Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §19-9-68, enacted by Ga. L. 2001, p. 129, § 1.)
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, annotations decided under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, former Code 1933, §§ 74-501 through 74-525, subsequently codified as §§ 19-9-40 through19-9-64, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- It is in public interest to discourage conduct such as noncustodial parent seeking custody in this state while withholding children in defiance of another state's order, without any prejudice whatsoever to the noncustodial parent's right to bring such a petition where the legal custodian and children reside. Reid v. Adams, 241 Ga. 521, 246 S.E.2d 655 (1978) (decided under former Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act).
- That petition represents complaint for modification rather than for initial decree, and that divorce was originally obtained in Georgia rather than in another state, are not facts of such material import as to control decision. Graham v. Hajosy, 159 Ga. App. 466, 283 S.E.2d 683 (1981) (decided under former Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act).
- Georgia courts will not relitigate custody except where legal custodian resides. Yearta v. Scroggins, 245 Ga. 831, 268 S.E.2d 151 (1980) (decided under former Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act).
- If it is in the child's best interest that child custody be changed, noncustodial parent must, instead of snatching child, seek change of custody where jurisdiction lies. Etzion v. Evans, 247 Ga. 390, 276 S.E.2d 577 (1981) (decided under former Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act).
- As a matter of public policy, Georgia courts refuse to provide forum in Georgia for relitigating custody when noncustodial parent resident in Georgia improperly has removed child from physical custody of custodial parent who resides in another state. Etzion v. Evans, 247 Ga. 390, 276 S.E.2d 577 (1981) (decided under former Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act).
Trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear an action for modification of custody brought by father, when the mother had legal custody and lived with the child in a different state, the child was temporarily visiting the father in Georgia, there was no extreme emergency authorizing the conduct of the father in denying custody to the mother, and there was no substantial evidence otherwise sufficient to vest jurisdiction in the Georgia court. Lightfoot v. Lightfoot, 210 Ga. App. 400, 436 S.E.2d 700 (1993) (decided under former Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act).
- Mother was not entitled to attorney fees pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 19-9-68 since the father never alleged or presented evidence that the mother no longer resided in Kansas, but the Georgia trial court's holding to that effect was due to the court's own error, and was not based on any alleged unjustifiable conduct by the father. Delgado v. Combs, 314 Ga. App. 419, 724 S.E.2d 436 (2012), cert. denied, No. S12C1106, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 602 (Ga. 2012).
Cited in Gorelik v. Gorelik, Ga. App. , 815 S.E.2d 330 (2018).
- 20 Am. Jur. 2d, Courts, §§ 59, 109 et seq.
- 21 C.J.S., Courts, §§ 80 et seq., 103.
- Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (U.L.A.) § 8.
- Child custody: when does state that issued previous custody determination have continuing jurisdiction under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA) or Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act (PKPA), 28 USCS § 1738A, 83 A.L.R.4th 742.
Parties' misconduct as ground for declining jurisdiction under § 8 of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA), 16 A.L.R.5th 650.
Total Results: 4
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-03-06
Citation: 300 Ga. 702, 797 S.E.2d 868, 2017 WL 875044, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 160
Snippet: appropriate forum under Code Section 19-9-67 or 19-9-68 and: (A) The child andthe child’s parents, or the
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-05-06
Citation: 292 Ga. 888, 742 S.E.2d 717, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1458, 2013 WL 1867087, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 413
Snippet: appropriate forum under Code Section 19-9-67 or 19-9-68 and: (A) The child and the child’s parents, or
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-05-16
Citation: 710 S.E.2d 139, 289 Ga. 208, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 1470, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 384, 2011 WL 1836195
Snippet: appeared for the hearing on same. See, e.g., OCGA § 19-9-68(a)(1), (3). Accordingly, the trial court's denial
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-02-07
Citation: 706 S.E.2d 78, 288 Ga. 495, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 202, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 91
Snippet: appropriate forum under Code Section 19-9-67 or 19-9-68 and: (A) The child and the child's parents, or