Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §31-32-6, enacted by Ga. L. 2007, p. 133, § 2/HB 24.)
- For survey article on wills, trusts, guardianships, and fiduciary administration, see 59 Mercer L. Rev. 447 (2007).
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Code Section 31-36-6, which was subsequently repealed but was succeeded by provisions in this Code section are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- When an attorney-in-fact sought to enjoin the attorney-in-fact's siblings from enforcing a revocation of their parent's durable health care power of attorney, the trial court did not err under former O.C.G.A. § 31-36-6(a) in finding that the revocation had not been voluntary; although the trial court concluded that the parent signed the revocation of the power of attorney, the trial court also found that the siblings' actions in making plans and removing the parent from the parent's home by force were wrongful and that the siblings knew or should have known that the parent, having been diagnosed with dementia since 2005, lacked the mental capacity and competency to execute the purported revocation in 2006. Luther v. Luther, 289 Ga. App. 428, 657 S.E.2d 574 (2008), cert. denied, No. S08C0912, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 520 (Ga. 2008) (decided under former Code Section31-36-6).
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-07-05
Citation: 299 Ga. 315, 788 S.E.2d 392, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 448
Snippet: the health care provider.” Id. See also OCGA § 31-32-6 (a) (3) and (4) (requiring the patient’s attending