Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448"I understand that the offer or acceptance of money or any other object of value to vote for any particular candidate, list of candidates, issue, or list of issues included in this election constitutes an act of voter fraud and is a felony under Georgia law."
(Ga. L. 1922, p. 97, §§ 2, 3; Code 1933, §§ 34-1903, 34-1904; Ga. L. 1941, p. 324, § 1; Ga. L. 1948, Ex. Sess., p. 3, § 1; Ga. L. 1958, p. 208, § 6; Ga. L. 1962, p. 98, § 1; Ga. L. 1962, p. 618, § 1; Code 1933, § 34-1103, enacted by Ga. L. 1964, Ex. Sess., p. 26, § 1; Ga. L. 1965, p. 226, § 1; Ga. L. 1968, p. 851, § 1; Ga. L. 1969, p. 329, § 12; Ga. L. 1982, p. 1512, § 5; Ga. L. 1983, p. 140, § 1; Ga. L. 1986, p. 772, § 3; Ga. L. 1986, p. 1538, § 1; Ga. L. 1993, p. 118, § 1; Ga. L. 1994, p. 279, § 2; Ga. L. 1997, p. 590, § 28; Ga. L. 1998, p. 295, § 1; Ga. L. 1998, p. 1231, §§ 10, 34; Ga. L. 2001, p. 269, § 17; Ga. L. 2002, p. 598, § 2-7; Ga. L. 2005, p. 253, § 36/HB 244; Ga. L. 2012, p. 995, § 22/SB 92.)
The 2012 amendment, effective July 1, 2012, in subsection (f), in the third sentence, inserted "or questions to be presented to the electors of more than one county" near the beginning and inserted "and shall include a short title or heading in bold face at the beginning of each such question on the ballot" near the end.
- Appearance of candidate's name on ballot, Official Compilation of the Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia, Georgia Election Code, Ballots, Sec. 183-1-11-.02.
Spoiled absentee ballots, Official Compilation of the Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia, Georgia Election Code, Absentee Voting, Sec. 183-1-14-.06.
Spoiled ballot definition, Official Compilation of the Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia, Georgia Election Code, Absentee Voting, Sec. 183-1-14-.07.
- For note on the 2001 amendment to O.C.G.A. § 21-2-285, see 18 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 96 (2001).
- States have broad authority, absent valid congressional legislation, to establish rules regulating the manner of conducting both primary and final elections. Williamson v. Fortson, 376 F. Supp. 1300 (N.D. Ga. 1974).
There are many types of information which could serve to reduce voter confusion if they were included in the ballot. The determination of what should be included is a state function. Williamson v. Fortson, 376 F. Supp. 1300 (N.D. Ga. 1974).
- The prohibition of the use of stamps or stickers is not unconstitutional on its face. Morris v. Fortson, 261 F. Supp. 538 (N.D. Ga. 1966).
- See Buttrill v. Thomas, 126 Ga. App. 498, 191 S.E.2d 119 (1972).
- A trial court properly denied a losing candidate's petition to contest the election results of a mayoral election held in a town as the losing candidate failed to meet the burden of establishing that any misconduct, fraud, or irregularity occurred that placed the result of the election in doubt based on the county clerk signing the document reflecting the election results, instead of the election superintendent, and the clerk's failure to purge the voters list, which was not an obligation of the election supervisor anyway. The omission of the statutory language providing directions on how to cast a vote likewise did not necessitate a new election since the poll manager testified that the poll manager and other poll workers instructed each voter how to fill out the ballot and established that there was no concern or confusion by the voters regarding the ballot. Lewis v. O'Day, 284 Ga. 423, 667 S.E.2d 594 (2008).
- Trial court properly dismissed a nominee's lawsuit seeking to have the nominee's name placed upon the ballot for the 2016 general election as an independent candidate for President of the United States because the notices of candidacy were submitted 11 days after the deadline set forth in O.C.G.A. § 21-2-132(d)(1) and the nominee failed to have enough signatures verified; thus, the nominee was not entitled to have the nominee's name placed on the ballot. De La Fuente v. Kemp, 300 Ga. 79, 793 S.E.2d 89 (2016).
Cited in McCrary v. Poythress, 638 F.2d 1308 (5th Cir. 1981).
