Syfert Injury Law Firm
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Malt beverages in quantities exceeding the amount specified in Code Section 3-3-8, upon which the taxes imposed by or authorized pursuant to this chapter have not been paid in this state, are declared to be contraband; and any motor vehicle, watercraft, or aircraft used in transporting such beverages in excess of the amount specified in Code Section 3-3-8 are also declared to be contraband and subject to seizure and disposition as provided by this title.
(Ga. L. 1937, p. 148, § 4; Ga. L. 1971, p. 817, § 1; Ga. L. 1976, p. 476, § 1; Ga. L. 1978, p. 1424, § 1; Code 1933, § 5A-4103, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 1573, § 1; Ga. L. 1981, p. 1269, § 40.)
Total Results: 11
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-05-15
Citation: 301 Ga. 227, 800 S.E.2d 279, 2017 WL 2061664, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 370
Snippet: maximum sanction for a violation of Rules 1.2, 1.3, 5.3, and 5.5 is disbarment. The maximum sanction for
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-09-12
Citation: 299 Ga. 611, 791 S.E.2d 69
Snippet: of a conspiracy pursuant to former OCGA § 24-3-5. 3 Because Burks raises an issue on appeal
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16
Snippet: 1), (2.2), (3), (3.1), (3.2), (3.3), (3.4), (3.5), (3.7), (4), (4.1), (4.2), (4.3), (4.4), (4.5), (4
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16
Citation: 297 Ga. 1, 770 S.E.2d 616, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 179
Snippet: (2.1), (2.2), (3), (3.1), (3.2), (3.3), (3.4), (3.5), (3.7), (4), (4.1), (4.2), (4.3), (4.4), (4.5), (4
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-03-28
Citation: 295 Ga. 44, 757 S.E.2d 646
Snippet: shall be admissible against all.” Former OCGA § 24-3-5.3 Appellant does not appear to dispute that the evidence
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-10-07
Citation: 293 Ga. 750, 749 S.E.2d 693, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 3088, 2013 WL 5508559, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 790
Snippet: know right.” Williams relies upon former OCGA § 24-3-5,3 in effect at the time of his trial, and Livingston
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-03-25
Citation: 292 Ga. 645, 740 S.E.2d 574
Snippet: inadmissible hearsay. Pursuant to former OCGA § 24-3-5,3 statements made by a co-conspirator during the pendency
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-10-03
Citation: 716 S.E.2d 219, 289 Ga. 831, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3034, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 728
Snippet: petition Ms. Wofford admits to violating Rules 1.1, 1.3, 5.3 and 9.3 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2003-11-10
Citation: 588 S.E.2d 694, 277 Ga. 295, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 3300, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 935
Snippet: adoption of individual amendments). [2] OCGA § 36-66-3(5). [3] City of Walnut Grove v. Questco, Ltd., 275 Ga
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1994-02-28
Citation: 264 Ga. 109, 441 S.E.2d 52, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 805, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 118
Snippet: ordinarily, have a retrospective operation." OCGA § 1-3-5.[3] (a) Compliance with subsection (k.1) is, by its
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1994-01-31
Citation: 439 S.E.2d 474, 263 Ga. 756, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 317, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 63
Snippet: establishing paternity within the meaning of OCGA § 19-11-3 (5).[3] 3. The foregoing analysis of the Child Support