Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 19-9-23 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 19 DOMESTIC RELATIONS

Section 9. Child Custody Proceedings, 19-9-1 through 19-9-134.

ARTICLE 2 CHILD CUSTODY INTRASTATE JURISDICTION ACT

19-9-23. Actions to obtain change of legal custody; how and where brought; use of certain complaints prohibited.

  1. Except as otherwise provided in this Code section, after a court has determined who is to be the legal custodian of a child, any complaint seeking to obtain a change of legal custody of the child shall be brought as a separate action in the county of residence of the legal custodian of the child.
  2. A complaint by the legal custodian seeking a change of legal custody or visitation rights shall be brought as a separate action in compliance with Article VI, Section II, Paragraph VI of the Constitution of this state.
  3. No complaint specified in subsection (a) or (b) of this Code section shall be made:
    1. As a counterclaim or in any other manner in response to a petition for a writ of habeas corpus seeking to enforce a child custody order; or
    2. In response to any other action or motion seeking to enforce a child custody order.
  4. The use of a complaint in the nature of habeas corpus seeking a change of child custody is prohibited.

(Ga. L. 1978, p. 1957, § 4; Ga. L. 1983, p. 3, § 52.)

Cross references.

- Power of court in proceeding on writ of habeas corpus sought on account of detention of spouse or child, § 9-14-2.

Code Commission notes.

- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1985, "maner" was changed to "manner" in paragraph (c)(1).

Law reviews.

- For article surveying developments in Georgia domestic relations law from mid-1980 through mid-1981, see 33 Mercer L. Rev. 109 (1981). For annual survey of domestic relations cases, see 57 Mercer L. Rev. 173 (2005). For annual survey on domestic relations, see 65 Mercer L. Rev. 107 (2013).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Plain meaning of O.C.G.A. § 19-9-23(a) is that an action by the noncustodial parent to modify visitation with a minor child must be brought in the county of residence of the custodial parent. Bennett v. Wood, 188 Ga. App. 630, 373 S.E.2d 645 (1988); Rogers v. Baudet, 215 Ga. App. 214, 449 S.E.2d 900 (1994).

Custody can only be relitigated where legal custodian resides.

- Georgia courts will refuse to provide forum for relitigating custody except where legal custodian resides. Yearta v. Scroggins, 245 Ga. 831, 268 S.E.2d 151 (1980).

As a matter of public policy, Georgia courts refuse to provide forum in Georgia for relitigating custody when noncustodial parent resident in Georgia has improperly removed child from physical custody of custodial parent who resides in another state. Etzion v. Evans, 247 Ga. 390, 276 S.E.2d 577 (1981).

Trial court erred by granting a parent's complaint for modification of child custody and support and changing custody, which was filed in that parent's county of residence, as that county was not the jurisdiction wherein the issue of custody and support was originally litigated and the opposing parent never waived the challenge to the jurisdiction of the trial court via a pro se letter, which merely acknowledged receipt of the complaint; as a result, the judgment granting the change of custody was reversed and the case was remanded to the trial court with directions for the trial court to transfer the case to the trial court of the proper county. Hatch v. Hatch, 287 Ga. App. 832, 652 S.E.2d 874 (2007).

Jurisdiction when county services department is legal custodian.

- When the legal custodian of a child is a county Department of Family and Children Services, any action seeking a change in custody is to be brought in that county. Any other county, including the county of residence of the child, is without jurisdiction to grant any relief involving custody including a writ of habeas corpus. DeKalb County Dep't of Family & Children Servs. v. Queen, 252 Ga. 274, 312 S.E.2d 800 (1984).

Juvenile court did not retain jurisdiction.

- Although a great aunt and great step-uncle argued that the trial court erred in exercising subject matter jurisdiction in a custody matter at a time when the juvenile court had exclusive original jurisdiction, there was no order of the superior court transferring the petition to the juvenile court, and the jurisdiction obtained during an original deprivation proceeding did not serve to retain such jurisdiction; therefore, the juvenile court did not retain jurisdiction. The complaint for permanent custody filed by the grandmother and the step-grandfather was not in the nature of a deprivation petition. Wiepert v. Stover, 298 Ga. App. 683, 680 S.E.2d 707 (2009), overruled on other grounds, Artson, LLC v. Hudson, 322 Ga. App. 859, 747 S.E.2d 68 (2013) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 15-11-28).

Jurisdiction to consider custody modification petition and contempt motion together.

