O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 3-3-5 (2019)

Sale of alcoholic beverages not complying with federal requirements as to quality or purity or standards adopted by commissioner

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No alcoholic beverages shall be sold by any licensee under this title if the alcoholic beverages do not fully meet all federal requirements as to quality or purity, as represented by the label, or do not meet such standards as may be adopted by the commissioner.

History

Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 103, § 26; Code 1933, § 5A-505, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 1573, § 1.

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 45 Am. Jur. 2d, Intoxicating Liquors, §§ 26 et seq., 192 et seq. C.J.S. - 48 C.J.S., Intoxicating Liquors, § 449. ALR. - Federal constitutional or legis-

lative provisions as to intoxicating liquors as affecting state legislation, 10 A.L.R. 1587; 11 A.L.R. 1320; 26 A.L.R. 661; 70 A.L.R. 132.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1996–1996 · leading case: Cheshire Bridge Enter., Inc. v. State, 472 S.E.2d 6 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cheshire Bridge Enter., Inc. v. State, 472 S.E.2d 6 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “Chapter 3, entitled “Regulation of Alcoholic Beverages Generally,” does just what its title indicates: in addition to restricting the sale of alcoholic beverages on Sundays, for example, it prohibits the sale of liquor which does not *427 meet federal and state standards as to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.