O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 18-2-49 (2019)

Correcting of mistake in list of assets or creditors

✓ O.C.G.A.: 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Where an unintentional mistake or omission has been made in the description of the property, in the list of assets, in the method of preparing the list of assets, or in the list of creditors, the same may be amended upon proof thereof to the court.

History

Ga. L. 1894, p. 90, § 18; Civil Code

1895, § 2715; Civil Code 1910, § 3248; Code 1933, § 28-319.

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. 21 C.J.S., Creditor and Debtor, § 5 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Asset Recovery Assocs., LLC v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Asset Recovery Assocs., LLC v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2022). · cites it 25× “This time, Whole Foods invokes O.C.G.A. §§ 18-2-49 and 18-2-47 to argue that the Deed of Assignment is missing a complete list of assets and an assignee affidavit, respectively.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.