- In the absence of evidence that the husband objected to the trial court's decision to consider the contempt motion together with the custody petition, his consent was inferred. Further, because the custody petition was filed as a separate action in the husband's county, the requirements and purpose of O.C.G.A. § 19-9-23 were satisfied. Saravia v. Mendoza, 303 Ga. App. 758, 695 S.E.2d 47 (2010).

Binding findings on parties when proceeding in another county.

- When a mother filed a motion for change of custody in the father's home county (Fulton), and the Fulton court ruled there was a material change in circumstances, and the father then filed a motion for change of custody in the mother's county (DeKalb), the Fulton ruling had a preclusive effect on the material change of circumstances issue under the doctrine of collateral estoppel. However, the mother could present evidence of facts arising after that judgment. Allen v. McGuire, 339 Ga. App. 219, 793 S.E.2d 151 (2016).

Jurisdiction for modification of divorce decree.

- Georgia Court of Appeals finds it necessary in the context of divorce and alimony cases to depart from the general rule that a contempt action must be brought in the offended court, thus, it now holds that when a superior court other than the superior court rendering the original divorce decree acquires jurisdiction and venue to modify that decree, it likewise possesses the jurisdiction and venue to entertain a counterclaim alleging the plaintiff is in contempt of the original decree. Colbert v. Colbert, 321 Ga. App. 841, 743 S.E.2d 505 (2013).

Trial court properly acquired jurisdiction to modify a divorce decree, independent of the contemporaneous motion for contempt, because the mother, a nonresident, voluntarily instituted the suit in the jurisdiction of the trial court; therefore, the mother submitted to the court's jurisdiction for all purposes. Colbert v. Colbert, 321 Ga. App. 841, 743 S.E.2d 505 (2013).

Litigation of custody when temporary guardian appointed.

- Boyfriend, who had been appointed temporary guardian of the child, was not the child's "legal custodian" as that term was used in the Georgia Child Custody Intrastate Jurisdiction Act, O.C.G.A. § 19-9-20 et seq., and, thus, the provisions of the Act, including the Act's venue provisions, did not apply; accordingly, the trial court erred in dismissing the grandmother's petition for custody of the child on the ground that venue was not proper in the county where the mother was incarcerated but would have been proper where the temporary guardian, the boyfriend, resided, as application of the general venue rules governing venue in civil cases, contained in the Georgia Constitution, showed that since the mother was a necessary party to the grandmother's custody action, filing the action in the county where the mother was incarcerated was proper. Gordon v. Gordon, 269 Ga. App. 224, 603 S.E.2d 732 (2004).

Waiver of challenge to venue.

- In an action to establish paternity, the mother waived any challenge to venue when she consented to an adjudication of custody in her complaint and made no objection to venue in the trial court until she apparently raised it during closing argument. Ganny v. Ganny, 238 Ga. App. 123, 518 S.E.2d 148 (1999).

Father waived defense to lack of venue in mother's counterclaim for modification of child support by failing to file a motion to dismiss in a timely and expeditious manner. Houston v. Brown, 212 Ga. App. 834, 443 S.E.2d 3 (1994).

Venue shown.

- Mother's petition for modification of custody was properly filed in and decided by the Superior Court of Cherokee County because there was evidence that supported the superior court's determination that the father was a resident of Cherokee County when the mother filed her modification petition; the father was served at his Cherokee County apartment, and the superior court orally ruled that while the father had the intent to return to another county, the father was a resident of Cherokee County until the father's physical presence changed. Viskup v. Viskup, 291 Ga. 103, 727 S.E.2d 97 (2012).

Motion filed in proper county.

- Motion for a change in custody was not filed in the wrong county as the wife originally lived in the county in which the action was initiated, the wife moved to another county while the case was pending, and the wife waived any personal jurisdiction and venue defenses by entering into a consent order regarding custody and waiting many months before asserting the defense. Andersen v. Farrington, 291 Ga. 775, 731 S.E.2d 351 (2012).

Habeas corpus.

- O.C.G.A. § 19-9-23(d) governs the situation where a party is seeking to change legal custody from someone who has permanent custody by court order and is not applicable when the mother who has permanent custody seeks the return of her children from a person to whom she has given temporary custody. Alvarez v. Sills, 258 Ga. 18, 365 S.E.2d 107 (1988).

"Action or motion seeking to enforce child custody order."

