Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1937, p. 148, §§ 6, 7; Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 103, § 14; Ga. L. 1971, p. 864, § 1; Ga. L. 1972, p. 721, § 1; Ga. L. 1977, p. 1236, § 1; Code 1933, § 58-813, enacted by Ga. L. 1977, p. 1316, § 1; Code 1933, § 5A-507, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 1573, § 1; Ga. L. 1981, p. 460, § 1; Ga. L. 1981, p. 1269, § 19; Ga. L. 1982, p. 890, § 1; Ga. L. 1984, p. 1688, § 1; Ga. L. 1985, p. 1508, § 1; Ga. L. 1986, p. 10, § 3; Ga. L. 1992, p. 1694, § 1; Ga. L. 2000, p. 1405, § 1.)
- For article, "Lawyers Who Represent Local Governments," see 23 Ga. St. B.J. 58 (1987). For annual survey of local government law, see 56 Mercer L. Rev. 351 (2004). For article, "Regulation of Alcoholic Beverages Generally," see 28 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 255 (2011). For note on 2000 amendment of this Code section, see 17 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 4 (2000).
Private clubs are covered by the prohibition against Sunday liquor sales, and a city could not by ordinance authorize sales which were expressly prohibited by state law. Cheshire Bridge Enters., Inc. v. State, 221 Ga. App. 426, 472 S.E.2d 6 (1996).
This section is not unconstitutional as a violation of the establishment clause. Neither on its face nor in its effect nor by its history does this legislation coercively aid a particular religion. Mere fact that police regulation parallels some religious commandment does not make it invalid as a religious enactment. Epstein v. Maddox, 277 F. Supp. 613 (N.D. Ga. 1967), aff'd, 401 F.2d 777 (5th Cir. 1968) (decided under Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 103).
- There was a rational basis for the statutory scheme which prohibited bars from selling alcohol on Sundays, but allowed eating establishments to sell alcohol on Sundays even if they did not serve food on Sundays; O.C.G.A. §§ 3-3-7 and3-3-20(a) did not violate equal protection and were upheld. State v. Heretic, Inc., 277 Ga. 275, 588 S.E.2d 224 (2003).
- Prohibition against sale of liquor on Sunday contained in predecessor to this section applied to sale of liquor by the drink for consumption on the premises. Hawes v. Dinkler, 224 Ga. 785, 164 S.E.2d 799 (1968) (decided under Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 103).
- Where petitioner sought to show existence of a public nuisance and amended petition by adding that the place was also one where beer was being sold on Sunday in violation of this section, effect of amendment was to amplify or give an additional reason why the place had become such a nuisance, and sale of beer on Sunday in violation of this section merely added to general character of the place as a public nuisance and did not undertake to add new cause of action. Davis v. State ex rel. Lanham, 199 Ga. 839, 35 S.E.2d 458 (1945) (decided under Ga. L. 1937, p. 148).
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, annotations rendered under Ga. L. 1964, Ex. Sess. p. 26, § 1, making it a misdemeanor to sell alcoholic beverages on primary or election days, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
The term "territorial boundaries for which the election is held" as used in subparagraph (b)(2)(A) of O.C.G.A. § 3-3-20 means the territorial boundaries of the entire political subdivision which is conducting the election. 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U84-51.
- A municipality may, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 3-3-20, permit sales of alcoholic beverages on election days for county-wide elections notwithstanding a county ordinance which expressly prohibits sales of alcoholic beverages on election days. 1985 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U85-47.
- A restaurant which holds a license to sell beer and wine and does sell beer and wine during the weekdays would not be required to close on Sunday. 1957 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 175. (rendered under former Georgia Laws).
Malt beverage regulations may not be modified so as to permit the sale of malt beverages after the hours of the election or changed to limit the prohibition to state-wide elections, such as a general election or a state-wide primary. 1965-66 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 66-13. (Decided under Ga. L. 1964, Ex. Sess. p. 26, § 1).
- The term "election day," as formerly used in the Constitution, encompasses a period of time from midnight preceding the opening of the polls until midnight succeeding the closing of the polls. 1965-66 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 66-13. (Decided under Ga. L. 1964, Ex. Sess. p. 26, § 1).
Section applies to school or hospital bond elections. 1965-66 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 65-17. (Decided under Ga. L. 1964, Ex. Sess. p. 26, § 1).
- 45 Am. Jur. 2d, Intoxicating Liquors, §§ 220, 247, 260 et seq., 413. 73 Am. Jur. 2d, Sundays and Holidays, §§ 6, 27, 43.
- 48 C.J.S., Intoxicating Liquors, §§ 32, 44, 167, 233, 256, 312.
- Power of municipal corporation to legislate as to Sunday observance, 37 A.L.R. 575.
Power to extend Sunday observance laws beyond Sunday hours, 50 A.L.R. 628.
Contributory negligence allegedly contributing to cause of injury as defense in Civil Damage Act proceeding, 64 A.L.R.3d 849.
Proof of causation of intoxication as a prerequisite to recovery under Civil Damage Act, 64 A.L.R.3d 882.
Civil Damage Act: liability of one who furnishes liquor to another for consumption by third parties, for injury caused by consumer, 64 A.L.R.3d 922.
What constitutes "sale" of liquor in violation of statute or ordinance, 89 A.L.R.3d 551.
What constitutes such discriminatory prosecution or enforcement of laws as to provide valid defense in state criminal proceedings, 95 A.L.R.3d 280.
Validity, construction, and effect of "Sunday closing" or "blue" laws - modern status, 10 A.L.R.4th 246.
Validity, under federal and state establishment of religion provisions, of prohibition of sale of intoxicating liquors on specific religious holidays, 27 A.L.R.4th 1155.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2003-10-06
Citation: 588 S.E.2d 224, 277 Ga. 275, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 2973, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 846
Snippet: challenged statutory scheme is as follows: OCGA § 3-3-20(a) provides a general ban on Sunday alcohol sales