Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 24-4-405 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 24 EVIDENCE

Section 4. Relevant Evidence and its Limits, 24-4-401 through 24-4-418.

ARTICLE 2 LEGISLATIVE FACTS; ORDINANCES OR RESOLUTIONS

24-4-405. Methods of proving character.

  1. In all proceedings in which evidence of character or a trait of character of a person is admissible, proof shall be made by testimony as to reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion.
  2. In proceedings in which character or a trait of character of a person is an essential element of a charge, claim, or defense or when an accused testifies to his or her own character, proof may also be made of specific instances of that person's conduct. The character of the accused, including specific instances of the accused's conduct, shall also be admissible in a presentencing hearing subject to the provisions of Code Section 17-10-2.
  3. On cross-examination, inquiry shall be allowable into relevant specific instances of conduct.

(Code 1981, §24-4-405, enacted by Ga. L. 2011, p. 99, § 2/HB 24.)

Cross references.

- Methods of proving character, Fed. R. Evid. 405.

Editor's notes.

- In light of the reenactment of this Title, effective January 1, 2013, the reader is advised to consult the annotations following Code Section 24-4-404, for cases discussing character and specific instances of previous conduct; Code Section 24-4-412, for cases discussing the complainant's character in sexual assault cases; Code Section 24-4-413, for cases discussing sexual assault; Code Section 24-4-414, for cases discussing child molestation; and Code Section 24-4-417, for cases discussing driving under the influence.

Law reviews.

- For annual survey on evidence, see 65 Mercer L. Rev. 125 (2013).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Good character conduct evidence in child molestation trial.

- In a child molestation case, the appellate court could not reach the merits of the defendant's claim regarding the exclusion of specific instances of conduct testimony from character witnesses for the defense because the affidavits from three of the character witnesses who testified at trial failed to identify any specific instance of the defendant's conduct that the witnesses were unable to testify to; furthermore, the defendant was able to present a variety of evidence regarding the defendant's good character, including specific instances of conduct. Goggins v. State, 330 Ga. App. 350, 767 S.E.2d 753 (2014).

Testimony regarding defendant's character trait of moral behavior and trustworthiness.

- In a child molestation case, the trial court did not restrict the defendant's character witnesses' ability to testify as to the defendant's character trait of moral behavior and trustworthiness with children as three witnesses testified as to that character trait, and any additional testimony regarding the defendant's morality and trustworthiness with children would have been cumulative. Goggins v. State, 330 Ga. App. 350, 767 S.E.2d 753 (2014).

Jury charge regarding character evidence.

- Trial court did not commit plain error in the court's charge to the jury on good character evidence because the defendant used the idea that the defendant did not have a reputation for violence as a means of attempting to show the defendant's good character, and the trial court merely reflected that in the court's charge to the jury; and the jury was properly left to determine whether the defendant would have acted consistently with the defendant's purported character with respect to violence, which was to not act violently towards anyone, including the victim; further, giving that proper charge did not amount to the trial court commenting on the evidence. Jacobs v. State, 303 Ga. 245, 811 S.E.2d 372 (2018).

Admission of defendant's violence-prone Facebook posts error.

- Trial court erred in allowing the state to introduce evidence in its case in chief of threatening posts the defendant had made on Facebook as evidence of the defendant's allegedly violent character and behavior in conformity therewith because O.C.G.A. § 24-4-405 required such proof be made by testimony as to reputation or in the form of an opinion; however, the error was harmless. Timmons v. State, 302 Ga. 464, 807 S.E.2d 363 (2017).

Long-standing requirement for admission of victim's character evidence not changed.

- There is no reason to construe the rules regarding the admission of character evidence as a modification of Georgia's long-standing requirement that a defendant must first make a prima facie showing of self-defense before requiring a trial court to determine whether evidence pertaining to the victim's character is admissible. Oliver v. State, 329 Ga. App. 377, 765 S.E.2d 606 (2014).

Failure to obtain victim's criminal history not prejudicial.

- Even if the first defendant's counsel performed deficiently by failing to obtain the victim's criminal history, which the first defendant alleged would have shown the existence of a prior incident of domestic violence in Alabama and the victim's propensity for violence, the first defendant failed to show prejudice because it was not clear that any such specific incident of violence would have been admissible at the first defendant's trial as the first defendant's case was tried after the enactment of Georgia's new Evidence Code; and because, at the motion for new trial hearing, the first defendant did not present any witnesses to authenticate the Alabama domestic violence police report. Ballard v. State, 297 Ga. 248, 773 S.E.2d 254 (2015).