- Complaint for modification of support is not an "action or motion seeking to enforce a child custody order" under O.C.G.A. § 19-9-23(c)(2). Dixon v. Dixon, 183 Ga. App. 756, 360 S.E.2d 8, cert. denied, 183 Ga. App. 905, 360 S.E.2d 8 (1987).

Counterclaim for change of custody.

- Trial court erred in entertaining a counterclaim for a change of custody in the county of legal residence of the noncustodial parent even though the custodial parent had brought her action for a change of visitation rights in the county of residence of the noncustodial parent. Jones v. Jones, 178 Ga. App. 794, 344 S.E.2d 677 (1986), aff'd, 256 Ga. 742, 352 S.E.2d 754 (1987).

When the custodial mother sued the father in his county of residence for modification of child support, the father, in filing a counterclaim seeking to change custody, violated two provisions of O.C.G.A. § 19-9-23(a): (1) by failing to bring a separate action to have custody changed; and (2) by failing to bring such an action in the county of residence of the legal custodian of the child. Wilson v. Baldwin, 239 Ga. App. 327, 519 S.E.2d 251 (1999); Roach v. Kapur, 240 Ga. App. 558, 524 S.E.2d 246 (1999), aff'd, 272 Ga. 767, 534 S.E.2d 420 (2000).

Custodial mother did not waive the mandatory provisions of subsections (a) and (c) of O.C.G.A. § 19-9-23 by the consent transfer of her suit for contempt, including her claim for a change in custody to the father's county of residence. Kapur v. Roach, 272 Ga. 767, 534 S.E.2d 420 (2000).

Trial court erred in granting a change of primary physical custody to a mother, based on the mother's modification of custody counterclaim, as the father's petition sought only a clarification as to the days that the father was to have custody under the parties' joint custody arrangement, as well as an order awarding the father child support, and accordingly, the mother could only obtain such relief by way of a separate action pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 19-9-23; the fact that the parties disagreed over whether the child should be educated at a public school or at a private school did not constitute a material change of circumstances that affected the child's welfare, and accordingly, there was no justification for a change of custody. Terry v. Garibaldi, 274 Ga. App. 405, 618 S.E.2d 6 (2005).

Under the plain language of O.C.G.A. § 19-9-23, the trial court erred in denying a motion to dismiss a parent's counterclaim seeking a change in physical custody and in finding that the evidence was sufficient to support the custody determination. Seeley v. Seeley, 282 Ga. App. 394, 638 S.E.2d 837 (2006).

Because a change of custody could not be asserted as a counterclaim, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 19-9-23, the trial court erred in denying a father's motion to dismiss the claim asserted by a mother, and the father's failure to raise the matter as a defense did not act as a waiver as he filed no response to the counterclaim; moreover, the fact that the court was mistaken in dismissing the mother's original Fulton County action did not excuse the mother from appealing that ruling nor did it authorize the mother to pursue the claim as a counterclaim, especially when the statute and case law were so definitive that such a counterclaim was simply not permitted. Bailey v. Bailey, 283 Ga. App. 361, 641 S.E.2d 580 (2007).

Custody award was affirmed because even if the father's decision to file a petition for change of custody was predicated on the mother's successful petition for habeas corpus, the father's petition was not a forbidden "response" to the mother's petition for purposes of O.C.G.A. § 19-9-23(c)(1). Alberti v. Alberti, 320 Ga. App. 724, 741 S.E.2d 179 (2013).

Counterclaim seeking a change of custody in an action brought by the custodial parent in the county of the noncustodial parent's residence is improper because it is not a separate action and it is not brought in the county of the custodial parent's residence. The Supreme Court of Georgia has explained that O.C.G.A. § 19-9-23 has been enacted by the Georgia legislature to curtail the practice of allowing the noncustodial parent to relitigate custody in the noncustodial parent's own jurisdiction. Colbert v. Colbert, 321 Ga. App. 841, 743 S.E.2d 505 (2013).

Seeking change of custody in counterclaim.

- Father's petition for change of custody in counterclaim to mother's petition to enforce custody was not proper. Pruitt v. Hooks, 163 Ga. App. 892, 296 S.E.2d 193 (1982).

Any action for a change of legal custody shall be brought as a separate action in the county of residence of the legal custodian of the child, and the trial court cannot entertain a counterclaim for a change of custody in the county of legal residence of the non-custodial parent. Bullington v. Bullington, 181 Ga. App. 256, 351 S.E.2d 700 (1986).