- In light of the similarity of the provisions, opinions under former Code 1933 § 34A-1004 and former Code Section 21-3-187 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- A special municipal election, otherwise required by law, must be conducted notwithstanding the existence of the conditions set forth in this section. 1980 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U80-15 (decided under former Code 1933, § 34A-1004).
- Where neither a party nominee nor a write-in candidate files notice of intention of candidacy in opposition to an already qualified candidate in a municipal general or special election, then no name for that race shall appear on the ballot. 1982 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U82-10 (decided under former Code 1933, § 34A-1004).
- It was reasonable that former Code 1933, §§ 34-1102 and 34-1103 (see O.C.G.A. §§ 21-2-284 and21-2-285) prescribing form for paper ballots, control questions of form of ballot cards where former Code 1933, § 34-1223 (formerly § 21-2-357), governing ballot cards, did not expressly provide an answer to the question raised. 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 81-68 (decided under former Code 1933, § 34-1103).
- Where no candidate of either party nor an independent qualifies for an office to be filled at a general election, the title to the office should be printed on the ballot and then a note should be written under the title in each party's column that there is no candidate for that office. 1968 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 68-411 (decided under former Code 1933, § 34-1103).
- Ga. L. 1933, § 34-1323 (see O.C.G.A. § 21-2-438) does not remove the restrictions on the use of stickers, pasters, stamps, etc., as contained in former Code 1933, § 34-1103 (see O.C.G.A. § 21-2-285). 1976 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U76-45 (decided under former Code 1933, § 34-1323).
- Ballot cards used in conjunction with vote recorders may not be prepunched to designate election districts (now precincts) or political parties in lieu of printing such information on cards, but may be so prepunched in addition to printing such information on cards. 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 81-68.
Where precinct and political party are designated by printing, such designations may be prepunched to obviate confusion and concern among voters; however, it would be wise to also include explanatory language to the effect that the "ballot has been prepunched only so as to indicate information printed immediately above." 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 81-68.
- An elector, when casting a write-in vote, may use abbreviations in the title of the office if the write-in office has been abbreviated in such a way that the elector has indicated clearly and without question the office for which the elector voted. 1968 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 68-434.
Poll officers are required to count as valid any ballot on which an elector has indicated clearly and without question the candidate for whom the elector desires to cast a vote, notwithstanding the fact the elector has not marked the elector's ballot in accordance with the Election Code. 1976 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U76-45.
- In those instances where the elector's intent can clearly and unquestionably be ascertained, the elector's vote should be counted even where the elector has not spelled the candidate's name exactly as recorded by the candidate. 1968 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 68-411.
- Titles such as "Dr.", "Rev.", "Judge", "Mr.", "Ms.", "Mrs.", or "Miss" are not a part of a person's name and should not be placed on the ballot as a part of the candidate's name. 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 84-51.
Where elected commissioner of labor withdrew prior to taking oath of office and another person was appointed to serve until the next general election in 1992, the proper ballot caption for the office for the 1992 primary and general elections was: "For Commissioner of Labor (To Succeed Al Scott for the Unexpired Term of Joe Tanner, withdrawn)". 1991 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 91-16.
- Former Code 1933, §§ 34-1102 and 34-1103 (see O.C.G.A. §§ 21-2-284 and21-2-285) allow both special election candidates and general election candidates to be listed on the same ballot so long as the candidates have qualified in accordance with the requirements of the Election Code and the elections are held on the same day; provided, however, that all persons in that election district (now precinct) who will receive the ballot are eligible to vote in both the general and the special election. 1970 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 70-115.
- Public funds may not be expended for the purpose of conducting a straw poll or public opinion referendum absent statutory authority. 1990 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U90.
- 26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, § 283 et seq.
- 29 C.J.S., Elections, §§ 266, 269, 270.
Total Results: 3
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-09-25
Snippet: for a slate of presidential electors. See OCGA § 21-2-285 (e). The winning slate of electors will in turn
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-11-02
Citation: 300 Ga. 79, 793 S.E.2d 89, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 712
Snippet: of candidacy a nomination petition. ...”);OCGA§ 21-2-285 (c) (“the names of all candidates who have been
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-10-06
Citation: 667 S.E.2d 594, 284 Ga. 423, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3150, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 820
Snippet: explain how to cast a vote, as required by OCGA § 21-2-285(b)(1), or the voter fraud language, as required