Editor's notes.

- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Ga. L. 1935, p. 7, which was subsequently repealed but was succeeded by provisions in this Code section, are included in the annotations for this Code section.

Section conflicts with Constitution, which does not prevent suit by or against board of regents.

- Since it is clear that the power to sue and be sued existed in the board of regents at the time of the adoption of the 1943 constitutional amendment and the 1945 Constitution and was reenacted as part of the 1976 Constitution, an Act attempting to provide sovereign immunity for the board of regents is in direct conflict with the constitution. As to the board of regents, O.C.G.A. § 20-3-36 is an attempt to diminish the powers and duties of the board of regents contrary to the constitution, and in no way prevents the board of regents from suing to protect the board's other powers and duties or from being sued. McCafferty v. Medical College, 249 Ga. 62, 287 S.E.2d 171 (1982).

Regents immune from suit.

- Although the Regents of the University System of Georgia is a corporate body, established by O.C.G.A. § 20-3-20, neither that section nor any other provision following the statute have granted the corporation any power to sue or be sued. The regents are therefore immune from suit under O.C.G.A. § 20-3-36, since the powers and duties of the corporation do not have the constitutional status of the board of regents' powers and duties. McCafferty v. Medical College, 249 Ga. 62, 287 S.E.2d 171 (1982).

Suit against regents is suit against the state and cannot be maintained without the state's consent. Ramsey v. Hamilton, 181 Ga. 365, 182 S.E. 392 (1935) (decided under former Ga. L. 1935, p. 7).

Board's immunity under the doctrine of sovereign immunity was not waived when an endorsement eliminating the self-insurance character of the board's insurance plan was not void for any failure to comply with the provisions of the Insurance Code, which does not apply to the board. Board of Regents v. Tyson, 261 Ga. 368, 404 S.E.2d 557 (1991).

Board's immunity under the doctrine of sovereign immunity was not waived, when hospital records, including a "consent to care" form, upon which a patient's action was based, did not constitute a written contract. Board of Regents v. Tyson, 261 Ga. 368, 404 S.E.2d 557 (1991).

Board's sovereign immunity was waived.

- Trial court properly granted summary judgment to an applicant for university employment as to the issue of finding a valid and written contract, thus finding that the state's sovereign immunity was waived; however, summary judgment was reversed as jury issues remained as to: (1) whether the university board of regents breached the contract; (2) whether university officials violated an implied duty to use their best efforts to secure the board's approval of the applicant's appointment, whether the officials acted in bad faith when the applicants withdrew the appointment, and whether the officials were solely responsible for the failure of the board to vote on the appointment; and (3) whether the applicant's alleged misconduct rendered the continued pursuit of the appointment impossible or impracticable, and whether the applicant ratified the withdrawal of the appointment. Board of Regents of the Univ. Sys. v. Doe, 278 Ga. App. 878, 630 S.E.2d 85 (2006).

Cited in Meadows Motors, Inc. v. Department of Admin. Servs., 141 Ga. App. 224, 233 S.E.2d 14 (1977); Goolsby v. Regents of Univ. Sys., 141 Ga. App. 605, 234 S.E.2d 165 (1977); C.F.I. Constr. Co. v. Board of Regents of Univ. Sys., 145 Ga. App. 471, 243 S.E.2d 700 (1978); Nat'l Ass'n of Bds. of Pharm. v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. Sys. of Ga., F. Supp. 2d (M.D. Ga. Apr. 18, 2008).

Employment by board of regents constitutes employment by state department or agency.

- Employment by the board of regents in a position in the University System of Georgia is employment by or the rendition of services for a state department or agency. 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 81-13.

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 15A Am. Jur. 2d, Colleges and Universities, § 44.

C.J.S.

- 14A C.J.S., Colleges and Universities, § 53.

ALR.

- Remedy available against invalid judgment in favor of United States, state, or other governmental unit immune to suit, 163 A.L.R. 244.

Civil liability of school officials for malicious prosecution, 66 A.L.R.2d 749.

Tort liability of public schools and institutions of higher learning, 86 A.L.R.2d 489.

Modern status of doctrine of sovereign immunity as applied to public schools and institutions of higher learning, 33 A.L.R.3d 703.

Tort liability of public schools and institutions of higher learning for accidents due to condition of buildings or equipment, 34 A.L.R.3d 1166.

Tort liability of public schools and institutions of higher learning for accident occurring during school athletic events, 35 A.L.R.3d 725.

Tort liability of public schools and institutions of higher learning for accidents associated with chemistry experiments, shopwork, and manual or vocational training, 35 A.L.R.3d 758.

Tort liability of private schools and institutions of higher learning for accidents due to condition of buildings, equipment, or outside premises, 35 A.L.R.3d 975.

Tort liability of public schools and institutions of higher learning for injuries resulting from lack or insufficiency of supervision, 38 A.L.R.3d 830.

Liability of school authorities for hiring or retaining incompetent or otherwise unsuitable teacher, 60 A.L.R.4th 260.

Tort liability of college, university, fraternity, or sorority for injury or death of member or prospective member by hazing or initiation activity, 68 A.L.R.4th 228.

Admissibility, in homicide prosecution, of evidence as to tests made to ascertain distance from gun to victim when gun was fired, 11 A.L.R.5th 497.

Tort liability of public schools and institutions of higher learning for accidents associated with the transportation of students, 23 A.L.R.5th 1.

Tort liability for hazing or initiation rituals associated with schools, colleges, or universities, 100 A.L.R.6th 365.