O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 50-21-1 (2019)

Waiver of sovereign immunity as to actions ex contractu for breach of written contract to which state is party; venue

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The defense of sovereign immunity is waived as to any action ex contractu for the breach of any written contract existing on April 12, 1982, or thereafter entered into by the state, departments and agencies of the state, and state authorities. (b) Venue with respect to any such action shall be proper in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia. The provisions of this subsection shall be cumulative and supplemental to any other venue provisions permitted on April 12, 1982, or thereafter permitted by law.

History

Ga. L. 1982, p. 495, § 1; Code 1981, § 50-21-1, enacted by Ga. L. 1982, p. 495, § 2; Ga. L. 1984, p. 22, § 50.

Annotations

Law reviews. - For annual survey of

Administrative Law, see 57 Mercer L. Rev. 1 (2005). For article, ‘‘Administrative Law,’’ see 63 Mercer L. Rev. 47 (2011).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Venue. - Trial court had jurisdiction over the plaintiff ’s suit for breach of contract filed in the State Court of Fulton County because the plain meaning of the last sentence of O.C.G.A. § 50-21-1(b) shows that venue for such a claim is not exclusive to the Superior Court of Fulton County, but rather that venue in that court shall be cumulative and supplemental to other legal venue. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. Sys. of Ga. v. Winter, 331 Ga. App. 528, 771 S.E.2d 201 (2015), overruled on other grounds, Rivera v. Washington, 298 Ga. 770, 784 S.E.2d 775 (Ga. 2016). Action by state retirees for breach and impairment of contract not barred. - Georgia Tort Claims Act (GTCA), O.C.G.A. § 50-21-20 et seq., did not bar a state employees’ breach and

impairment of contract suit against the Employees Retirement System of the State of Georgia as the action sounded in contract and O.C.G.A. § 50-21-1, which was not part of the GTCA, which waived sovereign immunity as to an action ex contractu for the breach of a written contract. Alverson v. Employees’ Ret. Sys., 272 Ga. App. 389, 613 S.E.2d 119 (2005). No waiver of immunity for oral contracts. - Even though sovereign immunity has been waived for the breach of any written contract, O.C.G.A. § 50-21-1, there has been no such waiver for oral contracts. Soloski v. Adams, 600 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (N.D. Ga. 2009). No waiver of immunity in federal court. - Because Georgia did not waive the states’ Eleventh Amendment immunity, the federal district court lacked juris-

diction to decide the student’s breach of contract claim against the Board of Regents. Barnes v. Zaccari, 669 F.3d 1295 (11th Cir. 2012). Medical college faculty members. - In a medical malpractice suit, two physicians were entitled to official immunity under O.C.G.A. §§ 50-21-23(b) and 50-21-25(a) because the record established that the physicians were full-time faculty members at a Georgia medical college performing the physicians’ regular duties of employment at the time the estate’s decedent was allegedly injured. Cook v. Forrester, 323 Ga. App. 631, 746 S.E.2d 624 (2013). Immunity waived for surety’s subrogation action against state. - Surety on a public contract, after assisting the contractor in completing the project, stood in the place of the contractor and was subrogated to the contractor’s right of action for breach of contract against the Georgia Department of Corrections; under Ga. Const 1983, Art. I, Sec. II, Para. IX(c), the state waived sovereign immunity for contracts. State Dep’t of Corr. v. Developers Sur. & Indem. Co., 295 Ga. 741, 763 S.E.2d 868 (2014).

Immunity of city in dispute with firefighters. - In a dispute over compensation between firefighters and the city, alleged course of conduct by the parties was ineffective to waive sovereign immunity. Shelnutt v. Mayor & Aldermen of Savannah, 349 Ga. App. 499, 826 S.E.2d 379 (2019). No waiver without written contract. - Developer failed to meet the developer’s burden of showing waiver of sovereign immunity because even if the parties’ conduct after the expiration of the contract could be found to demonstrate that the developer was to continue to perform under the original contract, as a matter of law, neither that conduct nor the internal documents created by a state agency after the contract expired established a written contract to do so and without a written contract, the state’s sovereign immunity was not waived. Georgia Department of Labor v. RTT Associates, Inc., 299 Ga. 78, 786 S.E.2d 840 (2016). Cited in Fedorov v. Bd. of Regents, 194 F. Supp. 2d 1378 (S.D. Ga. 2002); Bd. of Regents of the Univ. Sys. of Ga. v. One Sixty Over Ninety, LLC, 351 Ga. App. 133, 830 S.E.2d 503 (2019).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 72 Am. Jur. 2d, States, Territories, and Dependencies, § 96.

C.J.S. - 81A C.J.S., States, § 533 et seq.

