Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1973, p. 192, § 17; Ga. L. 1976, p. 1537, § 15; Ga. L. 1985, p. 785, § 5; Ga. L. 1987, p. 186, § 3.)
- In a child support recovery action against the purported father under the Child Support Recovery Act (O.C.G.A. § 19-11-1 et seq.), the superior court could not rule on the father's request that the child be legitimated, or given his last name, or that he be given permanent and definite visitation rights. Department of Human Resources v. Brown, 213 Ga. App. 42, 443 S.E.2d 685 (1994).
- In a contempt proceeding brought by the Georgia Department of Human Resources, the trial court erred in modifying a parent's child support obligation and in forgiving a portion of the arrearage because the court lacked authority to modify support orders in contempt proceedings, and O.C.G.A. § 19-6-17(e)(1)(3) precluded retroactive modification of child support. Ga. Dep't of Human Res. v. Gamble, 297 Ga. App. 509, 677 S.E.2d 713 (2009).
Cited in Burns v. Swinney, 168 Ga. App. 902, 310 S.E.2d 733 (1983); Pirkle v. Department of Human Resources, 178 Ga. App. 719, 344 S.E.2d 520 (1986); Neal v. State, 182 Ga. App. 37, 354 S.E.2d 664 (1987).
- Right to credit on child support payments for social security or other government dependency payments made for benefit of child, 34 A.L.R.5th 447.
No results found for Georgia Code 19-11-7.