O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 3-3-8 (2019)

Possession and transportation of lawfully purchased alcoholic beverages upon which taxes have not been paid in this state

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)(1) An individual may possess and transport in this state the following quantities of alcoholic beverages upon which the taxes imposed by this title have not been paid:

(A) In the case of distilled spirits, not in excess of one-half gallon;

(B) In the case of malt beverages, not in excess of 576 ounces or two standard cases of 12 ounce cans or the equivalent thereof or one 7.75 gallon keg or barrel; and

(C) In the case of wine, not in excess of one-half gallon, except where the wine possessed was purchased and shipped pursuant to Code Section 3-6-32 and where the possessor has in his or her possession documentation evidencing that the wine was so purchased and shipped.

(2) Upon paying the excise taxes imposed by this title, an individual may possess and transport in this state the following quantities of alcoholic beverages purchased outside this state for personal or household use:

(A) In the case of distilled spirits, not in excess of one gallon;

(B) In the case of malt beverages, not in excess of two standard cases or the equivalent thereof; and

(C) In the case of wine, not in excess of two standard cases or the equivalent thereof.

(3) Whenever alcoholic beverages upon which the taxes imposed by this title have not been paid are being transported in a motor vehicle or other conveyance capable of transporting people, each individual in such motor vehicle or other conveyance, who is authorized to possess alcoholic beverages shall be entitled to the exemptions set forth in paragraph (1) of this subsection, and there shall be no presumption that all alcoholic beverages in the motor vehicle are possessed by the owner or operator of the motor vehicle. Where alcoholic beverages are possessed in excess of the exemptions set forth in paragraph (1) of this subsection, the possessor must have in his or her possession documentation evidencing that the excise taxes imposed by this title have been paid to the commissioner.

(b) This Code section shall apply only with respect to alcoholic beverages purchased by the possessor outside of this state in accordance with the laws of the place where purchased and brought into this state by the purchaser. The burden of proof that the beverages were purchased outside this state and in accordance with the laws of the place where purchased shall in all cases be upon the possessor of the beverages.

History

Code 1933, § 5A-517, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 1573, § 1; Ga. L. 1984, p. 790, § 1; Ga. L. 2000, p. 1401, § 1.

Annotations

Law reviews. - For note on 2000 amendment of this Code section, see 17 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 7 (2000).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL The Code allows possession of up to one-half gallon of distilled spirits purchased by the possessor outside of this state in accordance with the laws of the place where purchased and brought into this state by the purchaser. 1984 Op. Att’y Gen. No. U84-16. Possession of untaxed liquor ille-

gal. - It is illegal to possess in a wet county any quantity of distilled spirits on which no Georgia alcohol taxes and no alcohol taxes of another state have been paid, including among other things, all distilled spirits illegally manufactured in Georgia. 1984 Op. Att’y Gen. No. U84-16.

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Possessing liquor and transporting liquor as a single offense or as separate offenses, 74 A.L.R. 411.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1987–1987 · leading case: Hayes v. State, 355 S.E.2d 700 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987).
Hayes v. State, 355 S.E.2d 700 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Appellant argues that the trial court’s charge on the law of admissions was impermissibly burden shifting, and that the trial court erred in charging the provisions of OCGA § 3-2-33 (a) without informing the jury of the content of OCGA § 3-3-8. Neither alleged error was…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.