Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §19-11-135, enacted by Ga. L. 1997, p. 1613, § 33; Ga. L. 2013, p. 705, § 1/SB 193.)
- Pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 19-11-135(f) and given that two closely interrelated contempt proceedings between a former husband and a former wife were consolidated for hearing, the trial court did not abuse the court's discretion in permitting one of the former spouses to testify by telephone or by not dismissing the spouse's contempt motion for want of prosecution. Baars v. Freeman, 288 Ga. 835, 708 S.E.2d 273 (2011).
- In a grandparent visitation matter, the trial court did not abuse the court's discretion in connection with the court's denial of the grandmother's request to appear by telephone, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 19-9-50(b), because the trial court properly determined that the grandmother was not indigent based on the information provided that the grandmother's monthly income was $4,669. Devlin v. Devlin, 339 Ga. App. 520, 791 S.E.2d 840 (2016).
Warning: 'results' key not found in API response
No results found for Georgia Code 19-11-135.