Failure to make prima facie case of self defense meant victim's propensity for violence irrelevant.

- Because the defendant failed to make a prima facie showing that the defendant acted in self-defense and evidence of the victim's propensity for violence could not be introduced, the defendant could not satisfy the requirement of demonstrating a pertinent trait of character of the alleged victim of the crime, and there was no need to address the defendant's contention that the court incorrectly applied the rule regarding the methods of proving character. Oliver v. State, 329 Ga. App. 377, 765 S.E.2d 606 (2014).

Evidence of victim's prior convictions.

- Even if any of the victim's alleged prior crimes involved specific acts of violence, because the defendant never introduced into evidence at the motion for new trial hearing any of the victim's alleged prior convictions, the defendant could not support the defendant's claim that the defendant's counsel could have been ineffective for failing to attempt to introduce such evidence at trial. Revere v. State, 302 Ga. 44, 805 S.E.2d 69 (2017).

Limiting evidence as cumulative.

- Trial court did not err in limiting the scope of evidence regarding the defendant's good character as the additional testimony the defendant sought to have introduced would have been cumulative. Goggins v. State, 330 Ga. App. 350, 767 S.E.2d 753 (2014).

Evidence of victim's good character.

- Trial counsel performed deficiently as counsel should have objected to the inadmissible statements of three witness that improperly placed the victim's good character in issue, but counsel's deficient performance was not prejudicial because, considering the totality of the evidence, there was no reasonable probability that, had trial counsel objected to that testimony, the outcome in the defendant's case would have been different. Revere v. State, 302 Ga. 44, 805 S.E.2d 69 (2017).

Cited in Gibson v. State, 300 Ga. 494, 796 S.E.2d 712 (2017).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

- Admissibility of expert or opinion evidence of battered-woman syndrome on issue of self-defense, 58 A.L.R.5th 749.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 24-4-405

Total Results: 20  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Nundra v. State, 885 S.E.2d 790 (Ga. 2023).

Cited 28 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 21, 2023 | 316 Ga. 1

Copy

McIver v. State, 875 S.E.2d 810 (Ga. 2022).

Cited 27 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 30, 2022 | 314 Ga. 109

...character trait “is an essential element of a charge, claim, or defense or when an accused testifies to his or her own character.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Griffin v. State, 309 Ga. 860, 873 (5) (b) (849 SE2d 191) (2020) (citing OCGA § 24-4-405)....
Copy

Griffin v. State, 849 S.E.2d 191 (Ga. 2020).

Cited 21 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Sep 28, 2020 | 309 Ga. 860

...in the first instance to the sound discretion of the trial court, and we review a limitation of cross-examination only for an abuse of that discretion.” (Citation omitted.) Lucas v. State, 303 Ga. 134, 137 (2) (810 SE2d 491) (2018). OCGA § 24-4-405 (c) (“Rule 405 (c)”) provides that, “[o]n cross- examination [regarding character evidence], inquiry shall be allowable into relevant specific instances of conduct.”11 Assuming without deciding that Griffin’s inquiry would have been permitted under Rule 405 (c), it was not an abuse of discretion to disallow it under these circumstances. The record shows that the trial court 11 OCGA § 24-4-405 provides in full: (a) In all proceedings in which evidence of character or a trait of character of a person is admissible, proof shall be made by testimony as to reputation or by testimony in the form of an opi...
...Under Rule 404 (a) (1) and (2), evidence of a “pertinent trait of character” of the defendant or of the alleged victim is admissible when offered by the defendant or by the State in rebuttal.[13] OCGA § 24-4-404 (a) (1), (2). However, under OCGA § 24-4-405 . . ., such character traits generally may be proved only with “testimony as to reputation or testimony in the form of an opinion,” OCGA § 24-4-405 (a), although Rule 405 (b) provides an exception to this rule: a character trait may be proved by specific instances of the person’s conduct when the character trait “is an essential element of a charge, claim, or defense or when an accused testifies to his or her own character,” OCGA § 24-4-405 (b). Strong v....
...at ___ (3). Third and finally, although Rule 405 (c) authorized Griffin to cross-examine Richard’s opinion testimony by inquiring whether he was aware of relevant specific acts of Cheeley’s conduct, it did not require the admission of extrinsic evidence proving those acts. See OCGA § 24-4-405 (c) (“On cross-examination, inquiry shall be allowable into relevant specific instances of conduct.” (emphasis added))....
Copy

Henderson v. State, 854 S.E.2d 523 (Ga. 2021).

