Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448As used in this chapter, the term:
(Code 1981, §31-32-2, enacted by Ga. L. 2007, p. 133, § 2/HB 24.)
- For note, "An Advance Directive: The Elective, Effective Way to Be Protective of Your Rights," 68 Mercer L. Rev. 521 (2017).
- Trial court properly denied summary judgment to the medical defendants on the immunity question under the Georgia Advance Directive for Health Care Act, O.C.G.A. § 31-32-10(a)(2), because genuine issues of material fact existed regarding whether the defendants made a good faith effort to rely on the directions and decisions of the patient's health care agent under the Advance Directive in carrying out the March 7 intubation. Doctors Hosp. of Augusta, LLC v. Alicea, 332 Ga. App. 529, 774 S.E.2d 114 (2015), aff'd, 299 Ga. 315, 788 S.E.2d 392 (Ga. 2016).
Total Results: 10
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-10-24
Snippet: misplaced, see Slip Op. at 25-26 (2) (d) (iii); id. at 31-32 (2) (d) (iv), however, the trial court’s ruling (which
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-07-05
Citation: 299 Ga. 315, 788 S.E.2d 392, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 448
Snippet: that controls. *323 (b) OCGA § 31-32-2 defines terms that are used in the Advance Directive
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-03-26
Citation: 642 S.E.2d 821, 281 Ga. 763, 7 Fulton County D. Rep. 915, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 253
Snippet: robbery plan turned deadly. Carter v. State, 272 Ga. 31, 32(2), 526 S.E.2d 855 (2000). Judgments affirmed. All
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-09-13
Citation: 520 S.E.2d 457, 271 Ga. 427, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 3430, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 665
Snippet: 751 (1961). See also Woodbury v. State, 264 Ga. 31, 32(2), 440 S.E.2d 461 (1994)." Cromartie v. State,
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-03-08
Citation: 514 S.E.2d 205, 270 Ga. 780, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 965, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 262
Snippet: 751 (1961). See also Woodbury v. State, 264 Ga. 31, 32(2), 440 S.E.2d 461 (1994). We find that no prospective
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1991-05-10
Citation: 404 S.E.2d 108, 261 Ga. 236, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 212
Snippet: of the Medical College of Georgia. O.C.G.A. § 31-32-2, cited by the defendant, contains a similar requirement
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1990-12-03
Citation: 398 S.E.2d 539, 260 Ga. 727, 1990 Ga. LEXIS 468
Snippet: proceedings consistent with this opinion. Id. at 31-32. 2. In light of our holding in the first division
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1989-11-21
Citation: 385 S.E.2d 651, 259 Ga. 579
Snippet: life-sustaining procedures, would produce death." OCGA § 31-32-2 (10). Subsection (B) imposes the requirement that
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1850-02-15
Citation: 8 Ga. 252
Snippet: originals filed in his office. Supreme Court Manual, 31, 32. [2.] The writ of error in this case has no entry
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1848-09-15
Citation: 5 Ga. 472
Snippet: 439. 5 M. & W. 551. Chitty on Contracts, 30, 31, 32. 2 Har. & Gill. 114. 2 Bay, 380. 5 Ham. 471. 1 Met