O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 26-2-33 (2019)

Enforcement of article by Commissioner; employment of personnel

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Commissioner is charged with the duty of enforcing this article and rules, regulations, and standards adopted and promulgated under this article in establishments that have the majority of square footage of building floor space used for the operation of food sales as defined in Code Section 26-2-21. The measurement of square footage shall consider indoor and outdoor dining areas as part of food service as defined in Code Section 26-2-370. The Commissioner shall employ the necessary personnel and shall fix their compensation and prescribe their duties. Duly authorized representatives are authorized to enter upon and inspect the premises of any food sales establishment.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this article, food service establishments as defined in Code Section 26-2-370 shall be inspected and regulated under Article 13 of this chapter and shall not be subject to inspection or enforcement under this article.

History

Ga. L. 1956, p. 195, § 15; Ga. L. 2000, p. 1558, § 2.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Immunity for inspectors. - Inspectors for the consumer protection division

who informed a public warehouseman that the pecans stored at its warehouse

were unfit for human consumption without destroying the condemned pecans expeditiously nor notifying the holders of a security interest in the pecans of the condemnation owed no duty to the holders of the security interest under the Georgia Food Act, O.C.G.A. § 26-2-20 et seq. The injury that the holders suffered in losing

their security was not the type of injury the Georgia Food Act was designed to prevent. Planters & Citizens Bank v. Pennsylvania Millers Mut. Ins. Co., 786 F. Supp. 991, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2540 (S.D. Ga. 1992), aff’d, No. 92-8468, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10340 (11th Cir. Apr. 29, 1993).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1992–1992 · leading case: Planters & Citizens Bank v. Pennsylvania Millers Mut. Ins., 786 F. Supp. 991 (S.D. Ga. 1992).
Planters & Citizens Bank v. Pennsylvania Millers Mut. Ins., 786 F. Supp. 991 (S.D. Ga. 1992). · cites it 2× “O.C.G.A. § 26-2-33 (1982). As agents of the Commissioner, inspectors are directed to embargo, condemn, render unsalable or destroy “any meat, seafood, poultry, vegetables, fruit, or other perishable articles which are unsound, which contain any filthy, decomposed or putrid…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.