ARTICLE 2 STATE TORT CLAIMS Law reviews. - For article, ‘‘The 1992 Georgia Tort Claims Act,’’ see 9 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 431 (1993). For article, ‘‘Tort Claims Against the State: Georgia’s Compensation System,’’ see 32 Ga. L. Rev. 1103 (1998). For article on administrative law, see 53 Mercer L. Rev. 81 (2001). For article, ‘‘Torts,’’ see 53 Mercer L. Rev. 441 (2001). For article, ‘‘Trial Practice and Procedure,’’ see 53 Mercer L. Rev. 475

(2001). For annual survey of administrative law, see 56 Mercer L. Rev. 31 (2004). For annual survey on administrative law, see 66 Mercer L. Rev. 1 (2014). For note on 1992 enactment of this article, see 9 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 349 (1992). For comment, ‘‘Abrogating Sovereign Immunity Pursuant to its Bankruptcy Clause Power: Congress Went Too Far!,’’ see 13 Bank. Dev. J. 197 (1996).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 40 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: Georgia Dep't of Labor v. Rtt Assocs., Inc., 786 S.E.2d 840 (Ga. 2016).
Georgia Dep't of Labor v. Rtt Assocs., Inc., 786 S.E.2d 840 (Ga. 2016). · cites it 10× “Accordingly, since the DOL is an agency of the state, 3 it is immune from suit except as specifically waived in the Constitution or by an act of the General Assembly Pursuant to OCGA § 50-21-1 (a), the General Assembly has provided that sovereign immunity is waived in a contract…”
State of Georgia v. Fed. Def. Prog., Inc., 315 Ga. 319 (Ga. 2022). · cites it 12× “See also OCGA § 50-21-1 (a) (“The defense of sovereign immunity is waived as to any action ex contractu for the breach of any written contract .”
Seay v. Cleveland, 508 S.E.2d 159 (Ga. 1998). · cites it 6× “The trial court denied Seay’s motion and granted a directed verdict in favor of the Clevelands finding that sovereign immunity does not apply to Seay because the deputies’ acts were ministerial.”
Bd. of Regents of the Univ. Sys. of Georgia v. Winter, 771 S.E.2d 201 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 8× “The Board claims that OCGA § 50-21-1 requires that all breach of contract claims against the Board of Regents must be brought in the Superior Court of Fulton County.”
Bulloch Cnty. Sch. Dist. v. Georgia Dep't of Educ., 751 S.E.2d 495 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 10× “IX (c) and OCGA § 50-21-1 (a). Because the District’s claim is barred by sovereign immunity, we affirm.”
Georgia Dep't of Corr. v. Couch, 759 S.E.2d 804 (Ga. 2014). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 50-21-1 (a) similarly says: “The defense of sovereign immunity is waived as to any action ex contractu for the breach of any written contract existing on April 12, 1982, or thereafter entered into by the state, departments and agencies of the state, and state authorities.”
Alverson v. Employees' Ret. Sys., 613 S.E.2d 119 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “” 17 And through the enactment of OCGA § 50-21-1, the General Assembly also provided for a waiver of sovereign immunity as to actions ex contractu for the breach of written contracts.”
Rtt Assocs., Inc. v. Georgia Dep't of Labor, 775 S.E.2d 644 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 12× “” 1 OCGA § 50-21-1 (a) restates this constitutional waiver of sovereign immunity and provides: “The defense of sovereign immunity is waived as to any action ex contractu for the breach of any written contract[.”
Soloski v. Adams, 600 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (N.D. Ga. 2009). · cites it 4× “Even though sovereign immunity has been waived “for the breach of any written contract,” O.C.G.A. § 50-21-1 (emphasis added), there has been no such waiver for oral contracts.”
Upper Oconee Basin Water Auth. v. Jackson Cnty., 699 S.E.2d 605 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “Specifically, the County argues that its amended petition sets forth a breach of contract action alleging the Authority breached the Agreement by failing to recalculate the Established Yield and seeking specific performance to remedy that alleged breach.”
One Sixty Over Ninety, LLC v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. Sys. of Georgia, 830 S.E.2d 503 (Ga. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “, OCGA § 50-21-1 (a) ("The defense of sovereign immunity is waived as to any action ex contractu for the breach of any written contract .”
State of Ga. v. Stuckey Health Care, 375 S.E.2d 235 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 4× “See also OCGA § 50-21-1 (a). Having determined in Division 1, supra, that recovery was proper under the contract between appellants and appellee, it follows that a defense based on sovereign immunity is not available to appellants.”
— 50-21-1(a) — 2 cases
Fedorov v. Bd. of Regents for Univ. of Ga., 194 F. Supp. 2d 1378 (S.D. Ga. 2002).
— 50-21-1(b) — 2 cases
Langston Austin v. Glynn Cnty., Georgia, 80 F.4th 1342 (11th Cir. 2023).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.