Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §18-4-42, enacted by Ga. L. 2016, p. 8, § 1/SB 255.)
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions decided under former O.C.G.A. §§ 18-4-113 and18-4-117 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Garnishee can admit an indebtedness but contend and show by denial that the indebtedness admitted is exempt from the process of garnishment, and because of the garnishee's denial, the garnishee can fail to pay the amount into court without subjecting itself to the penalty of being subject to judgment for the entire indebtedness. United Merchants & Mfrs., Inc. v. Citizens & S. Nat'l Bank, 166 Ga. App. 468, 304 S.E.2d 552 (1983) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 18-4-113).
- Because a default judgment can be entered pursuant to former O.C.G.A. § 18-4-115(a) only when the garnishee failed to timely file an answer, and by the plain terms of former O.C.G.A. § 18-4-113(a)(1), the time in which an answer must be filed was triggered by the service of a summons of continuing garnishment, a default judgment was entered as provided in § 18-4-115(a) only after the garnishee had been served with proper process or had waived service of process, and § 18-4-115(b) provides relief, therefore, only when process had been served or waived; when a court enters a default judgment in a continuing garnishment proceeding in which the garnishee had not been served with a summons of continuing garnishment and the court had not obtained jurisdiction of the person of the garnishee, the default judgment was not one entered as provided in § 18-4-115(a), and § 18-4-115(b) afforded no relief, and in such a case, the garnishee was entitled to bring a motion to set aside the default judgment under O.C.G.A. § 9-11-60(d)(1). Lewis v. Capital Bank, 311 Ga. App. 795, 717 S.E.2d 481 (2011) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 18-4-113).
Former O.C.G.A. § 18-4-117 was not intended to obviate a nonemployer- garnishee's compliance with former O.C.G.A. § 18-4-113. Melnick v. Fund Mgt., Inc., 172 Ga. App. 773, 324 S.E.2d 595 (1984) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 18-4-113).
- Purpose of former O.C.G.A. § 18-4-117 was to ensure that only employers will be subject to continuing garnishment and that nonemployer garnishees will be automatically discharged with regard to the continuing aspect of the action; however, that section did not purport to discharge a nonemployer garnishee from such general garnishment liability as existed at the time the original answer was filed. Melnick v. Fund Mgt., Inc., 172 Ga. App. 773, 324 S.E.2d 595 (1984) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 18-4-117).
- 6 Am. Jur. 2d, Attachment and Garnishment, § 339 et seq.
- 38 C.J.S., Garnishment, § 173 et seq.
No results found for Georgia Code 18-4-42.