✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Duties of support applicable under this article are those imposed or imposable under the laws of any state in which the obligor was present during the period for which support is sought. The obligor is presumed to have been present in the responding state during the period for which support is sought until otherwise shown.
History
Ga. L. 1958, p. 34, § 6.
Annotations
RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 23 Am. Jur. 2d, Desertion and Nonsupport, § 74. C.J.S. 41 C.J.S., Husband and Wife, § 2. 67A C.J.S., Parent and Child, § 156 et seq. U.L.A. Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (1958 Act) (U.L.A.) § 7.
ALR. Conflict of laws as to right of child or third person against parent for support of child, 34 A.L.R.2d 1460.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1986–1999 · leading case: Evans v. State, 341 S.E.2d 865 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986).
Evans v. State, 341 S.E.2d 865 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4ד" OCGA § 19-11-49. "All duties of support .”
Dep't of Human Resources v. Deason, 520 S.E.2d 712 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2דThus, this action was not a domestication of a foreign child support judgment but, instead, was a registration of such judgment under URESA.”
In re Pollock, 90 B.R. 747 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1988). “The obligator is presumed to have been present in the responding state during the period for which support is sought until otherwise shown.”
Dep't of Human Resources v. Pruitt, 476 S.E.2d 764 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2דOCGA § 19-11-49. In the absence of other evidence, the obligor is presumed to have been present in the responding state during the period for which support is sought.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.