Cited 19 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 1, 2021 | 310 Ga. 708

...Is this where he was walking up on you? [APPELLANT]: Uh-huh. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: And what is he saying to you at this moment? 5 Under the current Evidence Code, “[t]he admissibility of evidence of a victim’s character is now governed by OCGA § 24-4-404 and § 24-4-405.” (Citation omitted.) Gibson v....
Copy

Walker v. the States, 312 Ga. 232 (Ga. 2021).

Cited 18 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Aug 10, 2021

...otograph, and to the extent they were offered as character evidence, they were unduly prejudicial and did not satisfy the applicable requirements of the 12 Georgia Evidence Code, see OCGA §§ 24-4-404 (a)2 and 24-4-405.3 Later, after an exchange in which Stodghill testified that he and his friends carried guns only for their protection and not to rob people, 2 OCGA § 24-4-404 (a) provides: (a) Evidence of a person’s character or a...
...prosecution in a homicide case to rebut evidence that the alleged victim was the first aggressor; or (3) Evidence of the character of a witness, as provided in Code Sections 24-6-607, 24-6-608, and 24-6-609. 3 OCGA § 24-4-405 provides: (a) In all proceedings in which evidence of character or a trait of character of a person is admissible, proof shall be made by testimony as to reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion....
...15 images were offered to establish. Moreover, “as a general rule, character evidence of a victim is limited to reputation or opinion.” Mohamud v. State, 297 Ga. 532, 536 (3) (773 SE2d 755) (2015). See also OCGA § 24-4-405 (a). The images Appellant sought to admit constitute neither reputation nor opinion evidence. And while evidence of specific instances of conduct may be admissible under OCGA § 24-4-405 (b) where the character trait sought to be proven “is an essential element of a charge, claim, or defense[,]” id., Appellant never argued at trial that these images were being offered for this purpose, and they would not have been admissible on this basis in any event. See Griffin v. State, 309 Ga. 860, 873 (5) (b) (849 SE2d 191) (2020) (a victim’s violent character is not an essential element of a self-defense claim). Thus, the photographs were not in a form that was admissible under OCGA § 24-4-405 (a) or (b), and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding them.4 4 We do not address — as Appellant raised below, but not on appeal — whether the images might have been admissible as impeachment evidence. 16 4....
...However, as we have already held, the photographs were not admissible as character evidence because they were neither reputation nor opinion testimony and because they did not provide proof of any element of Appellant’s self-defense claim so as to be admissible under OCGA § 24-4-405 (b)....
Copy

Beck v. State, 852 S.E.2d 535 (Ga. 2020).

Cited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Dec 7, 2020 | 310 Ga. 491

...attoos unless the tattoos were visible at the time that he was killed. Under OCGA § 24-4-404 (a) (2), a defendant is permitted to introduce evidence of a “pertinent trait of character” of the alleged victim. However, under OCGA § 24-4-405 (“Rule 405”), such character traits generally may be proved only with “testimony as to reputation or testimony in the form of an opinion[,]” OCGA § 24-4-405 (a), although Rule 405 (b) provides an exception to this rule: a character trait may be proved by specific instances of the person’s conduct when the character trait “is an essential element of a charge, claim, or defense or when an accused testifies to his or her own character,” OCGA § 24-4-405 (b). Strong v....
Copy

Thrift v. State, 852 S.E.2d 560 (Ga. 2020).

Cited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Dec 7, 2020 | 310 Ga. 499

...Rouse disappeared voluntarily because he did not want to serve jail time and because he owed a lot of money, without further impugning Rouse’s character by presenting evidence that the debt in question was for drugs. See OCGA §§ 24-4-404 and 24-4-405.10 9....
Copy

Goins v. State, 850 S.E.2d 68 (Ga. 2020).

