Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1956, p. 195, § 13.)
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, annotations decided under former Code 1910, § 2103 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Former Code 1910, § 2103 was not applicable when the contention was not that the defendant had adulterated the product by adding some deleterious foreign substance to the normal constituency of the product in order to sell it as a part of the product itself, but when the charge only contended that the defendant was negligent in allowing the normal ingredients of the product to become putrid and unwholesome. Armour & Co. v. Miller, 39 Ga. App. 228, 147 S.E. 184 (1929) (decided under former Code 1910, § 2103).
- 35A Am. Jur. 2d, Food, § 20.
- 36A C.J.S., Food, § 23.
- Preservative as adulterant within statute in relation of food, 50 A.L.R. 76.
Statutory provisions relating to purity of food products as applicable to foreign substances which get into product as result of accident or negligence, and not by purpose or design, 98 A.L.R. 1496.
Constitutionality of statutes, ordinances or other regulations against adulteration of food products as applied to substances used for preservative purposes, 114 A.L.R. 1214.
Liability of manufacturer or packer of defective article for injury to person or property of ultimate consumer who purchased from middleman, 140 A.L.R. 191; 142 A.L.R. 1490.
No results found for Georgia Code 26-2-27.