Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1952, p. 304, § 1; Code 1933, §§ 34-1322, 34-1322.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1964, Ex. Sess., p. 26, § 1; Ga. L. 1968, p. 871, §§ 9, 10; Code 1933, §§ 34-1323, 34-1324, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1969, p. 308, §§ 9, 24; Ga. L. 1987, p. 417, § 8; Ga. L. 1987, p. 1360, § 17; Ga. L. 1993, p. 118, § 1; Ga. L. 1994, p. 279, § 8; Ga. L. 1998, p. 295, § 1; Ga. L. 2003, p. 517, § 50.)
- Definition of vote and review of ballots, Ga. Official Compilation of the Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia, Georgia Election Code, Returns of Primaries and Elections, Sec. 183-1-15-.02.
- The directions as to how a voter should mark a ballot and as to what ballots shall or shall not be counted, though specifically referring to the paper ballot, are declarations of public policy by the legislature. Blackburn v. Hall, 115 Ga. App. 235, 154 S.E.2d 392 (1967).
It is the duty of the voter to make the voter's intention clear and certain, upon pain of having the vote cast out if that does not appear. Blackburn v. Hall, 115 Ga. App. 235, 154 S.E.2d 392 (1967).
Unless the ballot clearly demonstrates the voter's intention, those who are charged with the counting and tabulation of ballots should not be called upon to surmise as to what the intent may have been - for they may well come to the wrong conclusion. Blackburn v. Hall, 115 Ga. App. 235, 154 S.E.2d 392 (1967).
- An "over-vote" occurs when the voter appropriately marks the indicated space at the head of a party column on a ballot, indicating an intention to vote for all of that party's candidates, and also places marks opposite the names of an opposing candidate or candidates, indicating an intent to vote also for them, or when the voter marks a straight party ticket and additionally writes in the name of a candidate for one of the offices for which there is a candidate by that party. Where an over-vote has occurred, as to that office, or those offices, the ballot is invalid, but it is valid as to others. Blackburn v. Hall, 115 Ga. App. 235, 154 S.E.2d 392 (1967).
- Cardboard ballots "marked" by a punch are governed by the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 21-2-438 pertaining to paper ballots and, thus, votes cast on vote recorder ballots for candidates who had withdrawn from the election were void. Jones v. Norris, 262 Ga. 468, 421 S.E.2d 706 (1992).
Cited in Broome v. Martin, 111 Ga. App. 51, 140 S.E.2d 500 (1965); Henderson v. County Bd. of Registration & Elections, 126 Ga. App. 280, 190 S.E.2d 633 (1972); Rary v. Guess, 129 Ga. App. 102, 198 S.E.2d 879 (1973).
- To give meaning to former Code 1933, §§ 34-1103, 34-1330, 34-1324 (see O.C.G.A. §§ 21-2-285,21-2-452 and21-2-438) those statutes should be construed as requiring poll officers to count as valid ballots any ballot on which an elector has indicated clearly and without question the candidate for whom the elector desires to cast a vote, notwithstanding the fact the elector has not marked the ballot in accordance with the Election Code, except write-in ballots containing the name of the candidate inserted by means of a sticker, paster, stamp, or other printed or written matter. 1976 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U76-45.
- An elector, when casting a write-in vote, may use abbreviations in the title of the office if the write-in office has been abbreviated in such a way that the elector has indicated clearly and without question the office for which the elector voted. 1968 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 68-434.
- 26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, § 315 et seq.
- 29 C.J.S., Elections, §§ 289, 293, 298 et seq., 307 et seq.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1992-10-21
Citation: 262 Ga. 468, 421 S.E.2d 706, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 2452, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 914
Snippet: candidates, as was done here. However, OCGA § 21-2-438 (a), governing the conduct of elections using