Cited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 19, 2020 | 310 Ga. 199

...e evidence “offered nothing more than speculation and conjecture that a third person could have been involved in [the victim’s] murder”). Moreover, Appellant has not shown that the form of the proffered evidence was proper under OCGA § 24-4-405 (a).9 Because that rule generally limits “[c]haracter evidence about a victim . . . to reputation or opinion, not specific bad acts,” the convictions and 9 OCGA § 24-4-405 (a) says, “In all proceedings in which evidence of character or a trait of character of a person is admissible [other than as an essential element of a charge, claim, or defense or when an accused testifies to his own character], proof...
Copy

Wynn v. State, 874 S.E.2d 42 (Ga. 2022).

Cited 13 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 1, 2022 | 313 Ga. 827

...alleged sexual assault reflected badly on his credibility. Moreover, Wynn’s testimony that he had “never actually hurt anyone before” suggested that he lacked a propensity for violence, opening the door to the State’s limited impeachment. See OCGA § 24-4-405 (b). Given the limited and probative nature of the State’s inquiry, the impeachment evidence was not substantially more prejudicial than probative....
Copy

Anderson v. State, 901 S.E.2d 543 (Ga. 2024).

Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | May 14, 2024 | 319 Ga. 56

...Anderson contends that his trial counsel provided ineffective 14 assistance by failing to object to certain testimony from Anderson’s co-workers. In Anderson’s view, that testimony was character evidence that would have been excluded under OCGA §§ 24-4-404 (a) and 24-4-405 (a) had his counsel objected....
...See OCGA § 24-4-404 (a) (“[e]vidence of a person’s character or a trait of character shall not be admissible for the purpose of proving action in conformity therewith on a particular occasion,” subject to certain exceptions that the State did not rely on here); OCGA § 24-4-405 (a) (requiring that, whenever evidence of character is admissible, “proof shall be made by testimony as to reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion”). (a) Anderson identifies three pieces of testimony that he says counsel should have tried to exclude....
Copy

Ward v. State, 901 S.E.2d 189 (Ga. 2024).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Apr 30, 2024 | 318 Ga. 884

...40 “had been involved in either incident.” The trial court further determined that evidence of Belin’s arrests and any photographs of Belin with guns “would not have been admissible under [OCGA § 24-4-404 (a) (2) or § 24-4-405] to demonstrate that Mr....
...(b) First, although OCGA § 24-4-404 (a) (2) provides that “an accused may offer evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the alleged victim, for the purpose of proving action in conformity therewith,” that evidence “is generally limited [by OCGA § 24-4-405 (a)] to testimony as to reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion.” Copeland, 316 Ga. at 458 (3) (b) (citing OCGA §§ 24-4-404 (a) (2) and 24-4-405 (a)) (punctuation omitted)....
...d opinion testimony.” Strong v. State, 309 Ga. 295, 313-314 (3) (845 SE2d 653) (2020). We 43 have held that “‘specific instances’ of a victim’s conduct,” Copeland, 316 Ga. at 458 (3) (b) (quoting OCGA § 24-4-405 (b)), are not admissible where the accused is arguing self-defense because “a victim’s violent character is not an essential element of a self-defense claim,” Strong, 390 Ga. at 313-314 (3) (holding that OCGA § 24-4- 404 (a) “allowed [an a]ppellant to offer evidence of [the victim’s] violent character, as that trait was pertinent to [the a]ppellant’s claim of self-defense,” but OCGA § 24-4-405 (a) required that this trait be “proved only with reputation and opinion testimony”) (emphasis in original). Here, to the extent Belin’s purportedly violent character was pertinent to Ward’s claim of self-defense at trial...
Copy

Wood v. State, 890 S.E.2d 716 (Ga. 2023).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jul 5, 2023 | 316 Ga. 811

...llant was entitled to show Skinner’s character only by reputation or opinion evidence. Appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion in preventing him from cross-examining Major King about Skinner’s arrest pursuant to OCGA § 24-4-405 (c) (“Rule 405 (c)”). Rule 405 (c) provides an exception to the rule that character evidence generally must be introduced through reputation or opinion testimony, see OCGA § 24-4-405 (a), allowing a party to inquire “into relevant specific instances of conduct” on cross-examination of a character witness in order to discredit the witness....
Copy

Copeland v. State, 888 S.E.2d 517 (Ga. 2023).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | May 31, 2023 | 316 Ga. 452

