O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 29-11-1 (2019)
Short title
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the ‘‘Uniform Adult Guardianship and Conservatorship Proceedings Jurisdiction Act.’’
History
(Code 1981, § 29-11-1, enacted by Ga. L. 2016, p. 563, § 1/HB 954.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2019–2020 · leading case: Rebecca Steen-Jorgensen v. Toni Kay Huff (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).
Rebecca Steen-Jorgensen v. Toni Kay Huff (Ga. Ct. App. 2019). “Article Two of the Georgia Uniform Adult Guardianship and Conservatorship Proceedings Jurisdiction Act, OCGA § 29-11-1 et seq., addresses the issues that may arise when it is unclear which of two or more states has jurisdiction over the imposition of a guardianship or…”
In Re Est. of Kevin Lee Hanson (Ga. Ct. App. 2020). “In a case of first impression under the Uniform Adult Guardianship and Conservatorship Proceedings Jurisdiction Act (the “UAGCPJA”), see OCGA §§ 29-11-1 et seq., we hold that the probate court plainly erred in concluding that it had such jurisdiction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.