Syfert Injury Law Firm
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448There shall be no exception from the license fees or taxes provided by this title in favor of any person unless specifically provided for by law.
(Code 1933, § 5A-504, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 1573, § 1.)
Under the statutes, a person, firm, or corporation in this state cannot lawfully engage in liquor business by proxy or under the name of another, but any and all persons, firms, or corporations who desire to engage therein must first obtain a license so to do in their own name. Smith v. Nix, 206 Ga. 403, 57 S.E.2d 275 (1950) (decided under former Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 103).
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, annotations decided under former Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 103 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
Any differences in retail liquor license rates imposed by municipality must be based on reasonable classification. 1954-56 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 493. (rendered under former Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 103).
County commissioners may not issue license free of charge to retailers to sell intoxicating liquor but may issue free license for sale of beer and wine. 1954-56 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 458. (rendered under former Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 103).
Tax may be assessed and collected on untaxed liquor which state can prove person has previously sold. 1945-47 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 377. (rendered under former Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 103).
Person in possession of untaxed liquor in wet county is not relieved of state tax thereon by its seizure as contraband and by criminal prosecution. 1945-47 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 377. (rendered under former Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 103).
- 45 Am. Jur. 2d, Intoxicating Liquors, § 144. 68 Am. Jur. 2d, Sales and Use Taxes, § 100. 71 Am. Jur. 2d, State and Local Taxation, §§ 335, 347, 360.
Total Results: 20
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-03-05
Snippet: maximum penalty for a violation of Rules 1.2, 1.3, 3.4 (a), 8.1 (a), and 8.4 (a) (4) is disbarment, while
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-02-21
Snippet: insanity pursuant to OCGA § 16-3-3”). 4 stipulation to the jury and
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-08-09
Snippet: facts, the Bar charged Eddings with violating Rules 3.3, 4.1, 4.2 (a), 8.l (a), and 8.4 (a) (4) and invoked
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-08-05
Citation: 831 S.E.2d 734
Snippet: 1.4, 1.5, 1.15 (I), 1.15 (II), 1.16 (d), 3.1, 3.3, 4.1, 5.5, and 8.4 (a) (4) of the Georgia Rules of
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2018-10-22
Citation: 820 S.E.2d 704, 304 Ga. 574
Snippet: refinancing thereof or any part thereof." OCGA § 7-3-3 (4). The financing agreements at issue in this case
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2018-03-05
Citation: 811 S.E.2d 349
Snippet: Rule 4-102 (d) : 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.7, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 4.1, 4.4, 8.1, and 8.4 (a) (4). The maximum sanction
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-12-11
Citation: 302 Ga. 742, 808 S.E.2d 650
Snippet: suspension with conditions for violations of Rules 3.3, 4.1, and 8.4 (a) (4) where attorney failed to serve
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-10-17
Citation: 300 Ga. 407, 792 S.E.2d 324, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 658
Snippet: findings and conclusions that Moore violated Rules 3.3, 4.1, and 8.4 (a) (4), and recommended a six-month
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-10-05
Citation: 297 Ga. 794, 778 S.E.2d 218, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 688
Snippet: had committed violations of Rules 1.2, 1.4, 3.1, 3.3, 4.4, and 8.4 (a) (4) of the Georgia Rules of Professional
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-10-05
Snippet: had committed violations of Rules 1.2, 1.4, 3.1, 3.3, 4.4, and 8.4 (a) (4) of the Georgia Rules of Professional
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16
Snippet: paragraphs (2.1), (2.2), (3), (3.1), (3.2), (3.3), (3.4), (3.5), (3.7), (4), (4.1), (4.2), (4.3), (4.4)
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16
Citation: 297 Ga. 1, 770 S.E.2d 616, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 179
Snippet: paragraphs (2.1), (2.2), (3), (3.1), (3.2), (3.3), (3.4), (3.5), (3.7), (4), (4.1), (4.2), (4.3), (4.4)
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-03-28
Citation: 292 Ga. 741, 741 S.E.2d 147, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1338, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 316
Snippet: punctuation omitted). See OCGA § 48-13-51 (a) (3), (3.4), (3.7) and (4.4). See OCGA § 48-8-111 (a)
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-10-29
Citation: 291 Ga. 830, 733 S.E.2d 775, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 3328, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 849
Snippet: violated Tennessee Rules of Professional Conduct 3.3, 4.1, 5.5, and 8.4 by undertaking to represent a client
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-05-29
Citation: 291 Ga. 165, 728 S.E.2d 230, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 1763, 2012 WL 1909637, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 504
Snippet: App. 92, 94 (507 SE2d 781) (1998); OCGA § 15-1-3 (3), (4). Here, the court informed the parties at the
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-06-28
Citation: 697 S.E.2d 177, 287 Ga. 391, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2086, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 485
Snippet: appearing in the record." Morrow v. State, 266 Ga. 3, 3-4, 463 S.E.2d 472 (1995).[5] The defendant will therefore
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-10-06
Citation: 668 S.E.2d 254, 284 Ga. 442, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3152, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 800
Snippet: State Bar alleges that Harrison violated Rules 3.3, 3.4, 8.1, and 8.4(a)(4) of the Georgia Rules of Professional
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-11-21
Citation: 653 S.E.2d 477, 282 Ga. 693, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 3627, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 852
Snippet: 16-3-2,[3] and delusional compulsion, OCGA § 16-3-3.[4] Counsel testified that, based upon his dealings
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2006-03-13
Citation: 627 S.E.2d 574, 280 Ga. 314, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 719, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 166
Snippet: management plan.” Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 110-4-3-.03 (4) (c). Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 110-4-3-.04 (5)
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2002-11-25
Citation: 276 Ga. 12, 573 S.E.2d 49, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 3562, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 1037
Snippet: the District Attorney. Capote v. Ray, supra at 3 (3), 4 (4). Decided November 25, 2002 Reconsideration