...character of the alleged victim,” “for the purpose of proving action in conformity therewith,” OCGA § 24-4-404 (a) (2), but that evidence is generally limited to “testimony as to reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion,” OCGA § 24-4-405 (a)....
...when the character trait “is an essential element of a charge, claim, 5 See Ga. L. 2011, pp. 99, 214, § 101 (2013 Evidence Code made effective as to all trials “commenced on or after” January 1, 2013). 14 or defense.” OCGA § 24-4-405 (b). See Mohamud v. State, 297 Ga. 532, 536 (3) (773 SE2d 755) (2015) (construing OCGA § 24-4-405 to mean that “as a general rule, character evidence of a victim is limited to reputation or opinion, not specific bad acts”) (emphasis in original); see also United States v....
...2006) (same).6 Specific instances of a victim’s past conduct may also be admitted, not to show the victim’s action in conformity therewith, but rather “to establish the defendant’s state of mind and the 6 “OCGA §§ 24-4-404 (a) and 24-4-405 closely track their counterparts in the Federal Rules of Evidence, so we look to federal appellate decisions applying these federal rules for guidance in interpreting the Georgia statutes.” Strong v....
Copy

Tarver v. State, 902 S.E.2d 652 (Ga. 2024).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | May 29, 2024 | 319 Ga. 165

...for violence and/or specific acts of violence by [him],” and the trial court held a hearing on the motion on the first day of trial. At the hearing, the State argued that any character evidence regarding Demmons in the form of specific bad acts equated to propensity evidence under OCGA §§ 24-4-404 and 24-4-4055 and that to admit the evidence Tarver would 5 OCGA § 24-4-404 (b) provides: Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts shall not be admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, including, but not limited to, proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident. OCGA § 24-4-405 provides in relevant part: (a) In all proceedings in which evidence of character or a trait 12 be required to make a prima facie showing that he acted in self- defense by shooting Demmons, citing Oliver v....
Copy

Wright v. State, 883 S.E.2d 294 (Ga. 2023).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jan 18, 2023 | 315 Ga. 459

...t he had a reputation for peacefulness, honesty, and abiding by the law.2 2. Appellant contends, in conclusory terms, that the evidence at trial failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt either that he 2 OCGA §§ 24-4-404 (a) (1) and 24-4-405 (a) authorize a criminal defendant to offer evidence of a pertinent trait of character by presenting testimony as to the defendant’s reputation for that trait. 5 killed Brady or that he did so with the requisite criminal intent....
Copy

Gialenios v. State, 855 S.E.2d 559 (Ga. 2021).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 1, 2021 | 310 Ga. 869

...(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Harris v. State, 302 Ga. 832, 836 (3) (809 SE2d 723) (2018). (a) Since the enactment of Georgia’s current Evidence Code, “[a]dmissibility of evidence of a victim’s character is now governed by OCGA §§ 24-4-404 (a) (2) and 24-4-405 (a), which generally limit evidence of a victim’s character to reputation or opinion and not specific bad acts.” White v....
Copy

Truett v. State, 857 S.E.2d 690 (Ga. 2021).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Apr 19, 2021 | 311 Ga. 313

...trial is required because the court erroneously prevented him from asking his character witnesses “if they would be comfortable with him around their children” or about specific instances of good character. 4 The relevant section of the Evidence Code is OCGA § 24-4-405, which provides in its entirety: (a) In all proceedings in which evidence of character or a trait of character of a person is admissible, proof shall be made by testimony as to reputation or by testimony in...
...(c) On cross-examination, inquiry shall be allowable into relevant specific instances of conduct. (Emphasis supplied.)5 See generally Strong v. State, 309 Ga. 295, 313-314 (3) (845 SE2d 653) (2020) (discussing application of OCGA §§ 24-4-404 (a) and 24-4-405 (b)). The trial court held a pretrial hearing on August 17, 2015....
...The same day, the State and Truett filed numerous motions addressing evidentiary issues. Among Truett’s motions was a “Motion for Pre- Trial Ruling” in which he asked the trial court to allow character witnesses for the defense to testify under OCGA § 24-4-405 (a) to “the defendant’s reputation, demeanor and attitude toward and around children” and to their “opinion as to defendant’s character including specific, pertinent character traits exhibited by defendant within the context of the charges against him.” During the argument on this motion, the court and the parties discussed OCGA § 24-4-405 5 The italicized portions of the Georgia rule, among other provisions, do not appear in the corresponding Federal Rule of Evidence 405. . 9 (a) at some length, but subsection (b...
...testimony. At trial, after Truett had testified and his first character witness had taken the stand, the permissible scope of the character witnesses’ testimony was discussed again, and defense counsel 6 While the provisions of OCGA § 24-4-405 (b) were discussed at other points in the hearing, those discussions concerned other pretrial motions by either the State or Truett. 10 asked for “clarification” of the original ruling....
...Truett asked to question the witnesses regarding Truett’s “reputation for peacefulness,” and the trial court stated it would allow that line of questioning. Once more, however, Truett did not raise the specific provisions of OCGA § 24-4-405 (b), and there was no discussion of that subsection with respect to his character witnesses’ testimony. In Truett’s motion for new trial, he argued that the trial court erred in refusing to permit him to ask if the witnesses ...
Copy