Complaint seeking a change of legal custody of a child may not be brought in response to any action or motion to enforce a child custody order so when a wife has filed a motion for contempt against her divorced husband for nonpayment of child support, that portion of the order granting the husband's counterclaim for a change in custody was reversed. Hammontree v. Hammontree, 186 Ga. App. 819, 368 S.E.2d 576 (1988).

Father did not seek to change custody by means of a counterclaim, contrary to the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 19-9-23(a) and (c), because the record showed that he filed a separate petition seeking modification of custody, which was not responsive to the mother's action to domesticate a foreign judgment, particularly as the actions, which were filed almost simultaneously, bore different case numbers. Lynch v. Horton, 302 Ga. App. 597, 692 S.E.2d 34 (2010), cert. denied, U.S. , 131 S. Ct. 2447, 179 L. Ed. 2d 1210 (2011).

Modification of custody rights in contempt proceeding not authorized.

- Trial court exceeded the court's authority by entering an order within the context of a contempt proceeding which had the effect of modifying custody. McCall v. McCall, 246 Ga. App. 770, 542 S.E.2d 168 (2000).

Trial court properly held a parent in contempt in a post-divorce matter as the parent acknowledged that the parent refused to return the parties' children to the custodial parent after summer visitation and helped the children obtain legal counsel to file a modification of custody proceeding which was prohibited by prior trial court orders. Further, the custodial parent properly filed the contempt petition in the county wherein that parent resided. Because the custodial parent was successful in having the other parent found in contempt, the custodial parent was properly awarded attorney fees. Brochin v. Brochin, 294 Ga. App. 406, 669 S.E.2d 203 (2008).

When the father violated the joint custody agreement incorporated in the divorce decree by taking the child to Maryland and refusing to return the child to Georgia, the trial court entered an ex parte emergency order in the contempt action. Because the trial court issued a final order modifying custody in a separate action as required by O.C.G.A. § 19-9-23, the final order rendered any issues regarding the validity of the temporary order moot. Roberts v. Kinsey, 308 Ga. App. 675, 708 S.E.2d 600 (2011).

There was valid waiver of jurisdiction when the legal custodian of the minor children moved from one county to another before the court entered the court's first order regarding custody, although the noncustodial parent, who was the subject of the custodian's contempt proceeding, petitioned in the custodian's case to modify custody; the matters which could have properly been considered by the trial court were not even raised by the custodial parent until more than six months after she had consented in two orders modifying custody and after the trial court had found that emergency action was required in order to protect the best interests of the minor children of the parties. Daust v. Daust, 204 Ga. App. 29, 418 S.E.2d 409 (1992).

Deprivation petition.

- Juvenile court did not retain jurisdiction to hear grandparents' petition for permanent custody after determining that the mother's four children were deprived since the grandparents' complaint for permanent custody was not in the nature of a deprivation petition and did not allege that they should be granted permanent custody of the children on the basis that the children were deprived. In re C.C., 193 Ga. App. 120, 387 S.E.2d 46 (1989).

Modification of visitation rights.

- Any conflict between the provisions of O.C.G.A. §§ 19-9-1(b) and19-9-3(b) with those of O.C.G.A. § 19-9-23, insofar as seeking modification of visitation rights by motion is concerned, is harmonized by holding that the former come into play only when jurisdiction and venue are also proper. Bennett v. Wood, 188 Ga. App. 630, 373 S.E.2d 645 (1988).

Inasmuch as the record shows that this divorce action terminated with the entry of a final judgment and decree; that the wife subsequently changed her residence to another county; and that the husband filed his motion to modify outside the term of court, the trial court erred in ruling on the husband's motion to modify visitation. Ward v. Ward, 194 Ga. App. 669, 391 S.E.2d 480 (1990).

Although a trial court may modify, sua sponte, visitation under certain circumstances pursuant to O.C.G.A. §§ 19-9-1(b) and19-9-3(b), those provisions "come into play only when jurisdiction and venue are also proper." Rogers v. Baudet, 215 Ga. App. 214, 449 S.E.2d 900 (1994).

Action not separate or in proper county.

- Mother's oral motion for change in custody failed to meet the requirements of O.C.G.A. § 19-9-23 in two respects; the mother did not seek a change in custody in a separate action, but rather in response to the father's petition for contempt against the mother, and the mother did not seek a change in custody in the county in which the father lived as required by § 19-9-23(a) and (b). Hammonds v. Parks, 319 Ga. App. 792, 735 S.E.2d 801 (2012).

