Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 24-4-410 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 24 EVIDENCE

Section 4. Relevant Evidence and its Limits, 24-4-401 through 24-4-418.

ARTICLE 2 LEGISLATIVE FACTS; ORDINANCES OR RESOLUTIONS

24-4-410. Inadmissibility of pleas, plea discussions, and related statements.

Except as otherwise provided by law, evidence of the following shall not, in any judicial or administrative proceeding, be admissible against the criminal defendant who made the plea or was a participant in the plea discussions:

  1. A plea of guilty which was later withdrawn;
  2. A plea of nolo contendere;
  3. Any statement made in the course of any proceedings in which a guilty plea or a plea of nolo contendere was entered and was later withdrawn, vacated, or set aside; or
  4. Any statement made in the course of plea discussions with an attorney for the prosecuting authority which does not result in a plea of guilty or which results in a plea of guilty later withdrawn, vacated, or set aside;

    provided, however, that the statements described in paragraphs (1) through (4) of this Code section shall be admissible in any proceeding wherein another statement made in the course of the same plea or plea discussions has been introduced and the statement ought in fairness be considered contemporaneously with it or in a criminal proceeding for perjury or false statement if the statement was made by the accused under oath, on the record, and in the presence of counsel or after the accused voluntarily waived his or her right to counsel.

(Code 1981, §24-4-410, enacted by Ga. L. 2011, p. 99, § 2/HB 24.)

Cross references.

- Pleas, plea discussions, and related statements, Fed. R. Evid. 410.

Editor's notes.

- In light of the reenactment of this Title, effective January 1, 2013, the reader is advised to consult the annotations following Code Sections 17-7-93 and 17-7-95, which may also be applicable to this Code section.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 24-4-410

Total Results: 4  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Esprit v. State, 826 S.E.2d 7 (Ga. 2019).

Cited 33 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 11, 2019 | 305 Ga. 429

...s not barred by former OCGA § 17-7-93 (b), which said that a defendant's withdrawn guilty plea "shall not be admissible as evidence against him at his trial." See, e.g., Shoemake v. State, 213 Ga. App. 528, 529, 445 S.E.2d 558 (1994). See also OCGA § 24-4-410 (new Evidence Code provision governing the admissibility of pleas, plea discussions, and related statements)....
Copy

Sauder v. State, 901 S.E.2d 124 (Ga. 2024).

Cited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Apr 30, 2024 | 318 Ga. 791

...negotiations in a criminal prosecution,” but whether the rule applies “to plea bargaining in a criminal case when the evidence of such plea bargaining is offered in a civil or a criminal case” is “more debatable”). We also note that OCGA § 24-4-410 (4) generally prohibits the State from introducing against a criminal defendant evidence of “[a]ny statement made in the course of plea discussions with an attorney for the prosecuting authority which does not result in a plea of guilty...
Copy

Brennan v. State, 868 S.E.2d 782 (Ga. 2022).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 1, 2022 | 313 Ga. 345

...counsel. Appellant further 12 We note that a defendant waives certain defenses and privileges by formally entering a guilty plea, but no defenses or privileges are waived by disclosing a tentative plea agreement to a trial judge. See OCGA § 24-4-410 (3) and (4) (concerning the inadmissibility of any statements “made in the course of plea discussions” and “made in the course of any proceedings in which a guilty plea ....
Copy

Esprit v. The State (two Cases), 305 Ga. 429 (Ga. 2019).

Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 11, 2019