Wood v. State, 910 S.E.2d 150 (Ga. 2024).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Dec 10, 2024 | 320 Ga. 466

...792, 794-795 (3) (809 SE2d 762) (2018); Dixon v. State, 302 Ga. 691, 697-698 (4) (808 SE2d 696) (2017). Wood On appeal, Wood contends that the trial court erred by not al- lowing her to introduce witness testimony about Kramer’s acts of violence toward other women under OCGA § 24-4-405 (b) (Rule 405), and that not admitting this evidence violated her constitutional right to a complete defense....
...women to show “her reasonableness of fear or justification for self- defense.” And it ruled that she could introduce testimony from other witnesses about Kramer’s character for violence in the form of rep- utation and opinion testimony. See OCGA § 24-4-405 (a) (“In all pro- ceedings in which evidence of character or a trait of character of a person is admissible, proof shall be made by testimony as to reputa- tion or by testimony in the form of an opinion.”). At trial, the cou...
...ing, and we express no opinion on the admissibility of this evidence, which has not been challenged on appeal. 6 that the witnesses could not testify about Kramer’s specific bad acts toward other women. See OCGA § 24-4-405 (a)-(b). Wood testified that Kramer “told [her] about the things he had done to women and he would laugh about it.” He spoke to her about his relationships with three women — A....
...“ac- tion in conformity therewith” in limited circumstances. OCGA § 24- 4-404 (a) (2). When such evidence is admissible, it generally may be introduced only “by testimony as to reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion.” OCGA § 24-4-405 (a)....
...oral argu- ment before this Court that the statements would not have been properly ad- mitted under that Rule). Thus, the trial court’s “improper bolstering” ruling is not properly before us on appeal. 9 24-4-405 (b). The testimony from S....
...Thus, evidence of a victim’s character for violence generally may be admitted only in the form of reputation or opinion testimony under Rule 405 (a), and not by proof of “specific instances” of the victim’s conduct under Rule 405 (b). See OCGA §§ 24-4-404 (a); 24-4-405 (a)-(b)....

Biggs v. State (Ga. 2026).

Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 3, 2026 | 320 Ga. 466

...force.4 3 The trial court acknowledged this Court’s holding that, because a victim’s violent character is not an essential element of self-defense, evidence of specific instances of the victim’s conduct may not be admitted under OCGA § 24-4-405(b) (“Rule 405(b)”)....

Crawford v. State (Ga. 2025).

Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Sep 30, 2025 | 320 Ga. 466

...Loring, on the night McFadden died, Crawford’s condition was 14 “very severe,” and “[h]e was terrified,” leading him to go into “shock” and shoot McFadden multiple times. 1. Relying on OCGA §§ 24-4-404(a)(2) and 24-4-405(a),8 Crawford first contends that the trial court erred by allowing McFadden’s mother to testify that her daughter was “nice” and “beautiful” and had a “good spirit” because this testimony was inadmissible good-character evidence....
...therewith on a particular occasion, except for ... evidence of a character trait of peacefulness of the alleged victim offered by the prosecution in a homicide case to rebut evidence that the alleged victim was the first aggressor. Id. OCGA § 24-4-405(a) provides that, “[i]n all proceedings in which evidence of character or a trait of character of a person is admissible, proof shall be made by testimony as to reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion.” Id. 15 great bodily injury to himself ......