O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 20-2-504 (2019)

Authority to contract for pupil transportation

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Statute text

County, independent, and area school systems shall have authority to contract for the transportation of pupils in accordance with the provisions of Code Section 20-2-506.

History

(Ga. L. 1919, p. 288, § 102; Code 1933, § 32-928; Ga. L. 1947, p. 1142, § 1; Ga. L. 1990, p. 1035, § 1.)

Annotations

Cross references. - Power to enter into transportation contracts, § 20- 2-1071.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Section is not applicable to contracts made before the law's passage. Board of Educ. v. Southern Mich. Nat'l Bank, 184 Ga. 641, 192 S.E. 382 (1937).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1986–1995 · leading case: Servicemaster Mgmt. Servs. Corp. v. Cherokee Cnty. Sch. Sys., 354 S.E.2d 424 (Ga. 1987).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Servicemaster Mgmt. Servs. Corp. v. Cherokee Cnty. Sch. Sys., 354 S.E.2d 424 (Ga. 1987). · cites it 2× “We have received the following certified questions from The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit: “(1) Whether, in light of appellee’s claim that the contract is void under O.C.G.A. § 20-2-504, appellant’s service contract action is a ‘matter of *61 local…”

Pub. Broad. Ass'n v. ATLANTA CITY Sch. Dist., 457 S.E.2d 814 (Ga. 1995). · cites it 4× “2d 424 (rejecting argument that claim involved school law because complaint alleged service contract was void under former OCGA § 20-2-504).”

Servicemaster Mgmt. Servs. Corp. v. Cherokee Cnty. Sch. Sys., 629 F. Supp. 896 (N.D. Ga. 1986). · cites it 8× “§ 20-2-504, a provision of the Education Title of the Georgia Code which makes it unlawful “for any board of education to make any contract involving the expenditure of funds in excess of the total appropriation for the current fiscal year [except for contracts for the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.