O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 20-3-66 (2019)

Determination of in-state resident status of students for tuition or fees

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) As used in this Code section, the term:

(1) ‘‘Dependent student’’ means an individual under the age of 24 who receives financial support from a parent or United States court appointed legal guardian.

(2) ‘‘Emancipated’’ means a minor who, under certain circumstances, may be treated by the law as an adult. A student reaching the age of 18 shall not qualify for consideration of reclassification by virtue of having become emancipated unless he or she can demonstrate financial independence and domicile independent of his or her parents.

(3) ‘‘Independent student’’ means an individual who is not claimed as a dependent on the federal or state income tax returns of a parent or United States court appointed legal guardian and whose parent or guardian has ceased to provide support and right to that individual’s care, custody, and earnings.

(b)(1) An independent student who has established and maintained a domicile in the State of Georgia for a period of at least 12 consecutive months immediately preceding the first day of classes for the term shall be classified as in-state for tuition purposes. No student shall gain or acquire in-state classification while attending any postsecondary educational institution in this state without clear evidence of having established domicile in Georgia for purposes other than attending a postsecondary educational institution in this state.

(2) If an independent student classified as in-state for tuition purposes relocates out of state temporarily but returns to the State of Georgia within 12 months of the relocation, such student shall be entitled to retain his or her in-state tuition classification.

(c)(1) A dependent student shall be classified as in-state for tuition purposes if such dependent student’s parent has established and maintained domicile in the State of Georgia for at least 12 consecutive months immediately preceding the first day of classes for the term and:

(A) The student has graduated from a Georgia high school; or

(B) The parent claimed the student as a dependent on the parent’s most recent federal or state income tax return.

(2) A dependent student shall be classified as in-state for tuition purposes if such student’s United States court appointed legal guardian has established and maintained domicile in the State of Georgia for at least 12 consecutive months immediately preceding the first day of classes for the term, provided that such appointment was not made to avoid payment of out-of-state tuition, and such guardian can provide clear evidence of having established and maintained domicile in the State of Georgia for a period of at least 12 consecutive months immediately preceding the first day of classes for the term.

(3) If the parent or United States court appointed legal guardian of a dependent student currently classified as in-state for tuition purposes establishes domicile outside of the State of Georgia after having established and maintained domicile in the State of Georgia, such student may retain his or her in-state tuition classification so long as such student remains continuously enrolled in a public postsecondary educational institution in this state, regardless of the domicile of such student’s parent or United States court appointed legal guardian.

(d) Noncitizen students shall not be classified as in-state for tuition purposes unless the student is legally in this state and there is evidence to warrant consideration of in-state classification as determined by the board of regents. Lawful permanent residents, refugees, asylees, or other eligible noncitizens as defined by federal Title IV regulations may be extended the same consideration as citizens of the United States in determining whether they qualify for in-state classification. International students who reside in the United States under nonimmigrant status conditioned at least in part upon intent not to abandon a foreign domicile shall not be eligible for in-state classification.

History

(Ga. L. 1972, p. 193, § 8; Ga. L. 2008, p. 759, § 1/SB 492.)

Annotations

Cross references. - Rights of citizens of other states while in Georgia generally, § 1-2-9. Resident status of persons in

state for purpose of attending school, § 39-1-1.

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 15A Am. Jur. 2d, Colleges and Universities, § 23. C.J.S. - 14A C.J.S., Colleges and Universities, § 33. ALR. - Determination of residence or nonresidence for purpose of fixing tuition fees or the like in public school or college, 83 ALR2d 497; 56 ALR3d 641.

Validity and application of provisions governing determination of residency for purpose of fixing fee differential for out-of-state students in public college, 56 ALR3d 641.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2017–2017 · leading case: Alford v. Hernandez, 807 S.E.2d 84 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).
Alford v. Hernandez, 807 S.E.2d 84 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 8× “The Appellees asked the superior court to issue a writ of mandamus to compel the Appellants to comply with OCGA § 20-3-66 (d) 8 and Board Rules 4.3.”
C. Dean Alford v. Rigoberto Rivera Hernandez (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 8× “Specifically, the Appellees claimed that, as DACA recipients, the federal government considered them to be “lawfully present” in the United States and that the Appellants had failed to discharge their duty when they refused to accept this classification when determining whether…”
C. Dean Alford v. Rigoberto Rivera Hernandez (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 6× “Denied in-state tuition status on the basis that they did not meet the residency requirements set forth in the Board of Regents (“BOR”) Policy Manual, the DACA Recipients petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandamus to compel the Board Members to correctly implement and…”
C. Dean Alford v. Rigoberto Rivera Hernandez (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 6× “1 Denied in-state tuition status on the basis that they did not meet the residency requirements set forth in the Board of Regents (“BOR”) Policy Manual, the DACA Recipients petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandamus to compel the Board Members to correctly implement…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.