Appeal moot when visitation restored.

- In a post-divorce proceeding, the appellate court dismissed a father's appeal of the trial court's rulings with regard to the writ for habeas corpus filed seeking to enforce visitation rights because the appeal was moot since the father's visitation was restored. Higdon v. Higdon, 321 Ga. App. 260, 739 S.E.2d 498 (2013).

Cited in Munday v. Munday, 243 Ga. 863, 257 S.E.2d 282 (1979); Lanning v. Lanning, 151 Ga. App. 648, 260 S.E.2d 764 (1979); Munday v. Munday, 152 Ga. App. 232, 262 S.E.2d 543 (1979); Austin v. Austin, 245 Ga. 487, 265 S.E.2d 788 (1980); Seymour v. Seymour, 156 Ga. App. 293, 274 S.E.2d 690 (1980); Hutto v. Hutto, 250 Ga. 116, 296 S.E.2d 549 (1982); In re D.N.M., 193 Ga. App. 812, 389 S.E.2d 336 (1989); Kemp v. Sharp, 261 Ga. 600, 409 S.E.2d 204 (1991); Upchurch v. Smith, 281 Ga. 28, 635 S.E.2d 710 (2006); Taylor v. Curl, 298 Ga. App. 45, 679 S.E.2d 80 (2009); Oglesby v. Deal, 311 Ga. App. 622, 716 S.E.2d 749 (2011).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 2 Am. Jur. 2d, Adoption, §§ 107, 113.

C.J.S.

- 15A C.J.S., Conflict of Laws, § 52 et seq. 39 C.J.S., Habeas Corpus, §§ 6, 7, 124 et seq. 39 C.J.S., Guardian and Ward, § 58. 67A C.J.S., Parent and Child, § 128 et seq.

ALR.

- Award of custody of child where contest is between child's mother and grandparent, 29 A.L.R.3d 366.

Right to require psychiatric or mental examination for party seeking to obtain or retain custody of child, 99 A.L.R.3d 268.

Religion as factor in child custody and visitation cases, 22 A.L.R.4th 971.

Interference by custodian of child with noncustodial parent's visitation rights as ground for change of custody, 28 A.L.R.4th 9.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 19-9-23

Total Results: 14  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Viskup v. Viskup, 727 S.E.2d 97 (Ga. 2012).

Cited 73 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Apr 24, 2012 | 291 Ga. 103, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 1517

...dy case regarding which parent has custody, regardless of finality). 1. Father contends entry of the judgment was erroneous because the modification petition was not filed in and decided by a superior court of the statutorily-prescribed county. OCGA § 19-9-23(a) requires a child-custody modification action to be filed in the legal custodian's county of residence....
Copy

Stills v. Johnson, 533 S.E.2d 695 (Ga. 2000).

Cited 46 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jul 10, 2000 | 272 Ga. 645, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 3553

...[36] Majority opinion at 700-701. [37] Wrightson v. Wrightson, 266 Ga. 493, 496, 467 S.E.2d 578 (1996); Prater v. Wheeler, 253 Ga. 649, 322 S.E.2d 892 (1984). [38] See OCGA §§ 19-9-21 to 19-9-24. [39] 258 Ga. 18, 365 S.E.2d 107 (1988). [40] See OCGA §§ 19-9-23(a), (b); 19-9-22(2)....
Copy

Alvarez v. Sills, 365 S.E.2d 97 (Ga. 1988).

Cited 22 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 25, 1988 | 258 Ga. 18

...s that the question of custody would be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction where the children reside. The trial court held that because of the agreement the aunt had legal custody and that the mother's habeas petition was barred by OCGA § 19-9-23 (d) of the Georgia Child Custody Intrastate Jurisdiction Act of 1978. The Georgia Child Custody Intrastate Jurisdiction Act of 1978 and its prohibition against complaints in the nature of a habeas corpus seeking a change of custody, OCGA § 19-9-23 (d), cited by the trial court as precluding the mother's action, are inapplicable. That act governs the procedure to be followed by a party seeking a change in "legal custody," OCGA § 19-9-23 (a) and (b) (emphasis supplied), and defines "legal custodian" as "a person who has been awarded permanent custody of a child by a court order....
...) if the appellant, after two years, could not properly care for the children, or (2) until any disagreement by the parties about the appellant's ability to provide such care was resolved by a court upon proper petition. The majority holds that OCGA § 19-9-23 (d) is inapplicable in this case because the appellee is not the legal custodian as required in OCGA § 19-9-23 (a)....
...This statutory definition of "legal custodian" does not consider a "legal custodian" created by a contract as allowed by OCGA § 19-7-1 (b) (1). Regardless, this term's meaning is only important when a question arises about where the custody action "shall be brought" which is not an issue in this case. OCGA § 19-9-23 (a)....
Copy

Jones v. Jones, 352 S.E.2d 754 (Ga. 1987).

