

edy was available to any creditor at the time of transfer who thereafter reduced the creditor’s claim to a judgment lien. United States v. Hickox, 356 F.2d 969, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7056 (5th Cir. 1966). Intervention by former partner was authorized by former Code 1933 §§ 28-

102 and 28-103 (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 182-20 and § 18-2-3, respectively) to wind up affairs since the partner’s allegations were sufficient. Sheppard v. Bridges, 137 Ga. 615, 74 S.E. 245, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 108 (1912). Interlocutory appointment of receiver under creditor’s bill attacking voluntary assignment for fraud was not error. Oliver & Co. v. Victor & Co., 74 Ga. 543, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 356 (1885). Debtors cannot shift assets at will, giving creditors mere notice. - If not a violation of the letter of former Civil Code 1910, §§ 3216 and 3217 (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 18-2-20 and § 18-2-3, respectively) it would certainly not accord with their spirit and purpose to hold that a firm of debtors could shift their assets at will, and impose on their creditors duties by mere notice, but could prevent a creditor from accepting for the creditor’s benefit the status which they had thrust upon the creditor for their own. Sheppard v. Bridges, 137 Ga. 615, 74 S.E. 245, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 108 (1912). One to whom alimony is due is creditor. - Willful failure to provide for the maintenance and support of spouse and children creates a lawful demand which, when legally enforced, is called

alimony, and is a debtor/creditor relation. Carter v. Bush, 216 Ga. 429, 116 S.E.2d 568, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 494 (1960). Damages available. - Georgia law allowing the recovery of general and punitive damages for fraudulent conveyances survived the enactment of Georgia’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act, O.C.G.A. § 18-2-70 et seq. Interfinancial Midtown, Inc. v. Choate Constr. Co., 343 Ga. App. 793, 806 S.E.2d 255, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 479 (2017). Actions It is essential that creditors’ pleadings set forth facts entitling each to maintain an action. Fouche v. Brower, 74 Ga. 251, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 302 (1885). Creditor bringing suit to prevent fraudulent conveyances acquires lien at commencement of suit. - Creditor, who brings suit to prevent the debtor from carrying into effect a threat to convey away all of the debtor’s property for purpose of defeating claims of such creditor, acquires a lien from commencement of the suit to prevent such fraudulent conveyance, and after service of process. Law v. Coleman, 173 Ga. 68, 159 S.E. 679, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 265 (1931).

RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. 37 C.J.S., Fraudulent Conveyances, §§ 1, 150 et seq. ALR. Larceny or embezzlement as affected by purpose to take or retain property in payment of, or as security for, a claim, 13 A.L.R. 142; 116 A.L.R. 997. Availability of judgment under which exempt property has been seized as a set-off or counterclaim against claim based on the wrongful seizure, 20 A.L.R. 276. Attachment or execution creditor as purchaser within rule that first of two purchasers to obtain possession will prevail, 21 A.L.R. 1031. Right of creditor to interest after bankruptcy, declared insolvency, or appoint-

ment of receiver, where assets are more than sufficient to pay the principal of all claims, 39 A.L.R. 457; 44 A.L.R. 1170. Property covered by power of appointment as subject to claims of donee’s creditors, 121 A.L.R. 803. Right of creditors in respect of property gratuitously conveyed or transferred to a third person for alleged benefit of debtor, 147 A.L.R. 1160. Purchase of annuity by debtor as fraud on creditors, 154 A.L.R. 727. Construction and effect of provision in note for “renewal until paid,” and the like, 35 A.L.R.2d 1090. Conveyance or transfer in consideration of legal services, rendered or to be rendered, as fraudulent as against creditors, 45 A.L.R.2d 500.

Exemption of proceeds of national service life insurance from claims of creditors, 54 A.L.R.2d 1335. Right of creditor to set up statute of limitations against other creditors of his debtor, 71 A.L.R.2d 1049. Unsolicited mailing, distribution, house

call, or telephone call as invasion of privacy, 56 A.L.R.3d 457. Purchase of annuity by debtor as fraud on creditors, 74 A.L.R.6th 549. Creditor’s right to have bankruptcy discharge of individual debtor revoked, vacated, and set aside, 138 A.L.R. Fed 253.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1994–2017 · leading case: Interfinancial Midtown, Inc. v. Choate Constr. Co., 806 S.E.2d 255 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).
Interfinancial Midtown, Inc. v. Choate Constr. Co., 806 S.E.2d 255 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 8× “9 Under these provisions, "[t]he rights of creditors shall be favored by the courts; and every remedy and facility shall be afforded them to detect, defeat, and annul any effort to defraud them of their just rights [;]" 10 and "[c]reditors may attack as fraudulent a judgment,…”
Gwinnett Prop., N v. v. G+H Montage GmbH, 453 S.E.2d 52 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 4× “Moreover, in OCGA § 18-2-20, the General Assembly has provided that "[t]he rights of creditors shall be favored by the courts; and every remedy and facility shall be afforded them to detect, defeat, and annul any effort to defraud them of their just rights.”
Chepstow Ltd. v. Marshall B. Hunt, 381 F.3d 1077 (11th Cir. 2004). “” Ga. Code Ann. § 18-2-20 . However, § 18-2-22 makes no mention of parties other than debtors and “taking parties” (transferees) being liable, and there is no Georgia decision that construes it to provide a claim against aiders and abettors who do not themselves receive the…”
Coleman v. J & B Enter., Inc. (In Re Vets. Choice Mortg.), 291 B.R. 894 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2003). · cites it 2× “See O.C.G.A. § 18-2-20, O.C.G.A. § 18-2-21, O.”
Interfinancial Midtown, Inc. v. Choate Constr. Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 7× “And while it outlined some specific remedies for the first time in OCGA §§ 18-2-77 and 18-2-78 that a creditor “may 14 obtain,” it did not repeal OCGA § 18-2-20 and § 18-2-21.9 Under these provisions, “[t]he rights of creditors shall be favored by the courts; and every remedy…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.