O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 18-2-49 (2019)
Correcting of mistake in list of assets or creditors
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Where an unintentional mistake or omission has been made in the description of the property, in the list of assets, in the method of preparing the list of assets, or in the list of creditors, the same may be amended upon proof thereof to the court.
History
Ga. L. 1894, p. 90, § 18; Civil Code
1895, § 2715; Civil Code 1910, § 3248; Code 1933, § 28-319.
Annotations
RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. 21 C.J.S., Creditor and Debtor, § 5 et seq.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Asset Recovery Assocs., LLC v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2022).
Asset Recovery Assocs., LLC v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2022). “This time, Whole Foods invokes O.C.G.A. §§ 18-2-49 and 18-2-47 to argue that the Deed of Assignment is missing a complete list of assets and an assignee affidavit, respectively.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.