Cited 21 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 13, 1987 | 256 Ga. 742

...794 (344 SE2d 677) (1986). The question presented in this case is whether a noncustodial parent may counterclaim for change of custody in an action brought by the custodial parent, in the court of the noncustodial parent's residence, to modify visitation rights. OCGA § 19-9-23, the controlling statute, provides, in pertinent part: "(a) Except as otherwise provided in this Code section, after a court has determined who is to be the legal custodian of a child, any complaint seeking to obtain a change of legal cust...
...ld custody order." *743 The custodial parent, in this case the mother, sought to have the father's visitation rights modified and brought a separate action in the county of residence of the father, the noncustodial parent. This was proper under OCGA § 19-9-23 (a). The father, in filing a counterclaim seeking to change custody, violated two provisions of OCGA § 19-9-23 (a): (1) by failing to bring a separate action to have custody changed, and (2) by failing to bring such an action in the county of residence of the legal custodian of the child....
...motion that the counterclaim be dismissed. The cases cited by the dissent, Buckholts v. Buckholts, 251 Ga. 58 (302 SE2d 676) (1983), and Ledford v. Bowers, 248 Ga. 804 (286 SE2d 293) (1982), are inapposite. Neither case involved a violation of OCGA § 19-9-23; in neither case was a change of custody action brought as a counterclaim; in neither case was a change of custody action brought in improper forum....
...ounty, which was the county of the legal custodian, and we held that he could be subjected in that county to a counterclaim for modification of child support. In this case, a counterclaim for change of custody was brought in direct violation of OCGA § 19-9-23....
Copy

Dallow v. Dallow, 299 Ga. 762 (Ga. 2016).

Cited 20 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Sep 12, 2016 | 791 S.E.2d 20

...igants to engage in many intricate jurisdictional analyses of this sort will soon begin to dissipate). We can now turn to Father’s enumerations. 17 3. Father contends first that OCGA §§ 19-9-23 and 19-9-24 required the trial court to dismiss Mother’s October 2014 complaint for modification of his visitation rights....
...the pleadings.’” (citation omitted)). 18 374-375 (245 SE2d 648) (1978) (plurality opinion). The CCIJA is codified at OCGA §§ 19-9-20 to 19-9-24.4 (b) We first consider OCGA § 19-9-23.5 Subsection (a) requires that any complaint seeking to change which parent has the majority of parenting time must be brought as a separate action in that primary physical custodian’s county of residence.6 Subsection (b) requires tha...
...4 In 2001, the General Assembly replaced the UCCJA with Georgia’s version of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act or UCCJEA, Ga. L. 2001, p. 129 (codified at OCGA §§ 19-9-40 to 19-9-104). 5 OCGA § 19-9-23 says in full: (a) Except as otherwise provided in this Code section, after a court has determined who is to be the legal custodian of a child, any complaint seeking to obtain a change of legal c...
...procedures for habeas corpus, see OCGA §§ 9-14-1 to 9-14-23, or by invoking provisions of the Civil Practice Act that allow or require aggregation of claims involving the same parties or general subject matter, see, e.g., OCGA § 9-11-13 (counterclaims). Father relies on § 19-9-23 (c) (2), which prohibits a complaint seeking to obtain a change of visitation rights from being made “[i]n response to any [non- habeas corpus] action or motion seeking to enforce a child custody order.” Pointing to the contempt pet...
..., which she filed two months later, was impermissibly made “[i]n response to” his contempt action. Mother’s modification complaint may have been prompted, at least in part, by Father’s filing of his contempt petition against her, but OCGA § 19-9-23 is not 20 concerned with the motivations behind the proceedings it addresses. Rather, the statute regulates how and where complaints to change custody (and visitation) may be pursued, and Mother did not file her modification action as a responsive pleading or counterclaim in Father’s divorce contempt action. Instead, she did exactly what § 19-9-23 (b) required her to do to obtain modification of Father’s visitation rights: she filed a “complaint ....
...742, 743 (352 SE2d 754) (1987) (“The custodial parent, in this case the mother, sought to have the father’s visitation rights modified and brought a separate action in the county of residence of the father, the noncustodial parent. This was proper under OCGA § 19-9-23 (a).”7); Alberti v. Alberti, 320 Ga. App. 724, 728 (741 SE2d 179) (2013) (holding that a father’s petition to change custody was not barred by § 19-9-23 (c) (1) even though it was “predicated on the [m]other’s successful 7 While Jones refers to § 19-9-23 (a), the mother in that case was clearly the primary physical custodian, so the reference should have been to subsection (b)....
...primary physical custody or visitation rights following efforts by the other parent to enforce the existing child custody order. See Hutto v. Hutto, 250 Ga. 116, 118 (296 SE2d 549) (1982) (explaining that a father with visitation rights who was prevented by what is now § 19-9-23 (c) (1) from filing a counterclaim seeking a change of custody in response to the mother’s petition for habeas corpus filed in father’s county of residence was not without recourse, as he could file a separate complaint seeking a change of custody in the mother’s county of residence). In short, OCGA § 19-9-23 governs how and where an action seeking a change of primary physical custody or visitation rights must be filed, not whether such an action can be filed at all when a child custody enforcement action by the other parent is pending. Thus, § 19-9-23 did not require the trial court to grant Father’s motion to dismiss. 22 (c) We turn next to OCGA § 19-9-24.8 Father relies on subsection (b), which...
Copy

