O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 21-5-43 (2019)

Accounting for and expenditure of campaign contributions

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)(1) A candidate or campaign committee may separately account for contributions for each election in an election cycle for which contributions are accepted. If no contributions are accepted for an election, no corresponding accounting shall be required. Subject to the contribution limits of this chapter, contributions so separately accounted for may be accepted at any time in the election cycle. Upon the conclusion of each election, contributions not exceeding such limits may continue to be accepted for repayment of campaign obligations incurred as a candidate in that election. (2) A candidate who wishes to accept contributions for more than one election at a time shall separately account for such campaign contributions and shall file an “Option to Choose Separate Accounting” form with the commission prior to accepting contributions for any election other than the candidate’s next upcoming election; provided, however, that a candidate shall only be required to file one such form which shall be utilized for all subsequent elections to the same elective office, regardless of whether an election occurs in a new election cycle. (3) A candidate who accepts contributions for more than one election at a time may allocate contributions received from a single contributor to any election in the election cycle, provided that the contributions shall not violate maximum allowable contribution limits for any election; provided, however, that in order to allocate contributions to a past election, the candidate shall have outstanding campaign debt from the previous election. (b) Contributions separately accounted for shall not be expended on a prior election except in conformance with this Code section. Contributions separately accounted for in a primary election may be expended at any time during the election cycle prior to and including the date of the primary.

GOVT. TRANSPARENCY & CAMPAIGN FIN.

(c) Contributions remaining unexpended after the date of an election in which the candidate does appear on the ballot may be expended for any future election in the same election cycle without regard to the limitations of Code Section 21-5-41. If there are no further elections in the election cycle or if the candidate or the candidate of the campaign committee is not on the ballot of a further election in the election cycle, any remaining contributions may be used only as provided in Code Section 21-5-33. (d) Contributions accepted and separately accounted for in an election in which the candidate does not appear on the ballot, if unexpended, shall be returned to the contributors thereof pro rata without interest. Any portion thereof which cannot be returned to the original contributor thereof shall be expended only as provided in Code Section (e) For purposes of separate accounting, a candidate shall be deemed to have advanced to the next election in the election cycle upon the official certification of the election result by the Secretary of State, or upon the concession of the candidate’s election opponents, or upon receiving a preliminary consolidated election return of 50 percent plus one for advancement to a general election, or upon receiving a preliminary consolidated election return of 50 percent or less for a runoff election and placing in one of the two spots that will advance to the runoff election, whichever event shall first occur. In the event that the official certification of the election result by the Secretary of State differs from or is in conflict with a preliminary consolidated election return for advancement to a general or runoff election, the official certification of the election result by the Secretary of State shall control for purposes of this Code section. (f) The commission shall adopt such rules and regulations as are necessary to carry out the purposes of this Code section in accordance with Chapter 13 of Title 50, the “Georgia Administrative Procedure Act.”

History

Code 1981, § 21-5-43, enacted by Ga. L. 1990, p. 922, § 6; Ga. L. 1992, p. 1075, § 10; Ga. L. 1994, p. 258, § 11; Ga. L. 2000, p. 1491, § 4; Ga. L. 2005, p. 859, § 17/HB 48; Ga. L. 2022, p. 3, § 11/SB 120. The 2022 amendment, effective March 2, 2022, in subsection (c), substituted “the date of an election in which the candidate does appear on the ballot may” for “the date of the election may” in the first sentence, and substituted “any remaining contributions” for “such contribu-

tions” in the second sentence; in subsection (d), substituted “election in which the candidate does not appear on the ballot” for “election which does not occur or for which the candidate does not qualify” in the first sentence; added present subsection (e) and redesignated former subsection (e) as present subsection (f).

Annotations

Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 2000, p. 1491, § 5, not codified by the General Assembly, provides for severability. Ga. L. 2000, p. 1491, § 6, not codified by

the General Assembly, provides that for purposes of issuing rules and regulations, that Act became effective May 1, 2000. Ga. L. 2005, p. 859, § 28/HB 48, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the Act shall not apply to any violation occurring prior to January 9, 2006.

Law reviews. For note on the 1992 amendment of this Code section, see 9 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 247 (1992). For article on the 2005 amendment of this Code section, see 22 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 119 (2005).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Applicability to labor organizations. - O.C.G.A. § 21-5-43 limits local labor unions which are “established, financed, maintained, or controlled” by the same labor organization to making contributions for any one candidate not to exceed the total aggregate maximum contribution provided for in that Code section; whether any such local unions are deemed to be so affiliated with one labor organization is a question to be determined on a case by case basis. 1994 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 94-16.

Monetary contributions. - A candidate for public office may receive monetary campaign contributions for an election, and throughout each of the applicable elections for that particular public office’s cycle, whichever elections actually occur and for which the candidate is actually on the ballot. An individual may only contribute up to the maximum contribution limit to that candidate for that particular election. 2020 Op. Att’y Gen. 20-3.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1996–2017 · leading case: Oxendine v. Gov't Transparency & Campaign Fin. Comm'n, 802 S.E.2d 310 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).
Oxendine v. Gov't Transparency & Campaign Fin. Comm'n, 802 S.E.2d 310 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 6× “5 Approximately one month after the publication of the AJC article, the Commission filed an amended complaint against Oxendine asserting violations of the Act pursuant to OCGA § 21-5-41 (a), OCGA § 21-5-43 (c) and (d), and OCGA § 3 Under OCGA § 21-5-6 (b) (10) (A) (2012) the…”
Teper v. Miller, 82 F.3d 989 (11th Cir. 1996). “In fact, Teper himself wrote to the FEC in November 1995 requesting an advisory opinion on the constitutionality of O.C.G.A. § 21-5-43. In a reply letter dated December 5, 1995, the Associate General Counsel of the FEC wrote that a formal advisory opinion was unnecessary because…”
Teper v. Miller (11th Cir. 1996). “In fact, Teper himself wrote to the FEC in November 1995 requesting an advisory opinion on the constitutionality of O.C.G.A. § 21-5-43. In a reply letter dated December 5, 1995, the Associate General Counsel of the FEC wrote that a formal advisory opinion was unnecessary because…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.