Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 31-1-3 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 31-1-3 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 31-1-3

TITLE 31 HEALTH

Section 1. General Provisions; Access to Eye Care, 31-1-1 through 31-1-23.

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

31-1-3. Detection of hearing impairments in infants; evaluations.

  1. It shall be the public policy of this state that newborn infants in certain high-risk categories be evaluated for the detection of hearing impairments in order to prevent many of the consequences of these disorders.
  2. The department shall develop guidelines for evaluation and follow-up procedures for the detection of hearing impairments in infants determined by the department to be in those high-risk categories in which the likelihood of such impairments is greatest and shall develop rules and regulations to ensure that all such high-risk infants are evaluated within one year of their birth. No such evaluation shall be made as to any newborn infant if the parents or legal guardian of the child objects thereto on the grounds that such a test would conflict with their religious tenets or practices.

(Code 1933, §§ 88-3301a, 88-3302a, enacted by Ga. L. 1978, p. 1726, § 1.)

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 39 Am. Jur. 2d, Health, §§ 14, 15.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 31-1-3 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 5

Bowman v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-02-21

Snippet: in July. See OCGA § 15-6-3 (31.1). 3 called its first witness. On

McInerney v. McInerney

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-03-15

Snippet: dismiss or transfer pursuant to OCGA § 9-10-31.1? (3) Does Article VI, Section II, Paragraph VIII

Miller v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1991-11-15

Citation: 410 S.E.2d 101, 261 Ga. 679, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 939

Snippet: the victim violated Uniform Superior Court Rule 31.1. 3. The court did not err by admitting into evidence

Thaxton v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1990-05-02

Citation: 390 S.E.2d 841, 260 Ga. 141, 1990 WL 56986

Snippet: transaction evidence violated Uniform Superior Court Rule 31.1-3 and was reversible error. *144Although Rule 31

Jones v. J. S. H. Company

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1945-09-10

Citation: 35 S.E.2d 288, 199 Ga. 755, 1945 Ga. LEXIS 368

Snippet: Company, 48 shares in Darnell Security Company, 31 1/3 shares in J. S. H. Company. After making these