Facey v. Facey, 638 S.E.2d 273 (Ga. 2006).

Cited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 27, 2006 | 281 Ga. 367, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 8

...rmanent awards; nothing in the language of the "status report" provision provides that the court can issue a modification of custody, visitation, or child support without a petition being properly filed by one of the parties. See OCGA §§ 19-6-19 & 19-9-23....
Copy

Kemp v. Sharp, 409 S.E.2d 204 (Ga. 1991).

Cited 16 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 18, 1991 | 261 Ga. 600

...of modifying the custody provisions of the divorce decree. 2. The trial court ruled that although it had jurisdiction over Sharp for purposes of the contempt action, venue for the custody claim was properly in Texas because of the provision in OCGA § 19-9-23 that custody actions be brought in the county of residence of the legal custodian of the child....
Copy

Kapur v. Roach, 534 S.E.2d 420 (Ga. 2000).

Cited 10 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Sep 11, 2000 | 272 Ga. 767, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 3551

...The case was transferred by agreement to Whitfield County. The husband thereafter amended his answer by adding a counterclaim for sole custody. The wife sought to have the counterclaim dismissed or transferred to her county of residence pursuant to OCGA § 19-9-23(a) because the husband's claim seeking changed custody was not brought as a separate action in the county where she resided....
...The Court of Appeals reversed, Roach v. Kapur, 240 Ga.App. 558, 524 S.E.2d 246 (1999), and we granted certiorari to the husband to consider whether the wife's raising of the custody issue in her suit against him constituted a waiver of venue-based objections premised on OCGA § 19-9-23. Finding that it does not, we affirm. OCGA § 19-9-23(b) of the Georgia Child Custody Intrastate Jurisdiction Act provides that "[a] complaint by the legal custodian seeking a change of legal custody ......
...See also Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. VI (all civil cases shall be tried in county where defendant resides). Hence, transfer of the petition to change custody to the husband's county of residence was proper. Conversely, pursuant to OCGA § 19-9-23(a) of the Act, after a court determines who is to be the legal custodian of a child, [1] any complaint by a noncustodian seeking to change legal custody must be brought as a separate action in the county of residence of the legal custodian. OCGA § 19-9-23(a)....
...201, 232 S.E.2d 76 (1977) allowing the noncustodial parent to relitigate custody in his own jurisdiction. See McConaughey, Ga. Divorce, Alimony and Child Custody (1999 ed.), § 21-1. Georgia law also provides that a complaint seeking to obtain a change of legal custody as set forth in OCGA § 19-9-23 subsections (a) or (b) cannot be made as a counterclaim. OCGA § 19-9-23(c)(1). Jones v. Jones, supra at 256 Ga. 742, 352 S.E.2d 754; In the Interest of S.K.R., 229 Ga.App. 652, 494 S.E.2d 558 (1997). The husband argues that the mandatory provisions of OCGA § 19-9-23(a) and (c) were effectively waived by the wife's consent transfer of her case, including her claim for a change in custody, to his county of residence....
Copy

Douglas v. Douglas, 678 S.E.2d 904 (Ga. 2009).

Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 15, 2009 | 285 Ga. 548, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2001

...201, 232 S.E.2d 76 (1977); Tyree v. Jackson, 226 Ga. 690, 692(1), 177 S.E.2d 160 (1970). However, the Act, which became effective in January of 1979, now specifically prohibits the use of a complaint in the nature of habeas corpus to seek a change of child custody. OCGA § 19-9-23(d); Munday v....
...Munday, 243 Ga. 863, 257 S.E.2d 282 (1979). Instead, the Act mandates that "any complaint seeking to obtain a change of legal custody of the child shall be brought as a separate action in the county of residence of the legal custodian of the child." OCGA § 19-9-23(a)....
...However, even where a legal custodian brings such a habeas action, no complaint seeking to change custody may be made "[a]s a counterclaim or in any other manner in response to a petition for a writ of habeas corpus seeking to enforce a child custody order...." OCGA § 19-9-23(c)(1)....
...ence of the legal custodian]." Hutto v. Hutto, supra at 118, 296 S.E.2d 549. Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur, except BENHAM, J., who dissents. BENHAM, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent to Division 2 of the majority opinion. OCGA § 19-9-23(c) is inapplicable to this case because the mother has not raised nor asserted any claim or counterclaim for a change in legal custody in response to this habeas action....
...Indeed, in Hutto, the non-legal custodial parent acted without any authority, unilaterally removing the child from school and withholding her from the legal custodian. In this case, the child came into the mother's custody by a lawful order. Thus, this case may be distinguished from Hutto. The majority's insistence that OCGA § 19-9-23(c) applies in this case also leads to an unjust result....
Copy

Bales v. Lowery, 299 Ga. 200 (Ga. 2016).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 6, 2016 | 787 S.E.2d 166

...egal custody or visitation rights may be made ‘[a]s a counterclaim or in any other manner in 5 response to a petition for a writ of habeas corpus seeking to enforce a child custody order . . . .’ OCGA § 19-9-23 (c) (1).” Douglas, 285 Ga....
Copy

Upchurch v. Smith, 635 S.E.2d 710 (Ga. 2006).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 2, 2006 | 281 Ga. 28, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 3004

...The question thus is whether the Cobb County court's February 2004 order qualified as a child custody determination under OCGA § 19-9-62(a). [1] It is undisputed that Smith and the children had resided in Cobb County for more than six months prior to Upchurch filing his 2002 modification action; that under OCGA § 19-9-23 Cobb County was the proper venue for that action; and that neither of the events enumerated in OCGA § 19-9-62(a), which would extinguish Cobb County's continuing jurisdiction, has occurred....
...support. See Moccia v. Moccia, 277 Ga. 571(1), 592 S.E.2d 664 (2004); Bodne v. Bodne, 277 Ga. 445, 588 S.E.2d 728 (2003). Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur. NOTES [1] We reject Smith's argument that venue in this case is determined by OCGA § 19-9-23 inasmuch as that provision is part of the Georgia Child Custody Intrastate Jurisdiction Act and has no application to out-of-state defendants....
Copy

Columbus v. Gaines, 253 Ga. 518 (Ga. 1984).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 6, 1984 | 322 S.E.2d 259

...Although this appeal did not involve a judgment for divorce, the complaint was not “in the nature of habeas corpus seeking a change of custody,” which is prohibited by the Georgia Child Custody Intrastate Jurisdiction Act of 1978 (Ga. L. 1978, p. 1957; OCGA § 19-9-23 (d)), appeals from judgments entered pursuant to which Act are within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals....
Copy

Andersen v. Farrington, 291 Ga. 775 (Ga. 2012).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Sep 10, 2012 | 731 S.E.2d 351, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 2739

...Wife asserts husband’s motion seeking a change in custody should have been filed in Fulton County, not Forsyth County, because wife had primary physical custody of the children, OCGA § 19-9-22 (2), and she resided in Fulton County when husband sought a custody change. See OCGA § 19-9-23 (a)....
Copy

DeKalb Cnty. Dep't of Fam. & Child. Servs. v. Queen, 252 Ga. 274 (Ga. 1984).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 7, 1984 | 312 S.E.2d 800

...a change of child custody is prohibited, and that after a judicial determination of custody, any complaint seeking to obtain a change of legal custody of the child shall be brought in the county of residence of the legal custodian of the child. OCGA § 19-9-23 (Code Ann....